|
|||||
Clinical
Psychology (PSY401)
VU
LESSON
31
CLIENT
CENTERED THERAPY
Person-centered
therapy, which is also known
as client-centered, non-directive, or Rogerian
therapy, is an
approach
to counseling and psychotherapy
that
places much of the
responsibility for the
treatment process
on
the client, with the
therapist taking a nondirective
role.
PURPOSE:
Two
primary goals of person-centered therapy
are increased self-esteem
and greater openness
to
experience.
Some of the related changes that this
form of therapy seeks to foster in
clients include closer
agreement
between the client's idealized and
actual selves; better self-understanding;
lower levels of
defensiveness,
guilt, and insecurity; more
positive and comfortable relationships
with others; and an
increased
capacity to experience and express
feelings at the moment they
occur.
BACKGROUND:
Developed
in the 1930s by the American
psychologist
Carl Rogers, client-centered therapy
departed from
the
typically formal, detached
role of the therapist
emphasized in psychoanalysis
and
other forms of
treatment.
Rogers believed that therapy should take
place in a supportive environment created
by a close
personal
relationship between client
and therapist. Rogers's
introduction of the term
"client" rather than
"patient"
expresses his rejection of
the traditionally hierarchical
relationship between therapist
and client
and
his view of them as equals. In
person-centered therapy, the client
determines the general
direction of
therapy,
while the therapist seeks to
increase the client's insight
and self-understanding through
informal
clarifying
questions.
Beginning
in the 1960s, person-centered therapy
became associated with the
human potential
movement.
This
movement, dating back to the
beginning of the 1900s, reflected an
altered perspective of human
nature.
Previous
psychological theories viewed human
beings as inherently selfish and corrupt.
For example,
Freud's
theory focused on sexual and
aggressive tendencies as the
primary forces driving human
behavior.
The
human potential movement, by
contrast, defined human
nature as inherently good. From
its
perspective,
human behavior is motivated by a
drive to achieve one's
fullest potential.
Self-actualization,
a
term derived from the
human potential movement, is an
important concept
underlying
person-centered
therapy. It refers to the
tendency of all human beings
to move forward, grow, and
reach
their
fullest potential. When humans move
toward self-actualization, they are
also pro-social; that is,
they
tend
to be concerned for others
and behave in honest,
dependable, and constructive ways.
The concept of
self-actualization
focuses on human strengths
rather than human deficiencies. According
to Rogers, self-
actualization
can be blocked by an unhealthy
self-concept (negative or unrealistic attitudes about
oneself).
Rogers
adopted terms such as
"person-centered approach" and "way of
being" and began to focus
on
personal
growth and self-actualization. He also
pioneered the use of
encounter groups, adapting
the
sensitivity
training (T-group) methods developed by
Kurt Lewin (1890-1947) and
other researchers at the
National
Training Laboratories in the
1950s.
While
person-centered therapy is considered one
of the major therapeutic approaches,
along with
psychoanalytic
and cognitive-behavioral
therapy, Rogers's
influence is felt in schools of therapy
other
than
his own. The concepts and
methods he developed are used in an
eclectic fashion by many different
types
of counselors and
therapists.
PROCESS:
Rogers
believed that the most
important factor in successful therapy
was not the therapist's
skill or training,
but
rather his or her attitude.
Three interrelated attitudes on the part
of the therapist are central to
the success
of
person-centered therapy: congruence;
unconditional positive regard;
and empathy.
Congruence
refers
to the therapist's openness
and genuineness--the willingness to
relate to clients without
hiding
behind a professional facade. Therapists
who function in this way
have all their feelings
available to
them
in therapy sessions and may share
significant emotional reactions
with their clients. Congruence
does
not
mean,
however, that therapists disclose
their own personal problems
to clients in therapy sessions or
shift
the focus of therapy to themselves in
any other way.
230
Clinical
Psychology (PSY401)
VU
Unconditional
positive regard means
that the therapist accepts
the client totally for
who he or she is
without
evaluating or censoring, and
without disapproving of particular
feelings, actions, or
characteristics.
The
therapist communicates this attitude to
the client by a willingness to
listen without
interrupting,
judging,
or giving advice. This attitude of
positive regard creates a
non threatening context in which
the
client
feels free to explore and
share painful, hostile, defensive, or abnormal
feelings without worrying
about
personal rejection by the
therapist.
The
third necessary component of a
therapist's attitude is
empathy
("accurate
empathetic understanding").
The
therapist tries to appreciate
the client's situation from
the client's point of view, showing an
emotional
understanding
of and sensitivity to the client's
feelings throughout the therapy session.
