|
|||||
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
LESSON
38
JOB
DESIGN
Job
design is an important method managers
can use to enhance employee
performance. Job design is
how
organizations
define and structure jobs. Properly
designed jobs can have a
positive impact on the
motivation,
performance and job
satisfaction of those who
perform them. On the other hand
poorly
designed
jobs can impair motivation,
performance, and jobs
satisfaction
History
of Job Design
Until
the nineteenth century, many families
grew the things they needed, especially
food. General craft jobs
arose
as people ceased or reduced their
own food production, used
their labor to produce other
goods such
as
clothing and furniture, and
traded these goods for
food and other necessities.
Over time, people's
work
became
increasing specialized as they followed
this general pattern. For example, the
general craft of
clothing
production splintered into specialized
craft jobs such as weaving,
tailoring, and sewing.
This
revolution
towards specializing accelerated as the
Industrial Revolution swept
Europe in the 1700s
and
1800s,
followed by the United States in the
later 1800s.
The
trend toward specialization eventually
became a subject of formal study.
The two most
influential
students
of specialization were Adam Smith
and Charles Baggabe. Smith,
an eighteen-century Scottish
economist,
originated the phrase division of labor
in his classic book An
Inquiry into the Nature and
Causes
of
the Wealth of Nations, published in 1776.
The book tells the story of
a group of pin makers
who
specialized
their jobs to produce many
more per person in a day
than each could have
made by working
alone.
In
Smith's time, pin-making like
most other production work,
was still an individual job.
One person would
perform
all of the tasks required: drawing out a
strip of wire, clipping it to the proper
length, sharpening
one
end, attaching a head to the
other end, and polishing he
finished pin. With
specialization, one
person
did
nothing bud drew out wire,
another did the clipping and so
on. Smith attributed the
dramatic increases
in
output to factor such as
increased dexterity owing to
practice, decreased time changing
from one
production
operation to another and the development of
specialized equipment and machinery.
The basic
principles
described in the Wealth of Nations
provided the foundation for the
assembly line.
Charles
Babbage wrote On the Economy of Machinery
and Manufacturers in 1832. Extending
Smith's
work,
Babbage cited several
additional advantages of job
specialization: Relatively little time
was needed to
learn
specialized jobs, waste
decreased, workers needed to
make fewer tool and
equipment changes, and
workers'
skills improved through
frequent repetition of
tasks.
As
the Industrial Revolution spread to the
United States from Europe,
job specialization
proliferated
throughout
industry. It began in the mid-1880s
and reached its peak
with the development of scientific
management
in the early 1900s.
Fredrick
W. Taylor, the chief proponent of job
specialization, argued that jobs should
be scientifically
studied,
broken down into small
component tasks, and then
standardized across all
workers doing the
jobs.
Taylor's
view was consistent with the
premises of division of labor as
discussed by Smith and
Babbage.
In
50s and 60s Job
Rotation and Job Enlargement
were added to Job
Design.
Job
Rotation
Job
rotation involves systematically shifting
workers from one job to
another to sustain their
motivation
and
interest. Under specialization,
each task is broken down
into small parts. For
example, assembling
pens
might
involve four discrete steps:
testing the ink cartridge, inserting the
cartridge into the barrel of the
pen,
screwing
the cap onto the barrel, and inserting
the assembled pen into a
box. One worker performs each
of
these
four tasks. When job
rotation is introduced, the tasks
themselves stay the same.
However, the workers
who
perform them are systematically rotated
across the various
tasks.
Job
Enlargement
Job
enlargement, or horizontal job loading,
is expanding a worker's job to include tasks
previously
performed
by other workers. Before enlargement,
workers perform a single,
specialized task; afterward, they
have
a "larger" job to do.
It
has now developed into job
engineering where increasing the
efficiency of a job is stressed
Job
Enrichment
Job
Enrichment is a further development of JD
and JR, where opportunities
are provide to employees
to
achieve,
advance and grow. Job
rotation and job enlargement
seemed promising but eventually
disappointed
130
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
managers
seeking to counter the ill effects of
extreme specialization. They failed
partly because they
were
intuitive,
narrow approaches rather than
fully developed, theory-driven methods.
Consequently, a new,
more
complex approach to task design--job
enrichment--was development. It entails
giving workers more
tasks
to perform and more control
over how perform them.
Job enrichment programs are
also being
criticized
today due to certain
factors.
