|
|||||
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
Lesson
43
"CITIZENS'
MEDIA RIGHTS AND
RESPONSIBILITIES"
Note:
As students will have noted, the
verbal content of lecture no. 42 and the
PPTs provide the
conceptual
basis for, and the actual
text of 11 citizens' media rights
and 11 citizens' media
responsibilities.
For
the convenience of students, the relevant
text of these rights and responsibilities
with a preliminary note,
is
being reproduced as the first part of this
handout.
When
students have noted this new
concept of citizens' relationship with
media, the intention of lecture 43
is
to
also, hopefully, motivate
students to themselves, or encourage
members of their families, or friends,
or
colleagues,
now, or later in their lives, to
form new kinds of voluntary
civil organizations known as
"citizens'
media
associations".
Therefore,
to help them in this regard, the second
part of this handout reproduces the
chapter titled:
"creating
citizens media forums" from
the book titled: "Citizens'
media dialogue", written and
edited by
Javed
Jabbar, and cited previously in the
handout for lecture no.
42.
In
this second part of the handout, three
different options for
forming citizens' media forums
are described
in
ways that are possible to
follow and implement in the conditions of
Pakistan.
The
text of this chapter is also
available on the website whose content is
reproduced in the book:
"Citizens'
media
dialogue".
The
website is:
www.wiredet.com/cmd.
A
formulation first presented by
Javed Jabbar, at the Asian Media
Summit, organized by the Asia
Pacific
Institute
for Broadcasting Development,
with the support of UNESCO Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia, 18-21
April
2004
The
concept of universal human rights
has evolved steadily
throughout human history.
Prophets and
philosophers,
religions and political systems,
scholars, leaders and
citizens have contributed to the
process by
which
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
was eventually adopted on 10th December
1948 at the
United
Nations.
Contextual
rights that are specific to
categories of human beings
such as children or to sectoral
groups such
as
industrial workers have also
evolved, but are at varying levels of
evolution and
enforcement.
The
growth of mass media in the
20th century and the emergence of
new media in the 21st century
focus
attention
on the need to examine the context of
citizens' rights with regard to
conventional media as well
as
new
media. Media include: print, radio,
TV, cinema, cable TV
distribution systems, audio tapes,
video,
Internet,
CDs, DVDs, cell
phones/sms/and spin-offs.
Media
have assumed a position that
is unprecedented in human history. They
serve as valuable means for
the
articulation
on a mass scale of popular
aspirations and problems, of
entertainment and pleasure, of
advertising
and economic information, of
shared strengths as well as
weaknesses.
Media
appear to exert enormous power which, in the
name of freedom of expression, also
remains largely
unaccountable.
Principal media have their
respective codes of conduct and
there are also several
officials laws
and
rules that regulate these
media. But these parameters
do not reflect on a comprehensive basis
the need to
view
the role of media from the
most important perspective:
that of the citizen.
Compared
to corporate media and State
media, the single citizen,
and even groups of citizens'
are weak and
under-resourced.
At the same time, citizens also
have obligations to support and
strengthen media
independence.
121
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
Towards
articulating a framework for the empowerment of
citizens, and for rendering
their own duties to
media,
an attempt has been made to
identify 11 rights of citizens and 11
responsibilities of citizens in the
context
of media in general.
Comments
and proposals are invited
for improving upon the
formulation of these rights and
responsibilities.
The
aim is to enhance the people's
capacity to effectively address
their relationship with media
for the goal of
building
a just and equitable global
society.
(Citizens'
rights in the context of
media in general)
1)
All
citizens, indeed all human
beings including children, youth,
adults and senior citizens
should have
convenient
access to all media, such
access being subject to just
and fair law, and
universally
recognized
principles of human rights.
2)
Citizens
should be able to choose between
options within each medium
rather than be dependent on
only
one source or medium.
3)
Citizens
should be able to receive media
content which is reasonably
balanced between
news/analysis/programming
content and advertising content.
4)
Citizens
should have convenient access to
information about identities of persons
and organizations
in
regard to media ownership, management
control of media, sources of
funding of media and
on
other
financial aspects of media.
