|
|||||
VU
Sport
Psychology (PSY407)
Lesson
02
SELF-CONFIDENCE
AND SPORT PSYCHOLOGY
Athletes
who are highly motivated
tend to be very self-confident about their abilities.
Yet, a distinction
must
be made between global
self-confidence and situation-specific
self-confidence.
Global
confidence is
more of a personality trait or disposition.
Global self is an important
personality
characteristic
that facilitates daily living. It
can be instrumental in encouraging a young
person to try
new
things, but it is not the same as
believing that you can
succeed at a specific task.
Situation-specific
confidence
is the
confidence one shows in
performing a particular task. For
example, a cricket player
may
have high level of self-confidence in
batting, but a low level of
self-confidence in fielding.
Models
of Self-Confidence
The
three models of self-confidence
will be discussed. These
include:
·
Bandura's
Self-Efficacy
Theory
·
Harter's
Competence
Motivation,
Sport
Confidence Theory
·
Vealey's
Sports-Specific
Model Of Sports
Confidence
Bandura's
Theory of Self-Efficacy (1997)
Bandura
(1997) defines self-efficacy as
`beliefs in one's capabilities to
organize and execute the
course
of
action required to produce given attainments". As such,
self-efficacy is a form of
situation-specified
self-confidence.
Self-efficacy
is the critical component of what Bandura refers to as
social cognitive theory. In
order for
self-efficacy
to develop, the individual must believe
that she is in control and
that the acts she
performed
were performed intentionally.
The power and will to originate a
course of action is the key
feature
of personal agency. Now for
example if a person believes
she is in control and that
she has the
power
to produce specific results,
she will be motivated to try
to make things happen.
Now
if an athlete perceives or believes
that she can influence for
good the outcome of a contest,
she
will
eagerly enter into the
competition. Thus, an efficacious
athlete is a motivated athlete.
The athlete is
motivated
to work hard to ensure success
because she believes that
she can succeed.
Bandura
proposes four fundamental elements
effective in developing self-efficacy.
Each of these
elements
is critical in understanding how an athlete
can develop self-efficacy and
self-confidence.
Bandura's
four fundamental elements in
developing self-efficacy
1.
Successful Performance
In
successful performance the athlete
must experience success in
order for self-efficacy to
develop.
With
a difficult task, this is an unrealistic
expectation, so the coach or teacher must
ensure success by
initially
reducing the difficulty the difficulty of
the task. An example of this can be
found in tennis and
volleyball
instructions. A beginner may not be able
to successfully serve volleyball
across the net on a
regulation
court, but when the coach
encourages the athlete to step
into the court several
meters, it can
be
accomplished.
4
VU
Sport
Psychology (PSY407)
2.
Vicarious Experience
Beginning
athletes can experience
success through models. In learning a
new skill the learner needs
a template
or
model to copy. This can be provided by
the instructor, a skilled teammate, or a
film or video of a skilled
performer.
An
important component of Bandura's theory
is the concept of participatory modeling. In
participatory
modeling,
the learner first observes a model
perform a task. Then the
instructor or model assists the subject
in
successfully
performing the task. The
vicarious experience of success
will provide a good
foundation for the
experience
of success in a real situation.
3.
Verbal persuasion
Verbal
persuasion usually comes in the
form of encouragement form the
coach, parents, or peers.
Helpful
verbal
statements that suggest that
the athlete is competent and can
succeed are most desirable.
Coaching
should
be such that it should not contain
any negativism.
For
example, the coach could say
"good swing, Mary. Now
remember to keep your eyes
on the ball". Verbal
persuasion
can also take the form of
self-persuasion. This is referred to as
self-talk.
4.
Emotional arousal
Emotional
and physiological arousal is the factors
that can influence readiness
for learning. Proper attention is
important
in helping the athlete to master a
particular skill and develop a feeling of
efficacy.
The
efficacy of Bandura's model in the sport
setting is well documented.
Perceived self-efficacy is a strong
and
consistent
predictor of individual athletic
performance.
Harter's
Competence Motivation Theory
(1978)
According
to Harter the theory of achievement
motivation is based on an athlete's
feeling of personal
competence.
According to Harter, individuals
are innately motivated to be competent in
all areas of human
achievement.
An individual's self-perception of success at
these mastery attempts
develops feelings of
positive
or
negative affect. Successful attempts at
mastery promote self
efficacy and feelings of
personal competence,
which
in turn foster high competence
motivation. As competence motivation
increases, the athlete is
encouraged
to make further mastery
attempts.
Conversely,
if a young athlete's attempts at mastery
result in perceived rejection and
failure, and then low
competence
motivation and negative affect
will be the end product. It is
hypothesized that low
competence
motivation
will result in a youth sport
dropout.