In other systems of
therapy,
empathy with the client
would be considered a preliminary
step to enabling the therapeutic
work to
proceed;
but in person-centered therapy, it
actually constitutes a major
portion of the therapeutic work
itself.
A
primary way of conveying this empathy is
by active listening that shows careful
and perceptive attention
to
what the client is saying. In
addition to standard techniques,
such as eye contact, that
are common to any
good
listener, person-centered therapists
employ a special method called
reflection,
which
consists of
paraphrasing
and/or summarizing what a client
has just said. This
technique shows that the
therapist is
listening
carefully and accurately, and gives
clients an added opportunity to examine
their own thoughts
and
feelings
as they hear them repeated
by another person. Generally, clients
respond by elaborating further
on
the
thoughts they have just
expressed.
According
to Rogers, when these three
attitudes (congruence, unconditional
positive regard, and
empathy)
are
conveyed by a therapist, clients can
freely express themselves
without having to worry about
what the
therapist
thinks of them. The
therapist does not attempt
to change the client's thinking in
any way. Even
negative
expressions are validated as
legitimate experiences. Because of this
nondirective approach, clients
can
explore the issues that are
most important to them--not
those considered important by
the therapist.
Based
on the principle of self-actualization, this
undirected, uncensored self-exploration
allows clients to
eventually
recognize alternative ways of
thinking that will promote personal
growth. The therapist
merely
facilitates
self-actualization by providing a climate in which
clients can freely engage in
focused, in-depth
self-exploration.
APPLICATION:
Rogers
originally developed person-centered therapy in a
children's clinic while he was
working there;
however,
person-centered therapy was not intended
for a specific age group or subpopulation
but has been
used
to treat a broad range of people. Rogers
worked extensively with people
with schizophrenia
later
in
his
career. His therapy has also
been applied to persons
suffering from depression,
anxiety, alcohol
disorders,
cognitive dysfunction, and
personality
disorders. Some
therapists argue that
person-centered
therapy
is not effective with
non-verbal or poorly educated
individuals; others maintain that it
can be
successfully
adapted to any type of
person. The person-centered
approach can be used in
individual, group,
or
family
therapy.
With young children, it is
frequently employed as play
therapy.
There
are no strict guidelines regarding the
length or frequency of person-centered
therapy. Generally,
therapists
adhere to a one-hour session once
per week. True to the spirit
of person-centered therapy,
however,
scheduling may be adjusted according to
the client's expressed needs.
The client also
decides
when
to terminate therapy. Termination usually
occurs when he or she feels able to
better cope with
life's
difficulties.
POSITIVE
RESULTS:
The
expected results of person-centered
therapy include improved self-esteem;
trust in one's inner
feelings
and
experiences as valuable sources of
information for making
decisions; increased ability to learn
from
(rather
than repeating) mistakes; decreased
defensiveness, guilt, and
insecurity; more positive
and
comfortable
relationships with others; an increased
capacity to experience and express
feelings at the
moment
they occur; and openness to
new experiences and new ways of
thinking about life.
Outcome
studies of humanistic therapies in
general and person-centered therapy in
particular indicate that
people
who have been treated
with these approaches
maintain stable changes over
extended periods of
time;
that
they change substantially compared to
untreated persons; and that
the changes are roughly
comparable
to
the changes in clients who
have been treated by other
types of therapy. Humanistic
therapies appear to be
particularly
effective in clients with depression or
relationship issues. Person-centered
therapy, however,
231
Clinical
Psychology (PSY401)
VU
appears
to be slightly less effective than other
forms of humanistic therapy in which
therapists offer more
advice
to clients and suggest topics to
explore.
Limitations:
If
therapy has been unsuccessful,
the client will not move in
the direction of self-growth
and self-
acceptance.
Instead, he or she may continue to
display behaviors that reflect self-defeating
attitudes or rigid
patterns
of thinking.
Several
factors may affect the success of
person-centered therapy. If an individual
is not interested in
therapy
(for example, if he or she was forced to
attend therapy), that person may not
work well together
with
the therapist. The skill of
the therapist may be another
factor. In general, clients tend to
overlook
occasional
therapist failures if a satisfactory
relationship has been
established. A therapist who
continually
fails
to demonstrate unconditional positive
regard, congruence, or empathy cannot
effectively use this
type
of
therapy. A third factor is the client's
comfort level with
nondirective therapy. Some
studies have
suggested
that certain clients may get bored, frustrated, or annoyed
with a Rogerian style of therapeutic
interaction.
THE
HUMANISTIC EXISTENTIAL
MOVEMENT:
The
strands of phenomenology, humanism,
and existentialism in psychology are
inextricably woven
together.
