|
|||||
Introduction
to Psychology PSY101
VU
Lesson
34
INTELLIGENCE
Gardner's
Theory of Multiple Intelligences
·Given
by Howard Gardner in
1985
·He
entirely disagreed with the
theorists who gave importance to
factor analysis, except one
thing that is
common
and found in his and the
former theories is that intelligence is
the composition of many specific
abilities
·The
theory maintains that intelligence
consists of eight independent intelligences
that vary in degree
among
individuals;
it includes the potential of solving the
problems or creating products
that can be valued
within
one
or more than one cultural
settings
·Maintains
that humans possess around eight kinds of
intelligences, they are
·
Linguistics
·
Logical
mathematical
·
Spatial
intelligence
·
Musical
intelligence
·
Bodily
kinesthetic
·
Interpersonal
intelligenceIntrapersonal
intelligence
·
Naturalistic
intelligence
Sternberg's
Triarchic Theory of
Development
·Given
by American psychologist, Robert Sternberg, in
1980s, which is similar to Gardner's
theory of
intelligence.
·He
observed that mental tests
sometimes do not accurately predict
success or failure in
reality.
·According
to his triarchic or three- dimensional theory,
intelligence consists of three main
components:
·
Analytic
intelligence
·
Creative
intelligence
·
Practical
intelligencePiaget's
View of Intelligence:·Intellectual
development can be defined
in
terms of qualitative changes in
thinking which are clearly
apparent in children of particular
age.
·His
theory is more concerned
with the universal patterns of
intellectual development and functioning.
He
maintained
a comprehensive theory that
emphasized on `how' children acquire
knowledge and use it to
solve
logical problems
·He
was more interested in how
children exhibit intelligence in
different stages of life as he proposed
the
four
stages of cognitive development, which he
termed as universal and
invariant (occurring in the same
sequence).
The stages are: sensorimotor,
preoperational, concrete operational and
formal operational.
Hierarchical
Theory of Intelligence
·Given
by Carroll 1986 and Vernon
1971.
·Their
hierarchy consists of three
levels.
·At
the highest level, there is general
intelligence or "g" factor as given by
Spearman.
·In
the second level, are the factors of
primary mental abilities as identified by
Thurstone.
·At
the third level, there
are specific abilities or
factors underlying
intelligenceMeasurement
of
Intelligence
·
Intelligence
of a person can be measured
through intelligence tests.
The use of a battery of
tests
is preferred over a single
test
The
History of Measurement of Intelligence
·
Man
was always interested in knowing
their own ability level, or
in other words
the
intelligence,
as well as that of
others.
·
People
looked for capable persons
while searching for
life-mates, companions,
workers,
architects,
artists, and poets or
authors.
·
Even
in case of chefs, tailors,
carpenters, or barbers, those
with the fine skill
and the ability
to
generate
unique ideas were
preferred.
198
Introduction
to Psychology PSY101
VU
·
In
the olden times, observation
and previous experience were
the only ways to judge a
person's
capability
or
intelligence
level.
The
prevalent, modern, approaches to
measure intelligence are
based upon the contribution
of
Alfred
Binet.
·
The
first formal measure of
intelligence was developed by French
psychologist Alfred
Binet
and
Theodore Simon, in 1905 in
France.
·
The
test or the scale was
developed in order to assist
the education ministry and
department in
identifying
"dull" students in the Paris
school system, so that they
could be provided
remedial
aid.
The
main idea was that
intelligence can be measured in terms of
performance of a child
·
If
performance on certain tasks,
that were the test
items, improved with age
then it could be
taken
as an indication of intelligence of a
person.
·
By
developing tasks on which
people's performance improved
with age, a measure could
be
devised
which could distinguish
intelligent people from
those not
intelligent.
·
Using
the same concept Binet
developed the first
intelligence test in 1905.
The test could
identify
more intelligent children
within a particular age
group. It could differentiate
intelligent
children
from the less intelligent
ones.
·
The
test was devised for
locating the `dullest'
students in the Paris school
system so that
remedial
assistance could be provided to
them before they were
denied instruction.
