|
|||||
Forensic
Psychology (PSY -
513)
VU
Lesson
05
POLICE
PSYCHOLOGY
PSTR
(Post Shooting Traumatic
Response)
Along
with many other task
related, organization related and
personal stressors, PSTR is also of
great
importance,
it is just like Post-traumatic stress
disorder "that
is an anxiety disorder that's
triggered
by
your memories of a traumatic event -- an
event that directly affected
you or an event that
you
witnessed".
In
PSTR
a
policeman can experience a
collection of emotions and
psychological
response
patterns that may occur
after a police officer shoots a
person in the line of duty"
it
is
more
likely if the victim dies, like
shooting a bank robber while
he was about to shoot some
innocent
victim.
But remember not everyone
involved in a traumatic and shooting
event experiences post-
shooting
stress disorder.
Symptoms
of Post Shooting Traumatic
Response (PSTR)
According
to (Bartol & Bartol 2004 )
symptoms may include:
1.
Perceptual distortions of time, sight and
sound
2.
Enhanced Sense of danger
3.
Anger
4.
Sleep difficulties
5.
Isolation/ withdrawal
6.
Flashbacks
Officers
may be furious at the person
they shot, their department, their
colleagues, or society at general
for
putting them in a position of having to
shoot someone. Now the role of
psychologist is again
very
important
to help such officers.
Assessment is also automatically done
after any police officer
shoots a
person
in the line of duty. The
kind of psychological service provided
here is generally of a more
long-
term
and continuously-monitored nature. So,
some times they recommend employees
involved in
shooting
incidents frequently have to take a
leave of absence and/or get
assigned to "administrative
duties."
The
psychologist sometimes plays a
role in determining if such an
employee is ready to
re-
assume
their normal duties or not.
More and more police departments
are experimenting with
peer
group
counseling for shooting
(critical) incidents.
Fitness-for-Duty
Evaluation (FFDE)
Certain
kinds of psychological assessments
are done as a matter of standard procedure
with some
aspects
of police work. For example,
SWAT
team
members and officers (Special
Weapons and Tactics,
a
unit that is trained and
equipped to handle special, high-risk
incidents) working undercover,
narcotics,
vice,
or internal affairs are
frequently required to undergo
some sort of periodic
psychological
assessment
to ensure they are "fit" to
continue working in these
high-stress positions. Normally,
these
assessments
are done on a yearly basis
and an
FFDE can
usually be ordered by any
upper-rank
employee
on a lower-rank employee whenever the
lower-rank employee engages in
"suspicious"
behavior
which brings up serious questions
about whether they are
fit to carry out public
safety work or
not.
Procedure
of fitness for duty
evaluation
For
on-duty assessment role of
psychologist is very important,
critical and difficult as FFDE requires
a
much
more intensive assessment than the
pre-employment psychological screening
evaluation. Fitness
for
duty evaluations should be
used with care and while
working in the same department it is
really
difficult
to assess the co-workers especially
when you have to report that
person under assessment is
not
fit
for the duty.
The
full ramp up required by an FFDE
involves:
1.
Psychological screening report
2.
Personality tests, cognitive
and ability tests
3.
Performance evaluations
4.
Use of excessive force
incidents (how much torture
is exhibited?)
17
Forensic
Psychology (PSY -
513)
VU
5.
Formal
complaints
6.
Shootings
7.
Medical
records
8.
Frequent
mental status exams
9.
An
intensive background
investigation
10.
The
collection of testimonials by fellow
officers
11.
Follow-up
on citizen complaints
12.
Examination
of medical records
13.
Internal
affairs investigation
14.
Investigation
of brain injuries
FFDE
needs to be done with care
and sophistication so; IACP
(International Association of
Chiefs
of
Police) sets the following
criteria for
FFDE:
1.
One or more citizen complaints
regarding excessive force,
inappropriate verbal conduct, or
inability
to exercise self control and
self discipline.
2.
Abrupt and negative change in customary
behavior.
3.
Irrational verbal conduct or behaviors,
including delusions and
hallucinations.
4.