Method
of Job Design
Turner
and Lawrence's requisite
task attributes theory laid the
foundation for what is today the
dominant
framework
of defining task characteristics
and understanding their relationship to
employee motivation,
performance
and satisfaction: Hackman and Oldham's
job characteristic model (JCM). According
to JCM
any
job can be described in
terms of five core job
dimensions, defined as
follows:
Skill
Variety
It
is the degree to which the job
requires a variety of different activities so the
worker can use a number
of
different
skills and talents.
Task
Identity
The
degree to which the job
requires completion of a whole
and identifiable piece of
work.
Task
Significance
The
degree to which the job has a
substantial impact on the lives or
work of other people.
Autonomy
It
is the degree to which the job provides
substantial freedom, independence, and
discretion to the
individual
in scheduling the work and in determining
the procedures to be used in carrying it
out.
Feedback
The
degree to which carrying out the
work activities required by the job
results in the individual
obtaining
direct
and clear information about the
effectiveness of his or her
performance.
Result
The
five factors mentioned above in the
Job Characteristic Model
create three psychological
states that
motivate
workers. There are:
·
Meaningfulness
It
is the degree to which the individual
experiences the job as generally
meaningful, valuable, and
worthwhile.
This cognitive state
involves the degree to which
employees perceive their
work as making
a
valued contribution, as being important
and worthwhile.
·
Responsibility
It
is the degree to which individuals feel
personally accountable and
responsible for the results of
the
work.
This state is concerned with the extent
to which employee feels a
sense of being personally
responsible
or accountable for the work being
done.
·
Knowledge
of results
It
is the degree to which individuals
continuously understand how effectively
they are performing the
job.
Coming directly from the feedback, this
psychological state involves the
degree to which
employees
understand
how they are performing in the
job.
Guidelines
for Job Design
The
following suggestions, based on the
job characteristics model, specify the
types of changes in jobs
that
are
most likely to lead to
improving their
potential:
·
Combine
tasks. Managers
should seek to take existing and
fractionalized tasks and put them
back
together
to form a new and larger
module of work. This increases
skill variety and task
identity.
·
Create
natural work units. The
creation of natural work units means the
tasks an employee does
form
an
identifiable and meaningful whole. This
increases employee "ownership" of the
work and improves
the
likelihood that employees
will view their work ad
meaningful and important rather than as
irrelevant
and
boring.
·
Establish
client relationship. The
client is the user of the product or the
service that the
employee
works
on. Wherever possible,
managers should try to establish direct
relationships between workers
and
their
clients. This increases
skill variety, autonomy, and
feedback for the
employee.
·
Expand
jobs vertically. Vertical
expansion gives employees
responsibilities and control that
were
formerly
allocated to management. It seeks to
partially close the gap
between the "doing" and
the
"controlling"
aspects of the job, and it
increases employee
autonomy.
131
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
·
Open
feedback channels. By
increasing feedback, employees
not only learn how
well they are
performing
their jobs, but also whether
their performance is improving,
deteriorating, or remaining at a
constant
level. Ideally, this feedback bout
performance should be received directly as the
employee does
the
job, rather than from
management on an occasional
basis.
REFERENCES
·
Luthans,
Fred. (2005). Organizational Behaviour (Tenth
Edition). United States:
McGraw Hill Irwin.
·
Mejia,
Gomez. Balkin, David &
Cardy, Rober. (2006). Managing Human
Resources (Fourth
Edition).
India:
Dorling Kidersley Pvt. Ltd.,
licensee of Pearson Education in South
Asia.
·
Robbins,
P., Stephen. (1996). Organizational
Behaviour (Seventh Edition). India:
Prentice Hall, Delhi.
·
Huczynski,
Andrzej & Buchanan, David.
(1991). Organizational Behaviour: An Introductory
Text
(Second
Edition). Prentice Hall. New
York.
·
Moorhead,
Gregory & Griffin, Ricky. (2001).
Organizational Behaviour (First Edition).
A.I.T.B.S.
Publishers
& Distributors. Delhi.
FURTHER
READING
·
Employee
motivation; Motivation in the workplace-
theory and practice:
http://www.accel-team.com/work_design/index.html
·
Job
Design:
http://www.jobquality.ca/indicator_e/des.stm
·
Motivation
and Job Design, from
California State
University:
http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/whitepaper.aspx?docid=85827
·
Guidelines
on Job Design and Work
Allocation: http://
www.shef.ac.uk/content/1/c6/05/18/99/Guidelines%20on%20Job%20Design%20and%20Work%20
Allocation.pdf
132
Table of Contents:
|
|||||