ZeePedia

ATTITUDE CHANGE:Factors affecting dissonance, Likeability

<< ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR:Theory of planned behavior, Attitude strength
ATTITUDE CHANGE (CONTINUE……….):Attitudinal Inoculation, Audience Variables >>
img
Social Psychology (PSY403)
VU
Lesson 23
ATTITUDE CHANGE
Aims
Introduce the concept of attitude change
Objectives
·  Describe the motivational and external sources for changing attitudes
·  Describe source variables that influence the effectiveness of persuasive messages
Behaviour changing attitudes
From self-perception theory (Bem, 1965) we know that we can infer our attitudes from observing our
own behaviours (i.e., behaviours can cause attitudes)
Ours behaviours can also change attitudes, if they are unexpected...
Cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957)
A feeling of discomfort caused by performing an action that is inconsistent with one's attitudes
Principle of Cognitive consistency were first introduced by Fritz Heider (1946)
A motivational instead of a cognitive approach; has Gestalt roots that human beings not only expect and
prefer their perceptions to be coherent but they are motivated to do so.
Festinger maintained that instead of engaging in rational behaviour, we often engage in irrational and
maladaptive behavior, and much of the time we engage in rationalizing our behaviour.
Festinger & Carlsmith's study (1959)
Participants perform a boring task (emptying and filling trays; turning 48 wooden pegs)
Told to lie to next participant (it's a great task!)
$1 vs. $20 payment for lying
An interviewer then asks how fun and interesting you in fact found the tasks to be
Which condition will lead to greater favourability or attitude shift?
Findings are counter to what operant conditioning would suggest (attitudes rewarded more will be more
favourable)
BUT...$1 participants experienced a greater inconsistency (dissonance) between their attitude and
behaviour than $20 participants (and unpleasant state), i.e., `It was a boring task', `I told someone it was
fun'. Festinger maintained that like hunger dissonance is analogous to hunger in aversiveness.
The $1 participants have insufficient justification so the
only way to resolve the unpleasant inconsistency is to
Effects of payment on attitudes
change their attitude to be in line their behaviour (`The
to dull task
task was fun!')
Two inconsistent cognitions led to either adding a third
1.5
cognition or by changing attitude. We need to be able to
explain why we do things. The $20 participants can
1
explain their attitude behaviour inconsistency through
reward (the $20 was a sufficient justification for the
behaviour) by adding a 3rd cognition to explain their
0.5
counter attitudinal behaviour. However, $1 participants
changed their attitude to maintain consistency.
0
Factors affecting dissonance
-0.5
Justification; e.g., Doomsday cult group (as referred in
No payment-no $1 payment to $20 payment to
previous lectures) transformed the bad experience into a
lie (control)
lie
lie
good one to reduce dissonance
Freedom
of choice: e.g., if we are forced to do something this explains why we did it in contravention of
our attitudes, so it does not create dissonance.
89
img
Social Psychology (PSY403)
VU
Investment:
e.g., supporting a political party even when evidence of incompetence, immorality, etc.
escalates (refuse to accept evidence of impropriety because of all the time invested in believing the party's
ideals)
Cognitive dissonance and Persuasion
Cognitive dissonance is attitude change via an internal discrepancy
Persuasion is attitude change via an external message
Persuasion is the process of consciously attempting to change attitudes through the transmission of some
message.
Factors that influence the persuasiveness of a message
Source: Who is communicating?
Message variables: What is the content?
Audience: To whom the message is delivered?
Source Factors: Who is communicating?
Source credibility
·Expertise
·Trustworthiness
Source attractiveness
·Physical appearance
·Likeability
·Similarity
Source Factors: Credibility
"Propaganda, to be effective, must be delivered. To be delivered, it must be credible"
Expertise:
Bochner & Insko's study (1966): Written powerful statements claiming that about fewer than 8
hours' sleep is required for effective functioning and same statements were attributed to either to eminent
psychologists or YMCA director. Obviously, those people who were told that the statements were written
by the eminent psychologist believed more in the statements.
"We are not won by arguments that we can analyze but by tone and temper, by the manner which is the
man himself"
Trustworthiness:
Walster et al.'s study (1966) about the arguments of either a convicted criminal or a
judge about the importance of police's ability for maintaining law and order than the rights of criminals.
The criminal's arguments appeared more impressive to people because people who argue for actions that
benefit them are not trusted, hence they suffer from low credibility. In contrast, those who argue for actions
that are contrary to their vested interests have high credibility.
The `sleeper effect' low credibility as a discounting cue
The delayed effectiveness of a persuasive message from a noncredible source
Hovland & Weiss's study (1951)
Read article stating that nuclear submarines were safe
Author = Oppenheimer (nuclear physicist supervising the construction of atom bomb) vs. Pravda (Soviet
newspaper); (High vs. Low credibility for US students in 50's)
Persuasion is not very straightforward and uncomplicated; 4 weeks later credibility lost its effectiveness.
Other studies have also shown the delayed effects of credibility.
90
img
Social Psychology (PSY403)
VU
Immediate
effect - High credibility source --> greater persuasion; Tested 4 weeks later? not much
difference.
Explanation of the sleeper effect
The sleeper effect
Source memory:
·  Forgetfulness over time: i.e., over time,
High credibility
people  forget  where  the  source
26
source
24
originated from and only remember the
22
Low-credibility
content (so credibility of source would
20
source
have no effect) the credible source
18
16
became dissociated from the message
14
12
10
·
Explains increase in low credibility
8
source persuasion as well as decrease in
6
4
high credibility persuasion
2
0
·
Kelman & Hovlan (1953) replicated the
Immediate
Four weeks
original  experiment  but  reminded
Time interval
participants of the source before their
attitudes were reassessed. The sleeper
effect was removed.