5)
Citizens
should have fair and convenient
access to independent and credible
mechanisms which
enable
media to be held accountable for
accuracy, fairness and
balance without such
monitoring and
accountability
mechanisms unduly restricting freedom of
expression of media.
6)
Citizens
have the right to access all
media at reasonable, and preferably
low cost.
7)
Citizens
have a right to be given appropriate time
and space in media directly or
indirectly without
charge
in case media content is
inaccurate, misleading or defamatory about a citizen
or the
community
to which a citizen belongs.
8)
Citizens
should have the right to own
and operate non-profit
public service media without
being
obliged
to pay auction based license
fees.
9)
When
citizens address letters or
complaints to media about aspects of
media content they should
receive
acknowledgements/replies from media, if
the letters/complaints are conveyed in
appropriate
language.
10)
Citizens
have the right to know how
the media content they are being
exposed to, is being
presented
in
other parts of the country, the region,
or the world, through other editions or
versions of the same
media.
11)
Citizens,
particularly youth and children, have the
right to be to imparted media literacy
and be
informed
on media issues as part of
their general
education.
(Citizens'
responsibilities in the context of
media in general)
1)
Citizens
should help to ensure that
all media function freely as
per the laws of the country in
which
the
media are based and
that media are allowed to similarly
function freely across regions,
and across
the
globe. Where laws are unjust
or unduly restrictive, citizens should
campaign to change
and
improve
media laws.
2)
Citizens
should actively support and demand
pluralism in media.
122
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
3)
Citizens
should also originate content and
contribute to media content, and
not remain passive
consumers
of media output.
4)
Citizens
should monitor media ownership and
cross media ownership to prevent
undue
concentration
of media power e.g. of State power or
corporate power.
5)
Citizens
should create and operate
civil society forums that
serve as independent bodies to
monitor
media
policies, practices and
content and to analyze media
issues from a public
interest perspective.
6)
Citizens
should fulfill their financial obligations to
media by observing copyright of media
content
and
by respecting intellectual property rights
and thereby, citizens should reject
purchase, or use of
pirated
materials.
7)
When
citizens use media or appear
in media, they should promote truth
and accuracy, rather
than
disinformation
and distortion.
8)
Citizens
should initiate and operate or
support citizens' media that
are exclusively focused on
the
public
interest and which help
balance the dominance of corporate media
and State-controlled
media.
9)
Citizens
should help protect media
and media practitioners from
physical violence or coercion.
10)
Citizens
should operate citizens'-controlled or citizens'-driven
media such as the internet,
cell
phones,
sms and other new media by
giving primacy to the values of
friendship and
fraternity
amongst
all people, to help build
peace, tolerance and
harmony.
11)
Citizens
should campaign for inclusion in school
and college curricula and in
other educational
materials,
of information on media issues to
prepare young people to effectively
address their
citizens'
media rights and
responsibilities.
In
December 1997 a small group
of concerned citizens met in
Islamabad and formed the
Citizens' Media
Commission
of Pakistan with the former
Chief Justice of Pakistan
Dr. Nasim Hasan Shah as
Chairman and
Mr.
Javed Jabbar former
Information Minister of Pakistan as
Convener. Its aims are
stated separately.
From
1998
to 2004, the Commission has
functioned as an informal body
which has nevertheless
functioned as an
advocacy
group and has focused on
observing 14th February of each
year as "electronic media freedom
day".
It
has also published 3 monographs on
aspects of media and has
monitored media
issues.
The
draft of these 11 citizens'
media rights and 11 citizens'
media responsibilities was prepared in
April 2004
without
prior reference to the text of the
"people's communication charter", a document that is
placed on the
website:
http://www.pccharter.net/charteren.html last
modified on 22nd December
1999.
While
this charter is a relevant point of
reference, the formulation of: "citizens'
media rights and
responsibilities"
has its own separate
specifically and validity.
For instance, the "people's
communication
charter"
makes no reference at all to
citizens' own obligations in regard to
media.
