|
|||||
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
LESSON
26
SELF
EFFICACY
Self
efficacy refers to an individual's
belief that he or she is
capable of performing a task.
The higher your
self-efficacy,
the more confidence you have in
your ability to succeed in a
task. So, in difficult
situations, we
find
that people with low
self-efficacy are more
likely to lessen their
effort or give up altogether
whereas
those
with high self-efficacy will
try harder to master the
challenge. In addition, individuals
high in self-
efficacy
seem to respond to negative
feedback with increased
effort and motivation; those
low in self-
efficacy
are likely to lessen their
effort when given negative
feedback.
The
concept of Self Efficacy was developed by
Albert Bandura. He has
defined self-efficacy as our
belief in
our
ability to succeed in specific
situations. Your sense of
self-efficacy can play a major role in
how you
approach
goals, tasks, and
challenges. The concept of
self-efficacy lies at the center
Bandura's social
cognitive
theory, which emphasizes the
role of observational learning and social
experience in the
development
of personality. According to Bandura's
theory, people with high
self-efficacy - that is,
those
who
believe they can perform
well - are more likely to
view difficult tasks as
something to be mastered
rather
than something to be avoided.
Self-efficacy
is different from self
esteem which is one's evaluation of
self. It is the extent to which a
person
believes
he or she is a worthwhile and
deserving individual. Self-efficacy is
different from expectancy
where
expectancy
revolves around expected consequences of
one's behavior. Self
efficacy and locus of
control/attribution
is different where attribution/locus
are causal judgments, SE is
about one's self
Self-efficacy
beliefs determine how people
feel, think, motivate
themselves and behave. Such
beliefs
produce
these diverse effects
through four major processes. They
include cognitive, motivational, affective
and
selection processes.
A
strong sense of efficacy
enhances human accomplishment
and personal well-being in many
ways. People
with
high assurance in their
capabilities approach difficult
tasks as challenges to be mastered rather
than as
threats
to be avoided. Such an efficacious
outlook fosters intrinsic
interest and deep
engrossment in
activities.
They set themselves
challenging goals and maintain strong
commitment to them. They heighten
and
sustain their efforts in the
face of failure. They quickly recover
their sense of efficacy after
failures or
setbacks.
They attribute failure to insufficient
effort or deficient knowledge and
skills which are
acquirable.
They
approach threatening situations with
assurance that they can
exercise control over them.
Such an
efficacious
outlook produces personal
accomplishments, reduces stress
and lowers vulnerability
to
depression.
In
contrast, people who doubt
their capabilities shy away
from difficult tasks which
they view as personal
threats.
They have low aspirations
and weak commitment to the goals they
choose to pursue. When
faced
with
difficult tasks, they dwell on
their personal deficiencies, on the
obstacles they will encounter, and
all
kinds
of adverse outcomes rather than
concentrate on how to perform
successfully. They slacken
their
efforts
and give up quickly in the face of
difficulties. They are slow to
recover their sense of
efficacy
following
failure or setbacks. Because they
view insufficient performance as
deficient aptitude it does
not
require
much failure for them to
lose faith in their
capabilities. They fall easy
victim to stress and
depression.
General
self-efficacy: stable
over time and
situations
Specific
self-efficacy: specific
to task
Impact
of Self Efficacy
Choice
of behavior
People
are partly the product of
their environment. Therefore, beliefs of
personal efficacy can shape
the
course
lives take by influencing the
types of activities and environments people
choose. People avoid
activities
and situations they believe
exceed their coping capabilities.
But they readily undertake
challenging
activities
and select situations they
judge themselves capable of handling. By
the choices they make, people
cultivate
different competencies, interests
and social networks that
determine life courses. Any
factor that
influences
choice behavior can
profoundly affect the direction of
personal development. This is because
the
social
influences operating in selected environments continue
to promote certain competencies,
values, and
interests
long after the efficacy decisional
determinant has rendered its inaugurating
effect.
Career
choice and development is but
one example of the power of self-efficacy
beliefs to affect the course
of
life paths through
choice-related processes. The higher the
level of people's perceived self-efficacy
the
91
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
wider
the range of career options they
seriously consider, the greater
their interest in them, and
the better
they
prepare themselves educationally for the
occupational pursuits they choose and the
greater is their
success.
Motivation
Self-beliefs
of efficacy play a key role
in the self-regulation of motivation. Most
human motivation is
cognitively
generated. People motivate
themselves and guide their
actions anticipatorily by the exercise
of
forethought.
They form beliefs about what they can
do. They anticipate likely
outcomes of prospective
actions.
They set goals for
themselves and plan courses of action
designed to realize valued
futures.
There
are three different forms of
cognitive motivators around which
different theories have been
built.
