|
|||||
Abnormal
Psychology PSY404
VU
LESSON
10
RESEARCH
ETHICS
It
refers to norms, standard,
methods of conducting research. Why we should
observe these ethics?
Let
us go through some research
examples
1-Watson
and Rayner in 1920
In
this study an 11 month old
boy, Albert was introduced
to white rat and he was reported to
show no fear.
Just
as he reached out to touch the rat a
loud noise was created
which startled little Albert
and on repeated
trials,
Albert learned to fear white
furry objects.
2-Latane
and Darley (1976)
In
this study a child was asked
to guard the experimenter's pet hamster,
which was then removed
secretly
from
the cage through a hole in the
floor when the boy was not
looking. This was a source of
mental stress
for
the boy.
3-Researchers
and clinicians frequently
use experimental and control
groups in experiments where
the
experimental
group gets the treatment while the
control group gets placebo
(sugar coated pills).
This
placebo
looks like treatment but actually it is
deception.
4-After
World War II, the
Nazis forced the prisoners of war to go
through some painful
and
uncomfortable
"medical experiments."
5-Milgram's
Experiment on Obedience and
Conformity
The
debate on ethical principles in
psychological research began
with the classic experiment by Milgram
in
which
volunteers were introduced to a participant; this
participant was actually an experimental
confederate.
The
volunteers became the teacher and they
were asked to administer
electric shocks to the participant
for
each
mistake he made. The
electric shocks ranged from
15 volts to 450 volts which
was labeled as
danger:
severe
shock". A tape recording of screams and
refusals of the confederate also
deceived the volunteers.
The
volunteers were pressurized to continue the
experiment. The volunteer continued to
administer the
electric
shocks up to 450 volts.
This
study opened the debate that
the normal people are capable of behaving
like a sadistic and cruel or
evil
individual.
To
control these unethical practices in
research the British Psychological
Society (BPS) and the
American
Psychological
Association (APA) provides Ethical
Principles for Conducting Research
with Human
Participants
(1992). The principles guide
researcher the areas like risk,
consent, deception, debriefing,
and
withdrawal
from investigation, confidentiality,
protection of participants, observational
research, giving of
advice
to participants, and monitoring of
colleagues in profession.
·
Ethics
committees consists of groups of
psychologists or other professionals
who look over
each
proposed
research study and judge it
according to its safety and
consideration for the participants
in
the study.
·
Common
ethical guidelines:
1.
Rights and well-being of participants
must be weighed against the
study's value to
science.
2.
Participants must be allowed to make an
informed decision about
participation.
3.
Deception must be
justified.
4.
Participants may withdraw
from the study at any
time.
5.
Participants must be protected from
risks or told explicitly of
risks.
6.
Investigator must debrief
participants, telling the true
nature of the study and
expectations
of
results.
51
Abnormal
Psychology PSY404
VU
7.
Data must remain
confidential.
Scientists
and researchers raise many
ethical questions related to a
research project. Ethical issues
are
concerned
with federal and state
laws as well.
The
American Psychological Association (APA)
has formulated an ethics
code regarding conduction
of
research,
therapy, teaching and serving as
administrators.
Following
ethical standards are
spelled out before researchers begin a
psychological research.
Approval
for the research
project
1-Psychologists
plan and conduct a research
according to federal and
state law and regulations as
well
as
abiding by professional standards,
governing the conduct of research related
to human participants
and
animal subjects.
2-Psychologists
get permission and approval
from institutions and
organizations, they are part of
and
they
are conducting research for.
So, they seek permission
from their institutional
research boards
and
other higher research boards
governing them.
3-Psychologists
design to conduct research in a scientific
manner so that ethical
acceptability under
the
ethics code is provided
through institutional review boards,
animal care and use
societies or
committees,
peer consultations and other
proper mechanisms. Psychologists
take appropriate
protections
for the rights and welfare of
human participants and other
persons affected by
research.
Nearly
every college and university
has an independent committee or a board
which reviews every
research
project
involving humans or animals as
subjects, spells out the expenditure on
the research and the
benefit
it
will provide to the society.
Thus every individual, who
wants to do research, should inquire
from the
proper
authority, about the appropriate procedure
for institutional review.
Following
ethical issues are important
when we use humans as
subjects.
i.
Risk
Risk
is involved related with
physical, psychological or social
injury that may be caused to
subjects. So a
risk-
benefit ratio should be purposed
for each research project
which is just like
calculating a profit
loss
index
of the research project. Whether research participants
are at risk or not, is an important
question. Life
is
a risky affair. When we go to school,
cross a street, all activities
have an element of risk. To
say that
human
participants in psychological research
are at risk of physical, psychological
and social risk of
hurting
themselves.
So then it means that
assessing risk benefit ratio is
important. Risk is physical
harm or
possibility
of physical injury. The
researcher should protect participants
from physical injury, bodily
harm,
emotional
and mental stress arising
out of deception as well. Minimal risk
means that the possibility
and
magnitude
of harm or discomfort in the research
are not great or not
more than the one
encountered in the
daily
life during the performance of
routine physical or psychological
tests.
Example
1:
The
example discuss in the beginning of
eleven months old
Albert.
Example
2:
Milgram's
Study on obedience
ii.
Consent
Researchers
seek the willingness or consent of
their students, patient, clients
and other members of
the
community
who are taking part in a
scientific investigation. So informed consent of
participants is either
taken
verbally or in writing in form of a contract
that clearly spells out
each and every detail of
the
investigation.
In other words lying,
cheating or fraudulent behavior on
part of participant is violation of
the
consent
contract. Inform consent
means, that psychologist has
informed the participant about the nature
of
the
research, the methodology of the
research, the consequences or results of
declining to participate or to
withdraw
from the research at any
stage.
