|
|||||
Introduction
to Cultural Anthropology
SOC401
VU
Lesson
44
ETHICS
IN ANTHROPOLOGY
Ethical
Condemnation
Since
the 1960s, cultural anthropology has
been the target of critical attacks
both from within and
without
the
discipline. The condemnation of anthropology
and anthropologists by postmodernism,
literary theory,
and
post-colonialism, among others, has
been directed at its status
as a science and its
participation in the
oppression
of minorities and justification of
colonialism.
Critics
assert that anthropology has
been used solely to
objectify oppressed peoples
and that it cannot be
considered
a science. Anthropologists are
blamed for asserting
domination over his or her
subject due to
negative
and inaccurate representations
formed by the critics.
Anthropology
is charged with ignoring
history in studying non-Western societies
and so anthropologists
have
been blamed for treating
cultures as isolated from
neighbors and the world at
large. Anthropologists
can
also reinforce biases and
stereotypes by using flawed methodology
in their works
Orientalism
By
studying the orient the scholar separates
him or herself from the culture they
study and recreate it
as
another
world. Said believes that
Asians are confined by the
Oriental label that has
been constructed by the
European
scholar.
It
is natural for the human race to
divide itself into "us"
and "them." It is this division
that leads to
hostility.
The
separation that arises due
to scholarly study only
strengthens this hostility.
Response
of Anthropologists
In
order to continue the study of culture,
anthropology developed the term relativism, which
stated that all
cultures
were equal, but not
necessarily alike.
Cultural
anthropology could not, however,
accept relativism because issues of
morality became
controversial.
The study of anthropology
became obsessed with data
analysis in order to avoid
moral
judgment.
Classic
anthropologists feared domination of the discipline by
psychology and sociology;
therefore,
anthropology,
had to be redefined in order to shift the
focus of the discipline back to the study
of culture.
Past
research existed only on exotic
cultures and the theories developed
from that research were
used to try
to
define modern, or first-world, culture.
Several problems arose from
this movement. Few people
were
interested
in studies in cities or familiar
places, the exotic areas broke the rule
that all cultures are
equal, and,
therefore,
these areas drew the
attention of anthropologists. Another
problem was that all
previous studies
were
done on societies with no recorded
history, and, therefore, no changes in
patterns or traditions
were
observed
Defending
Anthropological Integrity
Leading
and influential anthropologists generally
believed in uniformity in the actions and
nature of
humankind,
not in the idea of self and
the `Other'. They wanted to study all
forms of culture, at home and
abroad,
to discover similarities.
There
are several examples of anthropologists
who recognized the importance of
borrowing, diffusion,
and
regional
and global interactions in shaping
society. Anthropology should base
their criticisms on a
careful
scrutiny
of facts.
94
Introduction
to Cultural Anthropology
SOC401
VU
Using
Criticism Constructively
Questions
and ideas put forth by
anthropology's critics must be used to
help avoid misperceptions
and
poorly
founded opinions from
passing on as common knowledge to the new generation
of anthropologists.
Reexamination
of the prevalent attitudes in anthropology
can move away the notion of
anthropologists as
authoritarian
figures to humanistic, scientific
scholars interested in comparing
and contrasting cultures.
Assuring
Anthropological Integrity
Objectivity
and functional analysis combined
with today's knowledge of psychology
that is the key to
comprehensiveness
and objectivity in
anthropology.
Useful
Terms
Objectivity
unbiased observation of facts
Authoritarian
monopolized exertion of power
Prevalent
existing or
in current use
Scrutiny
study or careful observation
Suggested
Readings
Students
are advised to read the
following chapters to develop a better understanding
of the various
principals
highlighted in this hand-out:
Chapter
28 in `Anthropology' by
Ember
Internet
Resources
In
addition to reading from the
textbook, please visit the
following web-site for this
lecture, which
provide
useful
and interesting information:
Ethics
in Anthropology
http://www.publicanthropology.org/Journals/Engaging-Ideas/Rt(yano)/Peters1.htm
95
Table of Contents:
|
|||||