Three factors that promote the sleeper effect (A meta-analysis of over 70 studies by Kumkale &
Albarrachin, 2004):
The message must be convincing enough in itself to lead to persuasion
Credibility information given after the message (or no processing of content will occur)
The low credibility source information decays faster than the message content
Source Factors: Attractiveness enhances persuasiveness
During 1920s when feminists were demonstrating against female inequality
Nephew of Freud, Edward Bernays, used attractive "liberated" women in an ad campaign for the cigarette
industry to serve as a "torch of freedom" symbol.
Women had a campaign with anti-smoking slogans in 1929 Easter parade in Manhattan.
Many women adopted the "torch of freedom habit
The cigarette company's profits soared with this newfound "liberated-female" market
Factors indicating attractiveness:
Physical appearance
Attractive university UG were more likely (41%) to persuade fellow students to sign a petition as
compared to less attractive (32%)
Commercials use central or peripheral route processing for persuasion. Usually attractive females are
used, who are consciously placed in commercials to attract male viewers and to induce positive feelings,
using the principle of classical conditioning, without even making the viewer conscious of this purpose.
That is why this is called peripheral route.
Likeability:
Merely saying nice things is enough to get people to like you (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993)
Similarity:
Communicators can be similar to their audience in a number of ways:
Sharing attitudes and values is the most important condition (Simons et al., 1970)
Similar backgrounds
Appearance
91
img
Social Psychology (PSY403)
VU
Reading
·  Franzoi, S. (2003). Social Psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Chapter 7.
Other Readings
·  Lord, C.G. (1997). Social Psychology. Orlando: Harcourt Brace and Company.
·  David G. Myers, D. G. (2002). Social Psychology (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
92
Table of Contents:
  1. INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:Readings, Main Elements of Definitions
  2. INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:Social Psychology and Sociology
  3. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:Scientific Method
  4. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:Evaluate Ethics
  5. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH PROCESS, DESIGNS AND METHODS (CONTINUED)
  6. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OBSERVATIONAL METHOD
  7. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY CORRELATIONAL METHOD:
  8. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
  9. THE SELF:Meta Analysis, THE INTERNET, BRAIN-IMAGING TECHNIQUES
  10. THE SELF (CONTINUED):Development of Self awareness, SELF REGULATION
  11. THE SELF (CONTINUE…….):Journal Activity, POSSIBLE HISTORICAL EFFECTS
  12. THE SELF (CONTINUE……….):SELF-SCHEMAS, SELF-COMPLEXITY
  13. PERSON PERCEPTION:Impression Formation, Facial Expressions
  14. PERSON PERCEPTION (CONTINUE…..):GENDER SOCIALIZATION, Integrating Impressions
  15. PERSON PERCEPTION: WHEN PERSON PERCEPTION IS MOST CHALLENGING
  16. ATTRIBUTION:The locus of causality, Stability & Controllability
  17. ATTRIBUTION ERRORS:Biases in Attribution, Cultural differences
  18. SOCIAL COGNITION:We are categorizing creatures, Developing Schemas
  19. SOCIAL COGNITION (CONTINUE…….):Counterfactual Thinking, Confirmation bias
  20. ATTITUDES:Affective component, Behavioral component, Cognitive component
  21. ATTITUDE FORMATION:Classical conditioning, Subliminal conditioning
  22. ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR:Theory of planned behavior, Attitude strength
  23. ATTITUDE CHANGE:Factors affecting dissonance, Likeability
  24. ATTITUDE CHANGE (CONTINUE……….):Attitudinal Inoculation, Audience Variables
  25. PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION:Activity on Cognitive Dissonance, Categorization
  26. PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION (CONTINUE……….):Religion, Stereotype threat
  27. REDUCING PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION:The contact hypothesis
  28. INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION:Reasons for affiliation, Theory of Social exchange
  29. INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION (CONTINUE……..):Physical attractiveness
  30. INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS:Applied Social Psychology Lab
  31. SOCIAL INFLUENCE:Attachment styles & Friendship, SOCIAL INTERACTIONS
  32. SOCIAL INFLUENCE (CONTINE………):Normative influence, Informational influence
  33. SOCIAL INFLUENCE (CONTINUE……):Crimes of Obedience, Predictions
  34. AGGRESSION:Identifying Aggression, Instrumental aggression
  35. AGGRESSION (CONTINUE……):The Cognitive-Neo-associationist Model
  36. REDUCING AGGRESSION:Punishment, Incompatible response strategy
  37. PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR:Types of Helping, Reciprocal helping, Norm of responsibility
  38. PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR (CONTINUE………):Bystander Intervention, Diffusion of responsibility
  39. GROUP BEHAVIOR:Applied Social Psychology Lab, Basic Features of Groups
  40. GROUP BEHAVIOR (CONTINUE…………):Social Loafing, Deindividuation
  41. up Decision GROUP BEHAVIOR (CONTINUE……….):GroProcess, Group Polarization
  42. INTERPERSONAL POWER: LEADERSHIP, The Situational Perspective, Information power
  43. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN COURT
  44. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN CLINIC
  45. FINAL REVIEW:Social Psychology and related fields, History, Social cognition