ZeePedia

Language and thought:Productivity & Regularity, Linguistic Intuition

<< Mental Imagery:Eidetic Imagery, Eidetic Psychotherapy, Hot and cold imagery
Cognitive development:Assimilation, Accommodation, Stage Theory >>
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Lesson 43
Language and thought
Another important field is Psycholinguistics that studies the importance of languages in
Psychology.
Language
Language is the most impressive of all cognition. The difference between human language and
the natural communication systems of other species is enormous. More than anything else,
language is responsible for the current advanced state of human civilization. It is principal means
by which knowledge is recorded and transmitted across generations. Language is far superior to
animal communication.
Languages also provide people with the principal means of assessing what another person
knows. So, without language human beings would experience countless more misunderstanding
than they currently do. If there were no language people will be bored by technology so, there will
be little technology without language. Therefore without language much of the joy of living would
be lost. Language is very important in every field i.e. Religion, Law and Morality.
Language is a primary source of cognitive psychology. Noam Chomsky made language his basic
subject matter and talked about the importance of language. He also criticized Behaviorists that
gave importance only to the overt behavior and ignored the importance of language.
Productivity & Regularity
Language is not a random combination of words. Balanced against the productivity of language is
its highly regular character. The psycholinguist focuses on two aspects of language: productivity
and regularity.
Productivity refers to the fact that an infinite number of utterances are possible in any language.
Regularity refers to the fact that these utterances are systematic in many ways.
A set of rules that accounts for both productivity and regularity of natural language is called
grammar.
What is Grammar?
A grammar should be able to prescribe or generate all the acceptable sentences of a language
and be able to reject all the unacceptable sentences in the language.
Some violations of grammar are given below;
1. These are rejecting syntactic violations
The girls hits the boys
The girl hit a boys
The boys were hit the girls
These are called syntactic violations. They are fairly meaningful but contain some mistakes in
word combinations or word forms. The correct sentences are
·
The girls hit the boys.
·
The girl hits a boy.
·
The boys hot the girls.
2. Reject semantic violations
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously
Sincerity frightened the cat
129
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
These are correct syntactically but wrong semantically. In these sentences words are correct in
form and syntactic but their combination is nonsense.
3. Reject phonological violations
Vere is the wase?
We produce V and W same phonologically. These are mistakes V and W have different sounds.
This sentence is correct syntactically and semantically but be mispronounced. The correct
sentence is where is vase?
To account for the regularity of language, linguists need a grammar. The grammar includes
Phonology, Syntax, and Semantics. Phonology means sound, syntax means structure, and
semantics means meaning.
Linguistic Intuition
Another feature that linguists want a grammar to explain is the linguistic intuitions of speakers of
the language. Linguistic intuitions are judgments about the nature of linguistic utterances or about
the relationship between linguistic utterances.
Some examples of linguistic intuition are given in Urdu.
For example,
Larki nay Larkay ko maara
Larkay nay larki say maar khai
Above two sentences are paraphrases Ambiguity: Ambiguity means one word has more
meanings that are confusing. For example, they are cooking apples. This sentence has many
meanings. Some can think it as cooking as food some can think cooking means making salad
etc.
Grammar can specify well-formed sentences, ill-formed ones and why. Explain intuitions that
have about such things as paraphrase and ambiguity.
Competence versus performance
Linguistic competence means a person's abstract knowledge of the language. And linguistic
performance means the actual application of that knowledge in speaking or listening. In Chomsky
views the linguist's task is to develop a theory of competence and the psychologist task is to
develop a theory of performance.
Our everyday use of language does not always correspond to the prepositions of linguistic theory.
We misunderstand the meaning of sentences. We hear sentences that are ambiguous but do not
note their ambiguity. Another complication is that linguistic intuitions are not always clear.
For example, a child talks to his mother and says
Child:
Look Mum fis
Mother:
Fis?
Child:
No, fis.
Mother:
Oh, fish.
Child:
Yes, fis.
This is the fis phenomenon the child knows but can't perform.
Syntactic Formalisms
A great deal of emphasis in linguistics has been given to understanding the syntax of natural
language. One central linguistic concept is phrase structure.
130
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Phrase Structure
Phase structure analysis is not only significant in linguistics, but is also very important to an
understanding of language processing.
In the above figure the structure of phrase is given as an upside-down tree. In this phase
structure tree sentence (s) points to its subunits nouns phrase (NP) and verb phrase (VP), and
each of these units points to its subunits.
Chomsky
Noam Chomsky worked a lot on language. He made some rules of grammar. He says every
sentence has two structures.
Deep Structure
Surface Structure
Then there is Transformational grammar that helps in making sentence.
Deep: The boy reads the book
Surface: The boy +future tense+ read the book. After the transformation the sentence become
"The boy will read the book".
The figure, in below, is showing the Chomsky concept of deep structure and surface structure.