Now
in 2005 and onwards, to
disseminate the concept of citizens'
media rights and responsibilities at
the
grass
roots level, to encourage inputs to the draft of this
framework, and to build public
opinion in favour of
formalization
of these rights and responsibilities, it
is necessary to enlist the participation of
concerned
citizens,
of existing public interest and
civil society organizations
which are already working
with communities
across
the country and to form
local, community-based chapters of the
Citizens' Media Commission.
All
constructive
initiatives are encouraged
and welcomed. Comments from
overseas countries are also
invited.
For
further details, please
contact the founding convener of the
Commission at: javedjabbar@hotmail.com
or
javedjabbar2005@yahoo.com
or through
http://www.citizensmediapak.org
Creating
citizens' media forums:
Options
Formation
of Groups, Forums,
Associations
Formation
of groups, forums, associations, or
organizations representing viewers
and listeners in support of
pluralistic
and editorially independent electronic
media in the developing
countries.
123
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
There
are three options for the
formation of such
groups.
Option
A:
Forming
units within existing bodies who should
use this option?
This
option can be used where
active civil society
organizations already exist in
sectors such as human
and
consumer
rights, professional associations (of
architects, lawyers, engineers,
teachers, etc.) and where
they
already
possess a credible track record in
advocacy.
The
option:
New
units should be formed within the existing
bodies. These will focus
specifically on issues related
to
public
service broadcasting, to engage in
dialogue with pluralistic and
editorially independent electronic
media
and,
where necessary, to also
engage with the government and regulatory
authorities in this context.
Advantage
of the option
This
option has the advantage of a
readymade, well-established platform
that, with minimal resources
will
enable
a new, media-specific unit to initiate,
and to sustain its work, at
least in the short term.
Disadvantage
of this option
The
disadvantage with this option is
one of preconceived notions.
Existing civil society
organizations may
have
a prior, defined identity or perception
about their aims and their
agenda. They may also
already be
"controversial"
organizations situated in a
confrontationist or a "negative" relationship
with other segments
of
the society, the state, or even the
media.
A
"prior" specific, negative
identity or profile may
adversely affect the ability of the new,
media-specific unit
to
develop its work and
credibility.
OPTION
B:
Forming
a New Association
Citizens
who want to focus exclusively on the
role of media and are
willing to create an association
for this
specific
purpose. Once they have
decided to do so, the next
step is to choose between
different kinds of
organizations
i.e. societies, social
welfare bodies, trusts, not
for profit joint stock
companies, etc. They
should
then
apply for and obtain formal
registration under the laws and rules of
the country.
OPTION
C:
Forming
an Informal Network
Who
should adopt this option?
Citizens
who want to function as an informal
network of individuals and
groups that share an
interest in
pluralistic
media, in public service
broadcasting and in dialogue
with media and which works
together to
achieve
common goals.
The
disadvantage & advantage of this
option
While
this option has the disadvantage of
not being subject to a formal
process of registration and review,
its
informal
nature also offers the advantage of the
capacity to respond speedily to
new situations instead
of
waiting
for formal procedures to be
observed. This format also
offers operational flexibility and the
ability to
mobilize
diverse sources of support
that do not otherwise want to
become formally associated
with a specific
media
group over a long period of
time.
Eligibility
for Membership
Option
A:
Membership
for all citizens with
interest in Media
issues
With
this option, the organization may take an
open-ended approach, in that
membership is open to all
citizens
with an interest in media
issues. These would include
media practitioners those directly
associated
with
electronic media, even media
proprietors and senior
managers provided that they do
not constitute a
majority
of the members.
124
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
While
allowing media practitioners to become
members of citizens' media
association may sound
contradictory
and risky, such members may
prove to be useful. They bring
with them a specialized, relevant,
in-house
expertise _ and sometimes
even "insider" knowledge! _
which may subsequently
become available
to
the citizens' media group.
However,
there is also the disadvantage of direct
conflict of interest because
those professionally associated
with
media and dependent on media
for their income may
not be able to view the role
of media with the
independence
and impartiality required to give
credibility to the views and
policies of the citizens'
media
group.