The
Testing Procedure Adopted by Binet and
Simon
·
Initially
Binet developed a number of
tasks.
·
Then
he took groups of students
who were categorized or
labeled as `dull' or `bright' by
their
teachers.
·
The
tasks were presented to
them. The tasks that
could be completed by the
`bright' students
were
retained; the rest were
discarded.
·
The
idea was to retain tasks
that could be completed by
the bright students, as
these were
considered
to be indicative of the child's
intelligence.
·
With
further work, dull or bright
children could be identified
with reference to their
age.
·
The
scale could, thus, identify
bright or dull students
within particular age
groups.
Here
are some sample items from Simon-Binet
Test (1911)
Three
years
Shows
nose, eyes and mouth.
Repeats two digits. Describes
objects in a picture. Gives family name.
Repeats
a
sentence of six
syllables.
Four
years
Gives
own sex. Names key, knife,
and penny. Repeats three
digits. Compares the length of two
lines.
Five
years
Compares
two weights. Copies a
square. Repeats a sentence of ten
syllables. Counts four
pennies.
Six
years
Distinguishes
between morning and
afternoon. Defines objects in terms of
their use. Copies a
shape.
Counts
13 pennies. Compares faces
from the aesthetic point of
view.
Seven
years
Identifies
right hand and left ear.
Describes a picture. Follows precise
directions. Names four
colors.
Eight
years
Compares
two remembered objects.
Counts from 20 to 0. Indicates omissions
in pictures. Gives day
and
date.
Repeats five digits.
199
Introduction
to Psychology PSY101
VU
Fifteen
years
Repeats
seven digits. Gives three rhymes.
Repeats a sentence of 26 syllables.
Interprets a picture. Solves a
problem
from several facts
Later
Revisions
·
The
original Binet- Simon scale
was revised a number of
times.
·
The
American psychologist, Lewis
Terman gave the first
Stanford revision of the
scale in 1916.
·
These
revision comparison American
standards from age 3 to
adulthood.
·
Further
revisions were made in 1937
and 1960.
·
Stanford-
Binet is one of the most
widely used tests even
today.
The
Concept of Mental
Age
·
Children
taking the Binet- Simon
test were assigned a score
that corresponded to the
age
group
they belonged to.
·
This
score indicated their
"mental age".
·
Mental
age referred to the average
age o children who secured
the same score.
·
Mental
age can be understood as the
typical intelligence level
found for people at a
given
chronological
age.
Mental
age of a person can be
different from his or her
chronological age i.e., it can be
above or below that.
It
could reflect whether or not a child was
performing at a level at which his
age mates were.
BUT
it gave rise to a problem. How could we
compare people belonging to different
age groups?
Will
a 20 year old with a mental
age of 23 be equally intelligent as an 8
year old having a mental age
of
11?The
problem becomes more serious
when we are talking of comparing those
below their mental age
e.g.
comparing
an 8 year old operating at a mental
age of 5, with a 20 year old
operating at a mental age of 17
The
Concept of Intelligence Quotient or IQ
·
As
a result of problems with
depending merely on mental
age, a solution was devised in
terms
of
intelligent quotient, a concept
whereby the chronological
age of the person is also
given due
consideration.
Intelligence
Quotient: IQ
·
An
indicator or measure of intelligent
that considers a person's
mental as well as
chronological
age.
·
The
formula for IQ:
IQ
score= MA/ CA x 100
Using
This Formula Means
That
·
If
the mental and chronological
age of a person is the same,
then he or she will have an IQ
of
100.
If one is below his
chronological age then the
IQ will fall below 100 and
vice versa.
Deviation
IQ Scores
·
Psychologists
kept working on the concept
of IQ and made amendments in
the primary
concept
of IQ.
·
Today,
although the main concept of
calculating IQ is still adhered
to, we talk in terms
of
Deviation
IQ scores.
·
Deviation
IQ scores are
based upon sophisticated
statistical techniques. The
average score of a
group
is kept in mind, and the IQ
of the person taking an IQ
test is stated with
reference to the
points
with which he deviates from
the average.
