|
|||||
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
LESSON
18
ATTITUDE
Attitude
is a mental position relative to a way of
thinking, behaving or leaning toward
that which you
believe.
It is the way a person thinks about
somebody or something and the
way she behaves
toward
someone.
It is her personal view or
opinion of something. It also
describes her general
emotional approach
to
any person or situation.
From
a personal development standpoint, attitude is broader
than this popular usage. A
positive attitude
implies
a way of thinking that is
predominantly positive and optimistic.
The opposite inclination, a
negative
attitude
is predominantly pessimistic.
Components
of Attitude
Attitude
has three components,
namely:
1.
Emotional
The
emotional component represents a person's
feelings towards an object. In other
words, it is the
disposition
towards something. For
example, a sales representative
behaves in a positive manner
with
his
clients. He feels that the
client can do good to him by
making a purchase, therefore he has a
positive
emotional
component.
2.
Informational
The
informational component consists of the
information, idea or beliefs
that a person has about
the
object.
For example, if someone
feels that his partner can
not play cricket very well, he would not
let
him
take charge if needed. Therefore, the
belief plays the role of determining the
informational
component.
3.
Behavioural
The
behavioural component represents how a
person actually behaves. It
consists of cognitive
and
affective
(values & beliefs) parts.
Our beliefs and values
are combined with our
cognitive component;
thus,
two components (affective and cognitive)
give us our long range or
persistent measurements
for
dealing
with the world.
While
a person may have the
competency to perform a task,
that does not mean he or
she will have the
desire
(attitude) to do so correctly. In other words,
competencies give us the ability to
perform, while
attitudes
give us the desire to perform. Attitudes
change with various events
in a person's life.
These
emotional
changes also vary in length of
time.
Positive
and Negative Affectivity
Positive
Affectivity (PA)
It
may be defined as a sense of
well being, pleasantly
involved in life and having
positive attitudes. Positive
attitude,
positive thinking, and optimism
are now known to be a root
cause of many positive life
benefits--
the
good life and well being.
You'll live longer and be healthier
and happier with a positive
attitude toward
life.
In addition, you're more likely to be
successful if you learn to
use the power of thinking
positive,
adopting
positive attitudes, and
affirmations to gain important
life benefits.
A
positive attitude and
optimistic thinking early in
life predict health and well being in
later years. Analysis
of
99 Harvard graduates found a strong
correlation between their
optimistic thinking as college
students
and
good health at age 40 and
above.
In
his ground-breaking book, A Primer in Positive
Psychology, Christopher Petersen, PhD,
says,
"...optimism
has demonstrable benefits,
and pessimism has
drawbacks." He goes on to
say,
"...optimism...has
been linked to positive mood
and good morale; to
perseverance and effective
problem
solving;
to academic, athletic, military,
occupational, and political
success; to popularity; to good health;
and
even
to long life and freedom
from trauma."
Even
if a person has been a
pessimistic, negative thinker
for many years, it is never
too late to change
the
way
of thinking and reap the benefits of a
positive attitude. Optimists believe they
are accountable for
good
things
and that good things will
generally come their way. If
something bad comes instead,
optimists tend to
write
it off as an isolated incident, an
anomaly, or something out of
their control; optimists believe
things
will
be better in the future.
Negative
Affectivity (NA)
It
is the state of being nervous, tense,
worried, distressed and
pessimistic. Negative affectivity
(NA) has
been
defined as reflecting individual
differences in negative emotion
and self concept (Watson
& Clark,
62
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
1984).
It has been argued that NA
may affect perceived levels of
stress by influencing perceptions of
the
self
or environment. Accordingly, individuals
found to be high in NA tend to
report higher levels of
dissatisfaction
and perceived stress, when
compared with individuals
who have lower levels of
NA.
Although
there is strong empirical evidence
linking NA to psychological well-being
outcomes some authors
have
suggested that this relationship
originates out of a tendency of
those individuals high in NA to
respond
to
self report methodologies with an
overall negative perception.
Moyle
(1995), in a comprehensive analysis of
the effects of NA on a number of outcome
measures, found
that
negative affectivity did not
universally affect all outcomes in a similar
manner. Instead she found
that
NA
functioned in a number of different ways
to influence outcomes. Moyle noted
that NA was not
simply
a
generic nuisance variable but rather it
played a complex and substantive
role within the stress
process.
Functions
of Attitude
Adjustment
Function
Attitudes
help employees in organizations to
adjust to the organizational environment.
For example, if an
employee
finds his job satisfying
and develops a positive
attitude towards it, he or
she is more likely to
adjust
with the organizational environment as
compared to the one who has
developed a negative attitude
towards
the job or the organization.
Ego
Defence Function
Attitude
defines and defends self
image. A person may make a
poor decision and stick to
it despite warnings
and
in the process, develop a negative
attitude towards the one who
had warned him, considering
him
inexperienced
and irreverent. Hence, later this
attitude would protect the
ego of the person when he
shall
refuse
to listen to the warnings.
Value
Expressive Function
Attitudes
towards certain things help in expressing
the values possessed. A person,
who has a strong
negative
attitude towards a liar, has
his values of not telling a
lie represented by this attitude.
Knowledge
function
Attitude
helps to understand and explain the
world. A person may have
negative attitude towards a
group
and
therefore consider everything said or done by
that group to be wrong or threatening. He
has developed
a
frame of reference to assay the
group which is a function of
his attitude.
Changing
Attitudes
Changing
attitudes in organizations and in
general is a difficult task; however,
modification of existing
attitudes
is much easier.
