|
|||||
Introduction
to Sociology SOC101
VU
Lesson
31
GENDER
SOCIALIZATION
Gender
socialization is the ways in which
society sets children onto
different courses in life
because they are
male
or female. Children are born
with a biological difference i.e. given
by nature, but gender
differences are
inculcated
through nurturance. It is the
socialization process that
lays the foundation of contrasting
orientations
to life that carries over
from childhood into
adulthood.
Children
gradually internalize the social norms
and expectations corresponding to their
being a male or a
female.
As children become conscious of
their self-identity, they also
become gender conscious,
which
usually
takes place when they are
around 3 years in age.
Internalization
of norms and expectations
are highly effective, for
most men and women
act, think, and feel
according
to the guidelines laid down by
their culture as appropriate for their
sex. How do people learn
that
certain
activities are "masculine" and
others "feminine", and on
that basis proper for them
or not? Origins
of
such gender differences in
behavior can be traced back
to socialization where individuals
learn how to
play
various roles in accordance to
their cultural prescriptions.
Gender
ordering generates a variety of masculinities
and
femininities.
Also
the same gender order acts
as
a
framework within which gender
differences emerge and are
reproduced or challenged.
Masculinities
refer to
various socially constructed collections
of assumptions, expectations and
ways of
behaving
that serve as standards for
forms of male behavior. Femininities
include
various socially
constructed
collections of assumptions, expectations
and ways of behaving that
serve as standards
for
female
behavior.
Masculinity
and femininity are subject
to change not only across
cultures, but also over
time.
Masculine
traits
Feminine
traits
Submissive
Dominant
Dependent
Independent
Unintelligent/incapable
Intelligent/competent
Emotional
Rational
Receptive
Assertive
Weak
Strong
Timid
Brave
Content
Ambitious
Passive
Active
Cooperative
Competitive
Sensitive
Insensitive
Sex
object
Sexually
aggressive
Role
of family:
The
first question people usually ask
about a newborn Is it a boy or
girl? In fact, gender is at
work even
before
the birth of child, since
most parents in the world hope to
have a boy than a girl.
Soon after birth,
family
members usher infants into the
"pink world" of girls or the
"blue world" of boys.
Parents even
convey
gender messages unconsciously in the
way they handle daughters
and sons, and thereby
inculcate
relevant
traits by sex.
Role
of peer groups:
Peer
groups further socialize
their members in accordance
with the normative conceptions of
gender.
Games
differ by gender. Male games
are usually competitive. Male
peer activities reinforce masculine
traits
of
aggression and control.
Competitiveness for boys and
cooperativeness for girls is the
usual motto.
Role
of schooling:
School
curricula encourage children to
embrace appropriate gender patterns.
Girls: Secretarial skills,
home-
centered
know-how. Boys: Woodworking,
auto-mechanics. Colleges continue with
the same pattern.
Humanities
for girls and hard subjects
for boys. Gender images in
textbooks.
Role
of Mass Media:
The
number of male characters is much higher
than female characters. Also
women are not featured
in
prominent
roles.
74
Introduction
to Sociology SOC101
VU
Men
generally play the brilliant detectives,
fearless explorers, and skilled
surgeons. Women by contrast,
play
the
less capable characters, and
are often important
primarily, by their sexual
attractiveness. Historically,
ads
have
presented women in home,
happily using cleaning
products, serving food,
trying out appliances,
and
modeling
clothes. Magazine and
newspapers: Pictures, activities,
gestures.
Advertising
perpetuates "beauty myth".
Cosmetics and diet industry
target women. The concept
of
"Beauty"
is a social construct.
Society
teaches women to measure
themselves in terms of physical
appearance: to be beautiful for
whom
and
to attract whom, and how?
Men want to possess the beauties as
objects.
Gender
Stratification
Gender
stratification refers to society's
unequal distribution of wealth,
power, and privilege between
men and women.
For
many years research on
stratification was `gender
blind' it was written as
though women did not
exist,
or
as though, for purposes of
analyzing division of power, wealth
and prestige women were
unimportant
and
uninteresting. Yet gender itself is
one of the profound examples of
stratification. There are no
societies
in
which men do not, in some
aspect of social life, have
more wealth, status, and
influence than women.
How
far we can understand gender
inequalities in modern times mainly in terms of
class divisions?
Inequalities
of gender are more deep
rooted historically than class
systems; men have superior
standing to
women
even in hunting and
gathering societies, where
there are no classes. Class
divisions in modern
societies
are so marked that there is
no doubt that they `overlap'
substantially with gender
inequalities. The
material
position of most women tends
to reflect that of their fathers or
husbands; hence it can be
argued
that
we have to explain gender inequalities mainly in
class terms.
Determining
women's class position
The
view that class inequalities
largely govern gender stratification
was often an unstated
assumption until
quite
recently. The `conventional position' in
class analysis was that the
paid work of women is relatively
insignificant
compared to that of men, and
that therefore women can be
regarded as being in the same
class
as
their husbands. Since
majority of women have
traditionally been in a position of
economic dependence
on
their husbands, it follows
that their class position is
most often governed by the husband's
class
situation.
This
position has been criticized in
many ways. First, in many
households the income of women is
essential
to
maintaining the family's economic position
and mode of life. In these
circumstances women's paid
employment
in some part determines the
class position of the family as a whole.
Second, a wife's
occupation
may sometimes set the
standard of the family as a whole. Even
if the woman earns less than
her
husband,
her working situation may
still be the `lead' factor in
influencing the class of her
husband.
Third,
where `cross-class' households
exist in which the work of the
husband is in a different
class
category
from that of the wife
there may be some purposes
for which it is more
realistic to treat men
and
women,
even within the same
households, as being in different class
positions. Fourth, the proportion
of
households
in which women are sole
breadwinners is increasing. The
growing number of lone mothers
and
childless
workingwomen are testament to this
fact. Such women are by
definition the determining influence
on
the class position of their
own households.
One
suggestion is that the class
position of person be determined without
reference to the position of
one's
household.
Social class of a person may
be assessed on the basis of one's
occupation. This approach
ignores
those
women who work as housewives
and many who are retired
people and unemployed.
75
Table of Contents:
|
|||||