They
include causal attributions, outcome
expectancies, and cognized
goals. The corresponding theories
are
attribution
theory, expectancy-value theory
and goal theory,
respectively. Self-efficacy beliefs
operate in each
of
these types of cognitive
motivation. Self-efficacy beliefs
influence causal attributions. People
who regard
themselves
as highly efficacious attribute
their failures to insufficient
effort, those who regard
themselves as
inefficacious
attribute their failures to
low ability. Causal
attributions affect motivation,
performance and
affective
reactions mainly through beliefs of
self-efficacy.
In
expectancy-value theory, motivation is
regulated by the expectation that a given
course of behavior
will
produce
certain outcomes and the
value of those outcomes. But
people act on their beliefs about what
they
can
do, as well as on their
beliefs about the likely
outcomes of performance. The
motivating influence of
outcome
expectancies is thus partly governed by
self-beliefs of efficacy. There are
countless attractive
options
people do not pursue because they
judge they lack the capabilities
for them. The predictiveness
of
expectancy-value
theory is enhanced by including the
influence of perceived self-
efficacy.
Perseverance
It
requires a strong sense of
efficacy to remain task
oriented in the face of pressing
situational demands,
failures
and setbacks that have
significant repercussions. Indeed, when people
are faced with the tasks
of
managing
difficult environmental demands under
taxing circumstances, those who
are beset by self-doubts
about
their efficacy become more
and more erratic in their
analytic thinking, lower
their aspirations and
the
quality
of their performance deteriorates. In
contrast, those who maintain a resilient
sense of efficacy set
themselves
challenging goals and use
good analytic thinking which
pays off in
performance
accomplishments.
Thoughts
Perceived
self-efficacy to control thought
processes is a key factor in regulating
thought produced stress
and
depression.
It is not the sheer frequency of
disturbing thoughts but the perceived
inability to turn them
off
that
is the major source of distress. Both
perceived coping self-efficacy and
thought control efficacy
operate
jointly
to reduce anxiety and avoidant
behavior.
Low
self efficacy can lead
people to believe tasks are harder
than they actually are. This
often results in poor
task
planning, as well as increased
stress. Observational evidence shows
that people become erratic
and
unpredictable
when engaging in a task in which they
have low efficacy. On the other
hand, people with
high
self
efficacy often take a wider
picture of a task in order to take the
best route of action. People
with high
self
efficacy are shown to be
encouraged by obstacles to greater
effort. Self efficacy also
affects how people
respond
to failure. A person with a
high efficacy will attribute
the failure to external factors, where a
person
with
low self efficacy will
attribute failure to low
ability.
Vulnerability
to stress
People's
beliefs in their coping capabilities
affect how much stress and
depression they experience in
threatening
or difficult situations, as well as
their level of motivation. Perceived
self-efficacy to exercise
control
over stressors plays a
central role in anxiety arousal.
People who believe they can
exercise control
over
threats do not conjure up disturbing
thought patterns. But those
who believe they cannot
manage
threats
experience high anxiety arousal. They
dwell on their coping deficiencies. They
view many aspects of
their
environment as fraught with
danger. They magnify the severity of
possible threats and worry
about
things
that rarely happen. Through
such inefficacious thinking they distress
themselves and impair
their
level
of functioning. Perceived coping
self-efficacy regulates avoidance
behavior as well as anxiety
arousal.
The
stronger the sense of self-efficacy the
bolder people are in taking on
taxing and threatening
activities.
Sources
of Self-Efficacy
People's
beliefs about their efficacy
can be developed by four main
sources of influence.
92
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
Mastery
experience/ performance leading to
attainment
The
most effective way of creating a
strong sense of efficacy is
through mastery experiences.
Successes
build
a robust belief in one's personal
efficacy. Failures undermine it,
especially if failures occur before
a
sense
of efficacy is firmly
established.
If
people experience only easy
successes they come to expect
quick results and are
easily discouraged by
failure.
A resilient sense of efficacy requires
experience in overcoming obstacles
through perseverant
effort.
Some
setbacks and difficulties in
human pursuits serve a
useful purpose in teaching
that success usually
requires
sustained effort. After people
become convinced they have what it takes
to succeed, they persevere
in
the face of adversity and
quickly rebound from
setbacks. By sticking it out through
tough times, they
emerge
stronger from adversity.
Modeling,
seeing people
The
second way of creating and
strengthening self-beliefs of efficacy is
through the vicarious
experiences
provided
by social models. Seeing people
similar to oneself succeed by
sustained effort raises
observers'
beliefs
that they too possess the
capabilities master comparable activities
to succeed. By the same
token,
observing
others' fail despite high
effort lowers observers'
judgments of their own
efficacy and
undermines
their
efforts. The impact of modeling on
perceived self-efficacy is strongly influenced by
perceived similarity
to
the models. The greater the
assumed similarity the more persuasive
are the models' successes
and failures.