How the sentence start with the base component then deep structure then transformational
component and semantic component after these components there is surface structure and in the
last there is phonological structure.
131
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Language and Thought
Next question is that what affect the structure of language has on cognition. Language is a source
of thinking. A wide variety of proposals have been put forth as to the connection between
language and thought.
There are many evidences showed the relationship between language and thought; Aristotle
argued that thought determined language 2500 years ago.
Whorf argued in the 20th century Language determines thought. He claimed that language
determines or strongly influences the way a person thinks or perceives the world. This proposal
claims that language and thought are identical. Arabic has a large number of words for Camel.
Eskimos have a large number of words for snow. Their language has any effect on the Eskimos'
perception of snow over and above the effect of experience. The difference between ice and
snow is also clearly understood by Eskimos than any other person.
Chomsky took a modularity position in this debate of language and thoughts. He said language
and thoughts are separate systems that have different process.
One experiment was compared the ability of Dani (people of Indonesia) to learn nonsense names
of focal (basic) colors versus nonfocal colors. English speakers find it easier to learn arbitrary
names for focal colors. Dani subjects also found it easier to learn arbitrary focal colors than
nonfocal colors even they have no names for these colors in their culture.
Natural order
In different languages the sentence order is in these forms
S= subject
O= object
V= verb
SOV
44 percent of worlds language
SVO
35 percent of worlds language
VSO
19 percent of worlds language
VOS
2 percent of worlds language
132
Table of Contents:
  1. INTRODUCTION:Historical Background
  2. THE INFORMATION PROCESSING APPROACH
  3. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY:Brains of Dead People, The Neuron
  4. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (CONTINUED):The Eye, The visual pathway
  5. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (CONTINUED):Hubel & Wiesel, Sensory Memory
  6. VISUAL SENSORY MEMORY EXPERIMENTS (CONTINUED):Psychological Time
  7. ATTENTION:Single-mindedness, In Shadowing Paradigm, Attention and meaning
  8. ATTENTION (continued):Implications, Treisman’s Model, Norman’s Model
  9. ATTENTION (continued):Capacity Models, Arousal, Multimode Theory
  10. ATTENTION:Subsidiary Task, Capacity Theory, Reaction Time & Accuracy, Implications
  11. RECAP OF LAST LESSONS:AUTOMATICITY, Automatic Processing
  12. AUTOMATICITY (continued):Experiment, Implications, Task interference
  13. AUTOMATICITY (continued):Predicting flight performance, Thought suppression
  14. PATTERN RECOGNITION:Template Matching Models, Human flexibility
  15. PATTERN RECOGNITION:Implications, Phonemes, Voicing, Place of articulation
  16. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Adaptation paradigm
  17. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Gestalt Theory of Perception
  18. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Queen Elizabeth’s vase, Palmer (1977)
  19. OBJECT PERCEPTION (continued):Segmentation, Recognition of object
  20. ATTENTION & PATTERN RECOGNITION:Word Superiority Effect
  21. PATTERN RECOGNITION (CONTINUED):Neural Networks, Patterns of connections
  22. PATTERN RECOGNITION (CONTINUED):Effects of Sentence Context
  23. MEMORY:Short Term Working Memory, Atkinson & Shiffrin Model
  24. MEMORY:Rate of forgetting, Size of memory set
  25. Memory:Activation in a network, Magic number 7, Chunking
  26. Memory:Chunking, Individual differences in chunking
  27. MEMORY:THE NATURE OF FORGETTING, Release from PI, Central Executive
  28. Memory:Atkinson & Shiffrin Model, Long Term Memory, Different kinds of LTM
  29. Memory:Spread of Activation, Associative Priming, Implications, More Priming
  30. Memory:Interference, The Critical Assumption, Limited capacity
  31. Memory:Interference, Historical Memories, Recall versus Recognition
  32. Memory:Are forgotten memories lost forever?
  33. Memory:Recognition of lost memories, Representation of knowledge
  34. Memory:Benefits of Categorization, Levels of Categories
  35. Memory:Prototype, Rosch and Colleagues, Experiments of Stephen Read
  36. Memory:Schema Theory, A European Solution, Generalization hierarchies
  37. Memory:Superset Schemas, Part hierarchy, Slots Have More Schemas
  38. MEMORY:Representation of knowledge (continued), Memory for stories
  39. Memory:Representation of knowledge, PQ4R Method, Elaboration
  40. Memory:Study Methods, Analyze Story Structure, Use Multiple Modalities
  41. Memory:Mental Imagery, More evidence, Kosslyn yet again, Image Comparison
  42. Mental Imagery:Eidetic Imagery, Eidetic Psychotherapy, Hot and cold imagery
  43. Language and thought:Productivity & Regularity, Linguistic Intuition
  44. Cognitive development:Assimilation, Accommodation, Stage Theory
  45. Cognitive Development:Gender Identity, Learning Mathematics, Sensory Memory