200
Introduction
to Psychology PSY101
VU
Available
Statistics Show That
·
Around
two- thirds or 66% of the
population fall within a
range of 15 IQ points from
the
average
IQ score of 100 i.e., the majority of
people have an IQ between 85
and 115.
The
Meaning of IQ Test
Scores
IQ
score
Rating
<
70
Retarded
85
Borderline
100
Average
Above
115
Superior
Above
140
Gifted
IQ
Tests
Today
a number of IQ tests are
available.
·
But
before choosing a test for
assessing a subject's intelligence,
and considering it a
trustworthy
device, the psychologist has
to make sure that the
test is:
·
Valid
·
Reliable,
and
·
Standardized
Stanford-Binet
Test (4th Ed.)
·
Last
revised 1985.
·
Contains
a series of test items that
vary in nature according to
the subject's age.
·
For
example a child may is asked
to copy figures or answer
questions about everyday
life
activities.
·
Older
subjects solve analogies,
explain proverbs, or describe
similarities underlying sets
of
words.
Administration
of Stanford-Binet test
·
Individual-oral
administration.
·
The
examiner begins from a
mental level at which he
finds out the subject to
be.
·
Items
from succeeding levels are
asked.
·
The
test ends when they
reach a level where no items
are successfully
attempted.
·
IQ
is computed by by examining the
pattern of correct and
incorrect responses of the
subject.
Wechsler
Adult Intelligence
Scale-Revised
WAIS-R
and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for
children-III: WISC-III
WAIS-R
and WISC-III
·
Psychologist
David Wechsler developed
both.
·
The
two tests consist of two
major parts:
201
Introduction
to Psychology PSY101
VU
i.
Verbal
part/scale
ii.
Performance
or non verbal
part/scale
Verbal
scale
·
Consists
of more conventional types of
problems involving vocabulary
definition, and
comprehension
of various concepts.
·
The
subscales include:
·
Information
·
Comprehension
·
Arithmetic
·
Similarities
Performance
Scale
·
It
involves assembling small
objects and arranging
pictures in a logical
order.
·
The
subscales include:
·
Digit
symbol
·
Picture
completion
·
Object
assembly
Administration
of WAIS and WISC
·
Individual
administration.
·
Time
consuming.
Group
Intelligence Tests
·
Considering
the time consuming nature of
the administration of Stanford-Binet
test, WAIS-R,
and
WISC-III, psychologists have
developed a number of group
intelligence tests.
Cultural
Biases and Intelligence Tests
·
Tests
used to assess people's intelligence
have been frequently
criticized for being
biased
against
particular groups of
people.
·
Culture-fair
IQ tests are developed and
used for overcoming this
problem. These tests do
not
discriminate
against any minority or
cultural group.
Alternative
Formulations
·
Psychologists
may also use other tools
for assessing the ability
and capacity of a person.
They
believe
in measuring other aspects of a
person's ability, besides just
relying upon the I.Q. of
a
person.
These aspects
include:
·
Moral
intelligence
·
Social
intelligence
·
Emotional
intelligence
Moral
Intelligence
·
Given
by Coles (1997) and Hass
(1998)
·
It
is the ability to differentiate
between right and
wrong
·
More
comprehensively, it is the capacity of
making right decisions that
are not only
beneficial
for
one self but to others as
well
202
Introduction
to Psychology PSY101
VU
Social
Intelligence
·
Also
known as SQ.
·
It
is the ability to understand
and deal with people;
salesmen, politicians, teachers,
clinicians,
and
religious leaders exhibit
this type of
intelligence
·
It
is also the ability to
understand and deal one's
own self by identifying
one's thoughts,
feeling,
attitudes and
behaviors
·
The
approach has been given
and supported by Hough,
2001, Riggio, Murphy, &
Pirozzolo
(2002).
Emotional
intelligence or EI (indicated by
EQ)
·
It
is the type of social
intelligence which is the
ability to cope with one's
own and other's
emotions;
to differentiate between them
and use information for
guiding one's thoughts
and
actions.
·
Indicated
by the EQ of a person. It includes
these aspects:
·
Self-awareness
·
Managing emotions
·
Empathy
·
Handling relationships.
203
Table of Contents:
|
|||||