52
Abnormal
Psychology PSY404
VU
Example:
In
every research it is very essential
that the consent should be taken
from the participants.
iii.
Deception
Deception
means to hide, to withhold information or
misinformation to participants about an aspect of
a
research.
Psychologists use deceptive
techniques to study different phenomenon
but they never
deceive
their
research participants about significant aspects about
the research. They have to provide logic
and
rationale
why they are using
deception.
Example:
Milgram
in 1977, has suggested that
deception or masking or technical
illusion would be more
appropriate.
Example:
The
study carried on by Griffin
(1959) who made a systematic
observation of white people's
attitude
towards
negros. He painted himself black sat in a
bus and observed white
people's attitude towards
him,
this
practice continued for a
month. He wrote down all
these perceptions in his
book `Black like me'.
This
book
is a precursor of the civil rights movement in
USA.
iv.
Privacy
Privacy
refers to the rights of the individual to
decide, how information about
him is to be communicated
to
others i.e. whenever
possible, the information about
participants will be kept confidential.
Privacy is
keeping
a piece of information about
their client confidential.
Example:
The
information related to the fact that
even if a prime minister of a country is being
treated for a
psychological
disorder, this information is sacred and
it should be kept confidential.
v.
Debriefing
Debriefing
is an opportunity for participants to
know about a research. Debriefing is
necessary to remove
any
harmful effects or misconceptions
about participation as well as an
opportunity to explain to
participants
about the need for deception. So
debriefing educates the participants
about the research, it
rationale,
its method, its results and
why the real purpose of the experiment
was hidden from the
participant.
So debriefing is good for
both the participant and the
researcher.
Example:
Take
the example of a little boy
who was guarding the experimenter's pet
hamster.
Example
2:
Debriefing
was essential in case of
Milgram's study.
Example
3:
In
control group experiments, very
often placebos are used.
Which are fake medicines so
debriefing again is
essential?
vi
Non
Participation in research
The
investigator should give the participant full
information of the experiment, the level of
discomfort
involved.
The participant has the
right to withdraw at any
point of the experiment and they will
not be
punished
or his grade will not be
affected.
Vii
Power of the
investigator
The
practice of getting students, prisoners
and psychiatric patients as participants
for the stressful
experiments
where rewards such good
grades, pack of cigarettes
and release from hospital
routine activity
are
promised. If the student refuses to
participate, his grade may be
effected, or he will be asked to
study
another
extra credit course, prisoners privileges
will be withdrawn and
psychiatric patients will be
asked to
do
more to please the clinician.
Human
participants should be informed in 7
ways.
1.
What procedure will be used
in experiment?
2.
All potential risks should be
identified.
3.
Any benefits be identified.
53
Abnormal
Psychology PSY404
VU
4.
Participation
and performance should be kept
confidential.
5.
Compensation
in case of harm.
6.
Questions
related to experiments who
will answer.
7.
No
penalty if subjects refuse to participate or
leave it in the experiment in the middle.
Plagiarism
Psychologists
do not present portions or
elements of another persons work or
data as their own,
even
if the other person's work or
data source is missing so it
means that the publication credit be
given to
the
real author. Don't present
portion or elements of another person's
work as your own or avoid
giving
the
impression that another person's
work is yours. Ignorance is not a
legitimate excuse. If you do not
know
that
it's a crime even then there
is not excuse for
it.
Research
on animal subjects is justified by the
need to gain knowledge without
putting humans to
jeapody.
·
Animal
research answers questions we could
never do with human
research.
·
Focus
is on avoiding exposing them to unnecessary
pain or
suffering.
·
Animals
are used in approximately 7% of
psychological studies.
These
rabbits are part of a drug-testing study.
Their bodies are enclosed in
the metal cases to
prevent
movement
during the test. What steps
might the researchers be using to treat
the animals ethically?
Care
and use of animals as
subjects in research
1.
People who conduct research
with animals should treat animals
humanely.
2.
Appropriate consideration to be given to
comfort, health, and humane treatment of
laboratory animals
with
which research is
conducted.
3.
Researchers should make efforts to
minimize the discomfort and pain of
animal subjects. The cage
in
which
the animal is to be kept must be
clean, proper light,
temperature and fresh supply
of food and
water
be made available.
4.
A procedure subjecting animals to pain,
stress, discomfort is used
only when no other alternative
procedure
is available.
5.
Surgical procedures are
performed under appropriate
anesthesia.
6.
When it's necessary that
animal life be terminated it is to be done
rapidly with minimum pain
and in
accordance
with accepted
procedure.
54
Abnormal
Psychology PSY404
VU
Let
us learn about Ethics
of doing research in abnormal
psychology.
1-The
clinician's decision to delay
treatment, the people who need it is
frequently questioned. Treatment
is
also
with held when placebo
control group are used in
group experimental design.
2-Another
important question relates to inform
consent. Participants are
told that they may or they
may not
receive
a treatment. True inform consent is
rare, in other words, only
volunteers who are willing
to
participate
in a study, their inform consent is
seek.
The
concept of informed consent is derived
from World War II where
prisoners of war were forced
into
medical
experiments.
3-
APA wants that adults and
children both should be protected from
physical and psychological
harm.
Informed
consent of children of age 7
and older is taken from
their caregivers.
The
society for research in
child development 1990 has
endorsed guidelines for
research with children
be
provided
to their caregivers and
guardians.
The
APA ethical principles for conducting
research is an extremely comprehensive
document towards
overall
guidance towards respect for
people's rights and dignity,
concern for others welfare
and social
responsibility.
The
new millennium looks forward to
researchers to give up their unprofessional
and unethical attitude
towards
research.
55
Table of Contents:
|
|||||