If
people see the models as very different
from themselves their
perceived self-efficacy is not
much
influenced
by the models' behavior and the
results its produces.
Modeling
influences do more than provide a
social standard against which to
judge one's own
capabilities.
People
seek proficient models who
possess the competencies to which they
aspire. Through their
behavior
and
expressed ways of thinking,
competent models transmit knowledge and
teach observers effective
skills
and
strategies for managing
environmental demands. Acquisition of
better means raises perceived
self-
efficacy.
Social
persuasion
Social
persuasion is a third way of
strengthening people's beliefs that they
have what it takes to
succeed.
People
who are persuaded verbally
that they possess the capabilities to
master given activities are likely
to
mobilize
greater effort and sustain
it than if they harbor self-doubts and
dwell on personal
deficiencies
when
problems arise. To the extent that
persuasive boosts in perceived
self-efficacy lead people to try
hard
enough
to succeed, they promote development of
skills and a sense of
personal efficacy.
It
is more difficult to instill
high beliefs of personal
efficacy by social persuasion
alone than to undermine
it.
Unrealistic
boosts in efficacy are
quickly disconfirmed by disappointing
results of one's efforts.
But people
who
have been persuaded that
they lack capabilities tend to
avoid challenging activities that
cultivate
potentialities
and give up quickly in the face of
difficulties. By constricting activities and
undermining
motivation,
disbelief in one's capabilities creates
its own behavioral
validation.
Physical/psychological
arousal
People
also rely partly on their
somatic and emotional states
in judging their capabilities. They
interpret their
stress
reactions and tension as signs of
vulnerability to poor performance. In
activities involving strength
and
stamina, people judge their fatigue,
aches and pains as signs of
physical debility. Mood also
affects
people's
judgments of their personal efficacy.
Positive mood enhances perceived
self-efficacy, despondent
mood
diminishes it. The fourth
way of modifying self-beliefs of
efficacy is to reduce people's
stress
reactions
and alter their negative
emotional proclivities and is
interpretations of their physical
states.
It
is not the sheer intensity of emotional
and physical reactions that
is important but rather how they
are
perceived
and interpreted. People who
have a high sense of
efficacy are likely to view
their state of affective
arousal
as an energizing facilitator of
performance, whereas those
who are beset by self-
doubts regard their
arousal
as a debilitator. Physiological indicators of
efficacy play an especially influential
role in health
functioning
and in athletic and other
physical activities.
Implications
for Workplace
Self
Efficacy has the following implications
for workplace:
1.
High SE people show 28% more
performance than controls
2.
High SE people are frequently
hired by HRD people
3.
Training is imparted for developing
SE
4.
Stress management is being done by
training in high SE
5.
Leadership training involves developing
high SE
93
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
REFERENCES
·
Bandura,
A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S.
Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human
behavior (Vol.
4,
pp. 71-81). New York:
Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman
[Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental
health.
San Diego: Academic Press,
1998).
·
Luthans,
Fred. (2005). Organizational Behaviour (Tenth
Edition). United States:
McGraw Hill Irwin.
·
Mejia,
Gomez. Balkin, David &
Cardy, Rober. (2006). Managing Human
Resources (Fourth
Edition).
India:
Dorling Kidersley Pvt. Ltd.,
licensee of Pearson Education in South
Asia.
·
Robbins,
P., Stephen. (1996). Organizational
Behaviour (Seventh Edition). India:
Prentice Hall, Delhi.
·
Huczynski,
Andrzej & Buchanan, David.
(1991). Organizational Behaviour: An Introductory
Text
(Second
Edition). Prentice Hall. New
York.
·
Moorhead,
Gregory & Griffin, Ricky. (2001).
Organizational Behaviour (First Edition).
A.I.T.B.S.
Publishers
& Distributors. Delhi.
·
Pajares,
F., & Urdan, T. (Eds.).
(2006). Adolescence and
education, Vol. 5: Self-Efficacy Beliefs
of
Adolescents.
Greenwich, CT: Information Age
Publishing.
·
Seifert,
Timothy L., Understanding Student
Motivation. Memorial University of
Newfoundland, St
John's,
Newfoundland. 2004
FURTHER
READING
·
Christine
Galbreath Jernigan, What do
Students Expect to Learn? The
Role of Learner
Expectancies,
Beliefs,
and
Attributions
for
Success
and
Failure
in
Student
Motivation.:
http://cie.asu.edu/volume7/number4/index.html
·
http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/self-efficacy.html
·
http://www.positivepractices.com/Efficacy/SelfEfficacy.html
·
Information
on Self-Efficacy; A Community of Scholars:
http://des.emory.edu/mfp/self-efficacy.html
94
Table of Contents:
|
|||||