Suicidal statements or behaviors, or
personal expressions of mental
instability.
5.
Unexplained and excessive
tiredness or hyperactivity.
6.
Dramatic change in eating patterns,
sudden weight loss or gain,
diagnosis of life threatening
disorder.
7.
Change in attention to personal hygiene
and health.
8.
Inappropriate use of alcohol, medications
or other drugs, including symptoms of
illegal drug
use.
9.
Memory losses
10.
Impatience or impulsiveness, especially
with loss of temper.
11.
Inability to defuse tense
situations, or tendency to escalate
situations and create
confrontations.
12.
Unexplained and inappropriate
excessive lateness or
absenteeism.
13.
Any other factor or combinations of
factors that causes a supervisor to reasonably
suspect that a
fitness
for duty evaluation may be
necessary.
False
Confessions
"A
false
confession is where a
suspect in a crime admits guilt to the
crime, even though he or she is
not
responsible
for the crime." (Wikipedia)
Even
though false confessions might
appear to be an exceptional and unlikely
event, they occur on a
regular
basis in law systems and it
is one of the reasons that
law has established a series of rules
to
detect,
and subsequently reject, false
confessions. These are
called the "confession
rules".
Whenever a
sensational
crime occurs involving a
celebrity, public official or
well-known person in the public
eye,
hundreds
of people usually come
forward to confess to the crime.
Not all of these confessions
can be
true,
so most if not all of them
must be false. The false
confession phenomenon also
occurs with
unsolved
crimes. For example, over
two hundred people confessed
to the Lindbergh baby
(1932)
kidnapping,
and hundreds of people confessed to the
(1947) Black Dahlia murder
in Los Angeles.
Some
people continue to confess to
this day about these
crimes, and include people
who were not even
born
at the time. So, why do
these people confess to
crimes they didn't
commit?
Types
of false confessions
False
confession can occur for a variety of
reasons, ranging from the
suspect feeling "overpowered"
by
police
questioning to someone who is
"psychologically vulnerable" admitting to
something they didn't
do.
Kassin's (1997) typology is
probably the most-reproduced list of false confession
types, and appears
below:
1.
Voluntary
2.
Coerced
18
Forensic
Psychology (PSY -
513)
VU
1.
Voluntary confessions
Attention
seeking & Publicity
conscious
Few
people falsely confess just
to seek fame or recognition or impress
others usually come forward
in
celebrity
cases or seekers of attention
commit this abnormal
behavior.
2.
Protection of others
These
types of confessions are very common in
our culture and people
falsely confess to protect
their
valuable
dear ones e.g. one younger
brother falsely confessed to
save his elder brother as
elder brother
was
the only one who was earning
and supporting the whole
family.
Coerced
false confessions
Coerced
false confessions are results of
compelling a person to involuntarily
behave in a certain way
(whether
through action or inaction) by
use of threats, intimidation or
some other form of pressure
or
force.
Coercion may typically
involve the actual infliction of physical
or psychological harm in order to
enhance
the credibility of a threat. The
threat of further harm may
then lead to the cooperation
or
obedience
of the person being coerced
(Wikipedia).So, coerced confessions
are initiated by
police
because
of several reasons like Police
need to solve the crime
because of higher authorities'
pressure to
solve
the case or/and police
officer wants to show the success
for promotions.
Coerced-compliant
false confessions
People
confess to just get the police
interrogation over with or
confess to avoid being
prosecuted for a
crime
elsewhere with stiffer
penalties.
Coerced-internalized
false confessions
This
type of people come forward
and really believe they did
the crime because of their
guilt out of
interrogation
or persuasion and commonly innocent,
tired and confused people are
highly
psychologically
vulnerable to these types of confessions.
if two persons are equally
exposed to same
type
of coercion one can
internalize false confession because of the factors
mentioned earlier.
Techniques
used for police
interrogation
Police
of various countries use different
typical techniques for interrogations
like:
·
Use of excessive
force
·
Threats
·
Sleep deprivation
·
Physical and psychological
torture
19
Table of Contents:
|
|||||