ZeePedia

“THE EUROPEAN UNION”:The social dimension, Employment Policy

<< “WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO)”
“REGIONAL PACTS”:North America’s Second Decade, Mind the gap >>
img
Globalization of Media ­MCM404
VU
Lesson 29
"THE EUROPEAN UNION"
Note:  the text of this handout is excerpted from the publication in brochure form titled: Europe in 12
lessons" by Pascal Fontaine, published by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Press and
Communication Publication, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium in October 2003.
Students are advised to visit the EU website at europa.eu.int/comm./publications to obtain further relevant
information on the EU provided in this publication as well as in a whole series of similar publication.
In 2005, as a result of negative votes by citizens of major European countries against a draft constitution for
the EU, new debates and speculations have begun on the need to conduct comprehensive reforms and to
bring the EU system closer to public opinion at the grass-roots level. To keep themselves well-informed on
this on-going debate, students are advised to observe programmes on the BBC World Service TV and
analysis printed from time to time in leading newspapers and journals.
The merit of this particular text in this handout is that it provides students with information which is rarely
reported in the daily news media and helps them appreciate the actual, practical work done at the grass-roots
level by the EU.
What does the Union do?
The people who drafted the Treaty of Rome set the following task for the European Economic Community:
`by establishing a common market and progressively approximating the economic policies of member states, to promote throughout
the Community a harmonious development of economic activities, a continuous and balanced expansion, an increase in stability,
an accelerated raising of the standard of living and closer relations between the States belonging to it.'
These goals have been largely achieved, thanks to the free movement of goods, people, services and capital
and to the EU's policy of ensuring fair competition between businesses and protecting consumer interests.
The single market was completed in 1993 and the euro came into circulation in 2002.
But, to enable all sectors of the economy and all regions of Europe to benefit from these achievements, they
had to be backed up by `structural' policies financed and pursued with commitment and determination by the
EU itself.
Europe's political leaders realised early in that European solidarity would mean taking action to strengthen
`economic and social cohesion' ­­ in other words, to narrow the gap between richer and poorer regions. In
practice, this meant introducing regional and social policies, and these policies have become more important
with each successive enlargement of the EU.
Regional action
The EU's regional policy consists essentially of making payments from the EU budget to disadvantaged
regions and sections of the population. The total amount allocated in 2000-2006 is €213 billion. The
payments are used to boost development in backward regions, to convert old industrial zones, to help young
people and the long-term un-employed find work, to modernise farming and to help less-favoured rural areas.
The money is paid through specific funds ­­ the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the
European Social Fund (ESF), the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG) and the European
Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF, also commonly known by its French acronym
FEOGA).
These payments top up or stimulate investment by the private sector and by national and regional
governments. To target the payments where they will have the greatest effect, the EU has set itself three
priority objectives:
86
img
Globalization of Media ­MCM404
VU
Objective 1 is to help develop regions where the wealth produced divided by the number of
inhabitants ­­ technically known as `gross domestic product (GDP) per capita' ­­ is less than 75% of
the EU average. This aid, amounting to €135 billion, is two-thirds of all the money allocated to
regional policy in 2000-2006. It does to benefit about 50 regions, representing 22% of the EU's
population. It is used to get the economy moving in these regions by creating the infrastructure they
lack, providing better training for local people and stimulating investment in local business.
Objective 2 is to help the regions in difficulty. They may be areas where the economy is being
restructured, declining rural areas, fishing communities in crisis or urban areas with serious problems.
Objective 3 is to combat unemployment by modernising training systems and helping to create jobs.
Specific programmes aimed at these objectives include Interreg, which promotes co-operation
across borders and between regions, and Urban ­­ which supports the sustainable development of
cities and urban areas in crisis.
In addition to these `structural' funds there is a `Cohesion Fund'.  This is used to finance transport
infrastructure and environmental projects in EU countries whose per capita GDP is less than 90% of the EU
average. The countries concerned until now have been Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain.
Thanks to structural schemes such as these, financed by the European Union, EU countries have been better
able to bring their economies into line with one another. This economic `convergence' is also the result of
action by EU governments to meet the requirements for economic and monetary union.
Extending structural policy to embrace the new member states
Enlarging the Union to take in 10 new member states will pose a major challenge for economic and social
cohesion, because development in some regions of these countries lags well behind the rest of the EU.
Enlargement will, in fact, make the Union more diverse and require further efforts at sectoral and regional
adjustment.
A number of `instruments' are already being used to help the candidate countries. First there is the Phare
programme, which channels aid to the candidate countries in central and eastern Europe. Over the period
2000 to 2006 they will receive a total of €10.9 billion in `pre-accession' aid.
Then there is ISPA (Instrument for Structural Policies or Pre-Accession), which finances environmental and
transport projects and has a budget of €7.2 billion.
Thirdly, Sapard (an instrument for financing agriculture) has a budget of €3.6 billion. After accession (i.e.
after the new member states join), the Structural Fund programmes and Cohesion Fund projects will take
over from pre-accession aid.
The social dimension
The aim of the EU's social policy is to correct the most glaring inequalities in European society. The
European Social Fund (ESF) was set up in 1961 to promote job creation and help workers move from one
type of work and one geographical area to another. For 2003, the ESF was allocated €4.8 billion from the
EU budget.