Sports-related
studies have provided
support for Harter's competence
motivation theory. In Harter's
model,
high
competence motivation leads to
successful task performance,
much as high self-efficacy
leads to successful
performance.
Vealey's
Sport-Specific Model of Sport
Confidence (1986)
Vealey
defines sport confidence as `the belief
or degree of certainty individuals
possess about their
ability
to be successful in sport'. The athlete
brings to the objective competitive situation a
personality
trait
of sport confidence (SC-Trait) and a particular
competitive orientation. These two
factors are then
predictive
of the level of situational state-specific sport
confidence (SC-state) the athlete
exhibits during
competition.
Situation-specific sport confidence (SC-state) is
then predictive of performance or
clear
5
VU
Sport
Psychology (PSY407)
behavioral
response. Behavioral responses give rise
to subjective perceptions of outcome.
Examples of
subjective
outcome include things such as
satisfaction, perception of success.
Subjective outcomes in
turn
influence and are influenced by the
athlete's competitive orientation
and personality trait of sport
confidence.
Vealey
(1986) tested the basic
tenets of her proposed model
and found them to be viable. In doing
so,
she
also developed instruments for
measuring SC-trait (Trait
Sport-Confidence Inventory),
SC-state
(State
Sport-Confidence Inventory), and
Competitive Orientation (Competitive
Orientation Inventory).
Vealey's
sport confidence model is very useful for
explaining the relationship between
general sport
confidence
and situation-specific sport confidence. An
athlete who is very successful at
one sport
transfers
much of the confidence derived from his
success to other sport
situations.
Developing
Self-Confidence Through
Self-Talk
Self
talk basically is an effective technique to
control thoughts and to influence
feelings. Thoughts and
feelings
can influence self-confidence as well as
performance.
Thoughts
that come into an athlete's
mind during competition can
be either positive or negative.
These
thoughts
are a form of self talk.
This athlete must learn to
control his thoughts and to
structure them to
his
advantage. This is effectively
accomplished through self
talk. The athlete must
carefully select the
actual
words and phrases used
during self talk and
consider them for maximum
effectiveness.
Zinsser,
Bunker, and Williams (2001)
explain that thoughts affect feeling, which in turn
influence
behavior
or performance in sport.
Thoughts
feelings
performance
An
athlete may not feel as self-confident in
a situation as she ought to feel. Lack of
self-confidence will
have
a negative effect upon how
well an athlete performs. When an
athlete steps to the foul
line to
attempt
the first of two free throws in
basketball, a number of self-efficacy thoughts
pass though
consciousness.
Hopefully, the thought and feeling is
one of "give me the ball; I have
made this shot a
hundred
times and I will do it
again. Unfortunately, for
many athletes the thought
that comes into
their
minds
is: "I should be able to make this
shot, but what I miss?" The
two athletes in this example
may
be
equally skilled as far as years of
experience and practice are
concerned, but level of state
self
confidence
is very different. In these two
situations, self-talk can be effective in either
affirming self-
efficacy
or countering negative thoughts with
positive thoughts.
Categories
of Self-Talk
Self
talk can be in the form of
words actually spoken, or in the
form of thoughts that come
into ones
mind.
These thoughts can be either positive or
negative. As a psychological method for
improving self-
confidence,
self-talk must be positive in nature
and lead to positive
feelings about an athlete's
ability.
Self
talk is basically used to
enhance the self confidence in athletes.
Self talk is a strategy used
by both
players'
juniors as well as
professional.
The
three primary categories of
self-talk,
1.
Task-specific
statements relating to technique
2.
Encouragements
and effort
3.
Mood
words
6
VU
Sport
Psychology (PSY407)
Task-specific
statements relating to
technique
This
category of self-talk refers to words or
statements that reinforce technique.
For example, in tennis
volley,
the
word "turn" might be used in
association with preparation for
stepping into the
volley.
Encouragements
and effort
This
category of self-talk refers to words or
statements that provide
self-encouragement to preserve or to
try
harder.
For example, in cricket, the
phrase "you can do it"
might be used by a batsman in preparation
for hitting
a
six.
Mood
words
This
category of self-talk refers to words
that precipitate an increase in mood or
arousal. Example: the mood
words
"hard" or "blast" might be
used in conjunction with a play in
football or soccer.
References
Cox,
H. Richard. (2002). Sport Psychology:
Concepts and Applications.
(Fifth Edition). New York:
McGraw-
Hill
Companies
Lavallec.
D., Kremer, J., Moran,
A., & Williams. M. (2004)
Sports Psychology: Contemporary Themes.
New
York:
Palgrave Macmillan
Publishers
7
Table of Contents:
|
|||||