We know the importance that Rogers
attached_ to
immediate experience. This is
basic
phenomenology.
At the same time,
client-centered approaches stress
the worth, uniqueness, and
dignity of
the
client. This is basic
humanism. Before we proceed to
discuss existential therapies,
logotherapy, and
Gestalt
therapy, let us pause to acknowledge
the humanistic tradition that pervades
those therapies.
HUMANISM:
Although
humanistic psychology is a fairly recent
development, its origins extend far back
into philosophy
and
the history of psychology.
When one speaks of humanism,
one thinks of psychologists
such as Allport,
Goldstein,
James, Murray, and Rogers.
The values that humanism
contributes to psychology are
not rooted
in
the determinism of either psychoanalysis or
behaviorism. From a humanist perspective, people
are not
products
of the past, the
unconscious, or the environment. Rather,
they exercise free choice in
the pursuit of
their
inner potential and self actualization.
They are not fragmented
patchworks of cognitions, feelings,
and
aspirations;
rather, they are unified,
whole, and unique beings. To
understand is to appreciate
those
qualities,
and this understanding- can only be
achieved by an awareness of the
person's experience.
So-
called
scientific constructs based on
norms, experiments, or data
must give way to intuition
and empathy.
The
emphasis is not on sickness, deviations,
or diagnostic labels, but on positive
striving, self-actualization
freedom
and naturalness. In one form
or another humanism is expressed as a
resistance to the
positivistic
determinism
of science and as an active embrace of
the essential humanity of
people.
EXISTENTIAL
THERAPY:
Existential
psychology rejects the mechanistic
views of the Freudians and
instead sees people as engaged
in
a
search for meaning. At a
time when so many people are troubled by
the massive problems of
a
technological
society and seek to repair
their alienated modes of living,
existentialism has gained great
popularity.
It seems to promise the restoration of meaning to
life, an increased spiritual awakening,
and
individual
growth that will bring freedom
from the conventional shackles
created by a conformist society.
Hardly
a unified movement that speaks
with a single voice, the
existential view actually
turns out to be
many
views. When we discuss the psychological
applications of existentialism, such names as
Binswanger,
Boss,
Gendlin, Frankl, May, and
Laing come to mind.
Philosophically, existentialism springs
from the same
sources
as does phenomenology.
The
existentialists make a number of
assertions about human nature.
Basic to all is a fundamental
human
characteristic:
the search for meaning).That
search is carried out
through imagination, symbolization,
and
judgment.
All of this occurs in a matrix of
participation in society. From the
standpoint
of
their physical,
environment
and their biological environment, people
function in a social context.
232
Clinical
Psychology (PSY401)
VU
A
crucial facet of personality is decision
making, which involves the
world of both facts and
possibilities.
Thus,
personality is not just what one is a
biological, social, and psychological
being but also what
one
might
become.
Many
existentialists believe that decision making
involves a set of inevitable
choices. One can choose
the
present
(the status quo), which represents
lack of change and a commitment to
the past. That
choice_ will
lead
to guilt and remorse over
missed opportunities. But one
can also choose alliance
with the future.
That
choice propels the person
into the future with an
anxiety that stems from
one's inability to predict
and
control
the unknown. Such
experiences of guilt and
anxiety are not learned,
but are part of the essence
of
living.
It requires courage to choose
the future and suffer the
inevitable anxieties that this -choice
entails. A
person
can find that courage by
having faith in self and by recognizing
that choosing the past will
inevitably
lead
to a guilt that is even more
terrifying than
anxiety.
THE
GOALS OF THERAPY:
The
ultimate goal of existential
psychotherapy is to help the
individual reach a point at
which awareness
and
decision making can be exercised
responsibly. The exercise of cognitive
abilities will allow for
the
achievement
of higher states of love,
intimacy, and constructive social
behavior. Through therapy,
one must
learn
to accept responsibility for
one's own decisions and to
tolerate the anxiety that accumulates as
one
moves
toward change. This involves
self-trust and also a capacity to accept
those things in life that are
un-
changeable
or inevitable.
Techniques:
Existential
therapy does not emphasize
techniques. Too often,
techniques imply that the
client is an object
to
which those techniques are
applied. Instead, the
emphasis is on understanding and on
experiencing the
client
as a unique essence. Therapy is an
encounter that should enable the
client to come closer
to
experience.
By
experiencing self, the client can learn
to attach meaning and value to
life. Sometimes the
therapist will
confront
the client with questions,
questions that force the client to
examine the reasons for
failure to search
for
meaning in life. For example, a
client who repeatedly complains that
his job is not very
fulfilling may be
asked
why
he
does not search for other
employment or return to school for more
training.