Financial aid is not the only way in which the EU seeks to improve social conditions in Europe. Aid alone
could never solve all the problems caused by economic recession or by regional under-development. Social
progress springs, first and foremost, from economic growth and is nurtured by both national and EU
policies.
Social progress is also supported by legislation that guarantees all EU citizens a solid set of basic rights. Some
of these rights are enshrined in the Treaties ­­ for example, the right of men and women to equal pay for
equal work. Others are set out in directives about the protection of workers (health and safety at work) and
essential safety standards.
87
img
Globalization of Media ­MCM404
VU
In December 1991, the Maastricht European Council adopted the Community Charter of basic social rights,
setting out the rights all workers in the EU should enjoy: free movement; fair pay; improved working
conditions; social protection; the right to form associations and to undertake collective bargaining; the right
to vocational training; equal treatment of women and men; worker information, consultation and
participation; health protection and safety at the work-place; protection for children, the elderly and the
disabled. At Amsterdam in June 1997, this Charter became an integral part of the Treaty and is applicable in
all the member states.
Employment Policy
During the final decade of the 20th century, EU citizens were increasingly calling on their governments to take
more vigorous action to create jobs. How could Europeans believe in the benefits of European integration
and have confidence in its future while more than 10% of the EU's workforce (until 1997) were unemployed?
So a new chapter on employment was inserted into the Treaty of Amsterdam, making job creation a priority
for the EU's economic policy.
At the European Council in Luxembourg on 20 and 21 November 1997, the leaders of the 15 member states
agreed a coordinated strategy for making their individual national policies more effective. It was a strategy for
better vocational training, for helping start up new businesses and for improving `social dialogue' ­­ i.e.
relations between employers and employees. It laid down guidelines for boosting employment. Progress on
implementing these guidelines is regularly reviewed by the member states and the EU institutions, using a
jointly agreed assessment procedure.
The `Luxembourg strategy' was beefed up and given a broader scope by the European Council in Lisbon in
March 2000. It became the `Lisbon strategy', and it was directed towards a new and very ambitious goal: to
make the EU, within a decade, `the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of
sustainable growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion'.
88
Table of Contents:
  1. THE UNIQUE NATURE OF THE PAKISTANI NATION-STATE
  2. “PAKISTAN: THE FIRST 11 YEARS 1947-1958” PART 1
  3. “PAKISTAN: THE FIRST 11 YEARS 1947-1958”PART-2
  4. ROOTS OF CHAOS: TINY ACTS OR GIANT MIS-STEPS?
  5. “FROM NEW HOPES TO SHATTERED DREAMS: 1958-1971”
  6. “RENEWING PAKISTAN: 1971-2005” PART-I: 1971-1988
  7. RENEWING PAKISTAN: PART II 1971-2005 (1988-2005)
  8. THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, PARTS I & II
  9. THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, PARTS I & II:Changing the Constitution
  10. THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF PAKISTAN:Senate Polls: Secrecy Breeds Distortion
  11. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN:A new role for the Election Commission
  12. “POLITICAL GROUPINGS AND ALLIANCES: ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES”
  13. THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS AND INTEREST GROUPS
  14. “THE POPULATION, EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS OF PAKISTAN”
  15. THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT POLICY 2005:Environment and Housing
  16. NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 2005:The National Policy, Sectoral Guidelines
  17. THE CHILDREN OF PAKISTAN:Law Reforms, National Plan of Action
  18. “THE HEALTH SECTOR OF PAKISTAN”
  19. NGOS AND DEVELOPMENT
  20. “THE INFORMATION SECTOR OF PAKISTAN”
  21. MEDIA AS ELEMENTS OF NATIONAL POWER:Directions of National Security
  22. ONE GLOBE: MANY WORLDS
  23. “THE UNITED NATIONS” PART-1
  24. “THE UNITED NATIONS” PART-2
  25. “MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS (MDGS)”:Excerpt
  26. “THE GLOBALIZATION: THREATS AND RESPONSES – PART-1”:The Services of Nature
  27. THE GLOBALIZATION: THREATS AND RESPONSES – PART-2”
  28. “WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO)”
  29. “THE EUROPEAN UNION”:The social dimension, Employment Policy
  30. “REGIONAL PACTS”:North America’s Second Decade, Mind the gap
  31. “OIC: ORGANIZATION OF THE ISLAMIC CONFERENCE”
  32. “FROM SOUTH ASIA TO SAARC”:Update
  33. “THE PAKISTAN-INDIA RELATIONSHIP”
  34. “DIMENSIONS OF TERRORISM”
  35. FROM VIOLENT CONFLICT TO PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE
  36. “OIL AND BEYOND”
  37. “PAKISTAN’S FOREIGN POLICY”
  38. “EMERGING TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS”
  39. “GLOBALIZATION OF MEDIA”
  40. “GLOBALIZATION AND INDIGENIZATION OF MEDIA”
  41. “BALANCING PUBLIC INTERESTS AND COMMERCIAL INTERESTS”
  42. “CITIZENS’ MEDIA AND CITIZENS’ MEDIA DIALOGUE”
  43. “CITIZENS’ MEDIA RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES”Exclusive Membership
  44. “CITIZENS’ PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC SERVICE BROADCASTING”:Forming a Group
  45. “MEDIA IN THE 21ST CENTURY”