|
|||||
Introduction
to Sociology SOC101
VU
Lesson
41
ENVIRONMENT
AND SOCIETY
What
is the relationship between environment
and society? What kinds of
impact do human groups
make
upon
the planet? How have
environmental (or ecological)
limits shaped human
behavior, cultural practices
and
social institutions? What do developments
in science and technology, economic
practice and
government
policy tell us about the changing forms
of nature-society relationships? These
are some of the
questions
that germinate discussions
about issues pertaining to
environment-society relationships.
Environment:
Stems from the French world
viron,
meaning
a circle, a round, or the country around.
Hence
environment
means the external conditions and
influences affecting the life of an
organism, or entire
societies,
or the "physical and biotic
infrastructure" supporting populations of
all kind. In this way
environment
is the total physical and
material bases of all life,
including land, air, water, and the
vital
material
resources and energy in
which societies are
embedded. It may be called natural
environment.
Natural
environment: The
earth's surface and
atmosphere, including living
organisms, air, water, soil,
and
other
resources necessary to sustain
life.
Environment
serves three distinct
functions for
societies:
·
Provides
our home, or the space in
which we conduct our activities (living
space);
·
Supplies
us with the resources that
are necessary for living
(supply
depot); and
·
Acts as a
`sink' for absorbing the
waste products of modern industrial
societies (waste
repository).
These
three functions may compete
with each other.
Because
of increase in population and the
related activities:
·
There is
substantially more conflict
between the three functions,
·
The
total human demand or `load'
may be exceeding the long-term
carrying capacity of
both
specific
areas and even of the global
ecosystem.
Ecology:
The
study of interaction of living
organisms and the natural environment.
Like any other
species,
humans
depend on the natural environment. But it
is the humans who have the culture.
With the
development
of culture human beings transform the
environment, for better or worse.
Where human
beings
have put nature to its
service, the whole process
has germinated problems of solid
waste, pollution,
global
warming, biodiversity, etc.
Who created all this?
Obviously these are the
results of human
actions.
Hence
one looks at some of the fundamental
social issues like: What
"the environment" means to
people?
How
do the meanings (thoughts, hopes, fears)
change? How human social
patterns put mounting
pressure
on
the environment?
Global
Dimension:
Planet
is a single eco-system. Echo
is
`house', which reminds us
that this planet is our home
and that all
living
things and their natural environment
are interrelated. It is a
system composed of the interaction of all
living
organisms
and their natural
environment. Such
inter-connectedness means that
changes in any part of the
natural
environment
ripple through the entire global
ecosystem. For example,
ozone is a layer in the
atmosphere
that
restricts the entry of harmful
ultraviolet radiation. As a result of
environmental changes it is in the
depletion
process.
Historical
Dimension:
How
have people gained the power to threaten the natural
environment? Human beings have the
capacity
to
develop culture. Continuously the technology is being
improved. Human beings have
moved from
hunting
societies to pastorals, to
agriculturists, to industrial society
and to post industrial society. In
this
process
of development it has been seen
that humans consume natural
resources and release
pollutants.
Can
we say that man has
been bending nature? In this process the
role of rich countries has
been crucial.
They
produce 1000 times more
goods than the poor nations.
Raise the standard of living → produce
more
solid
waste and pollution.
Where
there are material benefits of
technology
→ there
are negative effects on the
environment like:
109
Introduction
to Sociology SOC101
VU
Running
an environmental deficit: A
profound and negative
long-term harm to the natural
environment caused by
humanity's
focus on short-term material affluence.
The
concept of environmental deficit is
important for three
reasons.
First, it reminds us that the state of
environment is social issue, reflecting
the choices people make
about
how to live. Second, it
suggests that environmental
damage to their air, land, or
water is often
unintended.
By focusing on the short-term benefits of,
say cutting down forests,
using throwaway
packaging,
we fail to see their
long-term environmental effects.
Third, in some respects, the
environmental
deficit
is reversible. Inasmuch as societies
have created environmental
problems, in other words,
societies
can
undo many of them.
Population
Increase: After
technology, the rapid growth of
population is another threat to the
environment.
With the economic development the previous
balance between the high
birth rate and
high
death
rate has been disturbed by the
rapid decline in the death
rate and the birth rate
lagging behind in its
slow
decline. The resultant
demographic transition has
lead to population explosion. By the end
of 20th
century
the planet earth was carrying
more than six billion
people, out of which about
five billion were in
the
relatively poor countries. Poor people
have no choice but to
consume whatever is available in
the
environment.
How
about consumerism? So many
autos →
need
oil →
pollution.
Planet suffers from
over-development.
Cultural
Patterns: Growth and Limits
Our
cultural outlook especially how we
construct a vision of "the
good life' also has
environmental
consequences.
People look for material
comfort whereby progress and
science become the
cherished
values.
Logic of growth is the additional
consumption of environment. Nevertheless, the
finite resources
put
limits to growth. Humanity
must implement policies to control the
growth of population,
production,
and
the use of resources in order to
avoid environmental
collapse.
110
Table of Contents:
|
|||||