Such
questions may force the client to examine
his orientation toward the
past more closely, and this,
in
turn,
creates feelings of guilt and a
sense of emptiness. Gendlin
(1969, 1981) discusses focusing as a
means
of
reaching the pre-conceptual,
felt sense. This is achieved
by having clients focus on the concretely
felt
bodily
sense of what is troubling
them. Silences are
encouraged to help accomplish this.
However, very few
research
studies have been published that evaluate
the effectiveness of focusing in treating clients;
its
efficacy,
therefore, remains to be established
(Greenberg et al.,
(994)
Logo
therapy:
One
of the most widely known
forms of existential therapy is
logotherapy. This technique encourages
the
client
to find meaning in what appears to be a
callous, uncaring, and meaningless
world. Viktor Frankl
developed
the technique. His early
ideas were shaped by the
Freudian influence. However, he moved on
an
existential
framework as he tried to find
ways of dealing with
experiences in Nazi concentration camps.
He
lost
his mother, father, brother,
and wife to the Nazi
Holocaust and was himself
driven to the bunk of
death
(Frankl,
1963).
It
seemed to him that the
persons who could not
survive these camps were
those who possessed only
the
conventional
meanings of life to sustain
them. But such conventional
meanings could not come to
grips with
the
realities of the Nazi atrocities. Therefore,
what was required was a
personal meaning for
existence.
From
his wartime experiences and
the existential insights that he felt
permitted him to survive,
Frankl
developed
logotherapy (the therapy of meaning) Frankl's views
about personality and his ideas about
the
goals
of therapy are generally quite
consonant with our previous
discussion of existentialism. However, it
is
not
always clear that logotherapy techniques
bear any close or rational
relationship to the
theory.
Logotherapy
is designed not to replace
but to complement more
traditional psychotherapy. However,
when
the
essence of a particular emotional
problem seems to involve
agonizing over the meaning
or the futility of
life,
Frankl regards logotherapy as
the specific therapy of choice.
Logotherapy_ then strives to inculcate
a
sense
of the client's own responsibility
and obligations to life
(once the latter's meaning
has been unfolded).
233
Clinical
Psychology (PSY401)
VU
Frankl
makes much of responsibility, regarding
it as more important than historical
events in the client's
life.
What is crucial is the meaning of the
present and the outlook
for the future.
In
particular, two techniques
described by Frankl (1960)
have gained considerable exposure.
Paradoxical
intention
is a
popular technique in which the
client is told to consciously
attempt to perform the
very
behavior
or response that is the object of anxiety
and concern. Fear is thus
replaced by a paradoxical wish.
For
example, suppose that a client complains
that she is fearful of blushing when
she speaks before a group.
She
would be instructed to try to blush on
such occasions. According to
Frankl, the paradoxical fact is
that
she
will usually be unable to blush when she
tries to do what she fears
she will do. Typically, the
therapist
tries
to handle all of this in a light tone.
For example, in the case of a
client fearful of trembling before
his
instructor,
Frankl (1965) instructs he
client to say to himself:
"Oh, here is the instructor!
Now I'll show
him
what
a good trembler I am-I'll really
show him how nicely I
can tremble".
The
second technique,
de-reflection,
instructs
the client to ignore a
troublesome behavior or
symptom.
Many
clients are exquisitely attuned to
their own responses and
bodily reactions. Dereflection
attempts to
divert
the client's attention to more
constructive activities and
reflections.
Gestalt
Therapy
In
Gestalt therapy the emphasis is on
present experience and on
the immediate awareness of emotion
and
action.
`'Being in touch" with one's
feeling replaces the search
for the origins of behavior.
Existential
problems
expressed by a failure to find meaning in
life have arisen in a
technological society that
separates
people
from themselves. Gestalt therapy promises
to restore the proper
balance.
CONCLUDING
COMMENTS:
These
approaches of treatment including
Client centerd, Existential
and Humanistic have made
several
noteworthy
contributions to the field of
psychotherapy. Clients' internal experience, feelings,
free will, and
growth
potential have been brought
to the forefront. Demonstrating the
importance of the therapeutic
relationship
and of rapport is another major
contribution.
However,
these forms of therapy also
present some problems. The
sometimes prejudicial language
used
implies
that other approaches are insensitive and
harmful. Feelings seem to be
overemphasized, and
behavior
underemphasized. Obscure and
jargon language is often
used, and there is a strong
bias against
empirical
research and formal
assessment. How these forms
of treatment will be modified, or if
they will
even
survive in their present
form, remains to be see. A
number of trends (such as
managed behavioral
health
care) pose threats to the
popularity and utility of
these forms of psychotherapy.
234
Table of Contents:
|
|||||