|
|||||
Gender
Issues In Psychology (PSY -
512)
VU
Lesson
23
GENDER
AND EMOTION
Emotions
are one of the basic ingredients of
human existence, and the
spice of life. Emotions are
an integral
component
of a persons' personality man or woman.
It is a common observation that men and
women show
different
emotional response patterns; the
way they express emotion is
also different. Stereotypically it
is
thought
that women are more
emotional than men. Also
their behaviors are guided by
their emotions; they
are
led
by their heart not head.
Men, on the other hand, are
thought to have control over
their emotions; they
can
postpone
their emotional reaction,
and thus act rationally.
But how much of these
commonly held beliefs are
true?
Few questions need to be
explored in this regard.
Do
men and women have
different types of
emotions?
Are
they born with different
emotional packages?
Does
the different genetic make up
have ay thing to do with
it?
Do
different proportions of hormones play a
part in gender differences in
emotions?
BUT
the most important questions
still need to be posed
i.e.:
Are
there any real gender
differences in emotion???
Do
males and females have a
different emotional make up,
inherently, or is it only the expression
of emotions
in
which they vary?
Research
has shown that males
and females both possess the
same repertoire of emotions; it is
their
upbringing,
societal attitudes towards gender
roles, gender stereotypically, and
observational learning that leads
to
different expressions of emotion.
Off course biological
variables do have a role to
play; there is no denying
the
fact that hormonal imbalances,
physiological conditions trigger different
emotional experiences. Hence
women
experiencing certain emotions more
than men do, and
vice versa. But talking of
average, normal,
emotional
experience, other variables being
constant, the gender differences in
emotions may be attributable
more
too psycho-social cultural factors,
rather than biological
influences.
The
components of Emotions
Psychologists
have posed a number of theories
proposing various components of
emotion. In the earliest of
modern
day explanations of emotion,
their instinctual nature thus the
physiological component, ea emphasized
(Mc
Dougall, 1923). Although
psychologists agreed upon the
physiological aspect of emotions, the
later
theories
proposed the significance of the
cognitive aspect of the emotional
experience. Most theorists
agreed
upon
the combined action of physiological/ physical
arousal and cognitive
experience in an emotional
response.
The issue for debate
was thus the question as to whether the
physical arousal was of
prime
importance
or the cognitive labeling of experience.
Today, most psychologists
believe in the significance of the
cognitive
element, without denying the importance of the
physiological accompaniments; off course
many
other
psychologists do propose the edge of
biological experience over the
cognitive experience (Zajonc,
1984).
Psychologists
like Lazarus believe in the
primacy of cognitions.
Schachter
and Singer (1962) in their
investigation had shown that
both physiological arousal and
cognitive
labeling
were significant components of emotional
experience. Their experiment yielded that
subjects could
experience
different emotions, even when
similar levels of physical
arousal were present; the
experienced
emotion
depended upon the setting in
which the emotion was
experienced as well as the expectations
of the
participants.
Before
moving forward to investigate
and understand gender
differences in emotion, one
needs to comprehend
the
essence of the physiology cognition
debate. If you were of a physiological
opinion, then you will
believe in
the
physiological changes in emotion that
are the same no matter what the
nature of emotion is. If
someone
sticks
to the significance of cognition alone
then the belief will be that
emotional experience is caused by
the
cognitive
experience alone, the physiological
element being constant.
In
order to identify their
emotional experiences, men
tend to use physical curs;
women depend more on
cognitive
information (Pennebaker, & Roberts,
1992). Men's sensitivity to physical
cues is supported by the fact
that
men notice and assess their
internal physical states better
than women; these states
include blood pressure,
heart
rate, and blood glucose.
But one must not
take this to be the decisive evidence
supporting men's edge
over
women in terms of the ability to
gauge alterations in physiological
states. Research has shown
that in
67
Gender
Issues In Psychology (PSY -
512)
VU
naturalistic
settings, men and women
are equally good at
identifying changes in their
own bodily states.
Whereas
women have in edge over
men, in naturalistic settings, in terms
of gauging the emotional responses
of
others.
Women are capable, better
than men, in identifying others'
emotional experiences on the basis of
using
situational
and contextual cues. Thus
women have the ability, or sensitivity,
to sense their own physical
states,
as
well as others
emotions.
As
said earlier, men and women
are endowed with similar
emotions, but their
expression, and the
interpretation
of
the situation may be different.
The socialization process
has an important role to play in this
regard. From
very
early childhood, boys are
taught to control or restrain expression
of certain emotions (e.g., grief),
and
allowed
to express certain others
(e.g., aggression). Same is the
case with girls, but the
emotions that they are
taught
to control, and allowed to express
are different; they are
discouraged form indulging
into aggression,
especially
physical, and usually not
discouraged from expressing
grief or sadness; hence we see
many women
crying
but hardly any
man.
Many
researchers have tried to
identify similarities in emotional
experiences of men and
women, rather than
differences.
Universal features of emotions have been
explored in such studies. Facial
expression, or facial
movements,
accompanying emotional experience
have been studied in
different cultures. Research
shows that
some
such movements are universal
and are characteristic of emotions
across cultures (Ekman, 1984;
Ekman,
Levenson,
and Friesen, 1983).
68
Table of Contents:
|
|||||