The
first step in trying to
change or modify attitudes is to
identify the barriers in it and
demolish them. The
common
barriers are as
follows:
Prior
Commitment
Prior
commitment of people prevents attitudinal
change in them. It is actually
disposition towards
certain
beliefs.
For example, a graduate from
a foreign university would often be
considered suitable for a
number
of
jobs irrespective of his
interest and aptitude, based on the
belief that he or she is a
foreign qualified
person.
This belief may be harmful
for the organization. It is actually a
prior commitment of the hiring
people.
Insufficient
Information
Another
barrier to bringing about attitudinal
change is insufficiency of information.
People do not find
sufficient
reasons for changing their
attitude which may become a hindrance in
changing attitudes.
How
to Change Attitudes
Find
prior commitment, break it
Probably
most overlooked is this strategy.
Most often we forget that
one of the reasons people don't
change
their
attitude is that they have
made a conscious or subconscious
prior commitment. Uncovering
those
hidden
agendas usually results in an
opportunity to change one's
attitude about previous
commitments.
Even
stability can be a prior commitment
and until I understand that
this new change, method or
system is
going
to produce stability--I am not willing to
let go of what is stable.
Provide
new/different information
Often,
people don't see or feel the need to
change. Providing information to
support change or the need
to
change
can often open previously closed
doors. Communicating change initiatives
prior to implementation
is
often scary but almost
always better than not doing
it until the implementation
begins.
63
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
Use
fear/ punishment
Fear
can be positive if we take the time to
frame it correctly. Fear of some
sort, often creates the
urgency
needed
for change to take place
and for change gaps to be
bridged, but the key to using
fear is to show how
the
present path is not the best
one. You don't just threaten
people by stating if they don't do it they
will
suffer
the consequences. You use a
combination of tactics to show
with information how the
present
direction
will lead to lower levels of
benefits and more sacrifice than
changing directions--personally or
organizationally.
Influence
friends/family
One
of the major reasons--in my view--for
using 360 degree assessment
is so that someone can get
hit over
the
head by people whose opinions
often matter--saving leadership
from doing it. While this
may be the
crass
side of 360, it does work
because of the influence of friends and
peers. 360s certainly have
weaknesses
and
used solely for the purpose
of changing attitudes is probably
more harmful than helpful in the
"long
term."
However, a structured ongoing program of
development that includes regular
360 assessments and
training
can be effective in changing
attitudes.
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy
is actually the treatment of mental and
emotional disorders using
psychological methods.
Psychotherapy,
thus, does not include physiological
interventions, such as drug therapy or
electroconvulsive
therapy
, although it may be used in
combination with such
methods. Behavior therapy aims to help
the
patient
eliminate undesirable habits or
irrational fears through
conditioning. Humanistic therapy tends to
be
more
optimistic, basing its treatment on the
theory that individuals have
a natural inclination to strive
toward
self-fulfillment. Therapists such as
Carl Rogers and Abraham
Maslow used a highly
interactive
client-therapist
relationship, compelling clients to realize
exactly what they are saying or
how they are
behaving,
in order to foster a sense of
self-awareness. Cognitive therapies
try to show the client that
certain,
usually
negative, thoughts are irrational,
with the goal of restructuring such
thoughts into positive,
constructive
ideas. Such methods include
Albert Ellis's rational-emotive therapy,
where the therapist argues
with
the client about his
negative ideas.
Psychotherapy
may be brief, lasting just a
few sessions, or it may extend over
many years. More than
one
client
may be involved, as in marriage or
family counselling, or a number of
individuals, as in group
psychotherapy.
Cooperate,
involve in decision
making
Giving
people--whose attitude is deviant from
the norm--leadership opportunity can
often lead to
positive
change
for the person and the organization.
Some say resistance is
energy and this resistant
energy occurs
often
in the form of challenging attitudes
and opposition--disagreeableness. Yet,
often this energy can
be
harnessed
to propel the organization forward while
leading to attitudinal change in the
opposition.
Seek
first to understand
An
age old maxim made
popular by Stephen Covey's 7
habits, empathy like
compassion forces us to
take
the
view of the opposing force and to attempt to
understand the reasons for the
resistance. Much has
been
written
about this "soft" skill but
by far, the caring sense
that someone expresses authentically
towards
another
person removes barriers to
changes in attitudes. Empathy
creates openings for new
information
and
influence to reach through previously locked
doors.
Resolve
cognitive dissonance.
Most
often, each of us has a
dialectic taking place
inside ourselves about our
attitudes and about the
results
of
our behaviors. To resolve this
dissonance or conflict can
often lead to positive
changes in attitudes for
us
personally
as well as in organizations. People
are certain that their
behavior always works, yet
must often
protect
that faulty behavior with an
attitude. Helping them to understand the
conflict between their
attitude
and
the behavior can lead to positive
change.
REFERENCES
·
Jung,
C.G. (1966). Two Essays on
Analytical Psychology, Collected
Works, Volume 7, Princeton,
NJ:
Princeton University Press. ISBN
0-691-01782-4.
·
Jung,
C.G. [1921] (1971). Psychological
Types, Collected Works, Volume 6,
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton
University Press. ISBN
0-691-01813-8.
·
Myers, I. B.
& Myers, P. B. (1980), Gifts
Differing", Palo Alto, CA:
Consulting
64
Organizational
Psychology (PSY510)
VU
·
Attitude
and change: Encyclopaedia
Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attitude_(psychology)
FURTHER
READING
·
What
is an Attitude?
http://www.lessons4living.com/what_is_an_attitude.htm
·
Ostrom,
M. Thomas; Ohio State
University. Theory and
Measurement:
http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=57161271
65
Table of Contents:
|
|||||