Introduction
to Sociology SOC101
VU
Lesson
24
THEORIES
OF CLASS AND SOCIAL STRATIFICATION
III
Why
are societies stratified? One answer
consistent with structural
functional paradigm is that
social
inequality
plays a vital part in the
operation of society. This argument
was put forth by Kingsley Davis
and
Wilbert
Moor in 1945. The assertion
is that social
stratification has beneficial consequences
for the operation of a
society.
That
could be one explanation for the fact
that some form of social
stratification has been
found
everywhere.
Davis
and Moore approach (1945)
explain it like this:
·
Some
positions are functionally more
important.
·
Some
roles can only be taken by
certain individuals.
·
High
skills to be paid higher rewards.
·
They
have to be provided higher
status.
·
Stratification
ensures that the most appropriate people
are selected for high
reward jobs.
Meritocracy
·
System
is functional. To alter it is
misguided.
Criticism:
·
Why
some positions are considered as
functionally more important
than others?
·
Who
decides what is important?
·
Does
meritocracy work? Does everybody get the
same opportunities?
Inequality
is in-built in stratification.
(Private
schools. Status to be
bought)
Everybody
does not achieve status
(ascribed)
The
wealthier a person becomes the lesser
he/she needs to render any
service to society.
Davis-Moore
approach lacks empirical
basis.
Functionalist
view of social class is
little more than an ideological
justification of inequality in
society.
60