OPTION
B:
Exclusive
Membership
This
would be the exclusivist option by
which membership would be open to
only those citizens who do
not
have
any direct association with electronic
media as employers or employees,
managers or practitioners.
By
ensuring that only citizens
outside electronic media are
viewing the media's role, citizens'
media groups
automatically
acquire a credible status at their
inception.
Option
C:
Categorizing
Membership
Category
1
Members
with voting rights and full
participation rights for citizens
who do not have any direct
professional
relationship
with media.
Category
2
Members
without voting rights who
could comprise associate
members to include citizens with a
direct
relationship
with the media. Their
presence in the citizens' bodies
would help to provide a
specialist media
perspective
to the other members.
Office
Bearers
While
merit and competence should be
amongst the determinant criteria to elect/nominate
office-bearers,
consideration
should also be given to inviting a person
of high eminence in a country to
accept the
chairmanship
of a citizens' media association as
his/her relationship with the forum
brings exceptional value,
credibility
and recognition.
For
instance: the fact that the chairman of
the Citizens' Media Commission of
Pakistan is the former
Chief
Justice
of the Supreme Court of Pakistan
has given this forum a notable degree of
public and media
recognition
and the Commission's meetings
and observations are
normally given wide coverage by
media.
Transparency
and accountability
Transparency
and accountability are ensured
through publication of regular
annual or periodic reports
that
contain
relevant details of the organization's activities
such as its fund management,
and the use of its
other
resources.
Thus the citizens' media
association should be able to ensure
accountability and transparency.
By
circulating such reports to the government, the media,
the members and the general
public, the association
would
set an example for the media
at large to emulate. This is especially
important because in
developing
countries,
even when media have made a
positive contribution in the field of
public service broadcasting,
they
are
not necessarily transparent about
themselves. For instance it is a
rare instance where media
will
acknowledge
the size of their audience
(viewers, listeners, readers) in
order to ensure that these
figures, if
lower
than advertisers', estimates or
expectations, do not adversely affect
their advertising revenue.
Size
of Group
Option
A:
Unlimited
Membership
A
literally logical approach to citizens'
participation would be that as electronic
media continue to reach
out
to
larger and larger numbers of
people, so too should any
group or association representing
viewers and
listeners
attempt to maximize its membership. If
the media reaches millions of people,
then such
associations
should
attempt to comprise at least thousands of
members.
125
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
While
this option does ostensibly
offer the advantage of attempting to be numerically
representative in terms
of
scale, the practical difficulties
also immediately suggest
themselves.
Unless
there is an incentive or reward system,
there would be very limited
motivation on the part of
thousands
of citizens to become members of
new forums. The average citizen is
already preoccupied
with
several
options competing for his/her time
and attention.
If
such forums are able to
attract members in thousands, the
task of managing a large number of
members
would
require significant logistical resources. This
requirement however would dilute and
distract from the
real
objective of forming such
bodies.
Nevertheless,
in theory, as the numbers-based option,
Option A needs to be noted
for the record.
Option
B:
Representative
Membership
To
assemble a group of about 30 to 40
individuals in a city, or in rural or
urban districts, that
represent
principal
professional sectors as well as
representing a balance of gender,
age, and, where applicable,
ethnic
and
linguistic features of the population in an
area.
Such
groups would symbolically as well as
substantially represent the different
categories and classes
of
citizens
who maintain regular contact
with media and take
more than a normal interest in
media issues.
Option
C:
Small
Groups
To
assemble a group of up to 10 people who
are a tightly-knit, highly
cohesive, well-disciplined and
sharply
focused
team. This team would be
clear about its mission
and would work single-mindedly
over a period of
time.
They would not be restricted by the
difficulty associated with
managing large numbers of
people,
unhindered
by dealing with diverse
opinions and contrasting perspectives,
and possible clashes
of
personalities
within the group. As such they would be
able to work with intensity
and make an impact. Such
a
small
group could be termed as a collective version of the
singular character of Ralph Nader of the
USA who,
over
a period of about 40 years,
has remained a relentless champion of
consumer interests in the
USA.
Mode
of Governance
Option
A:
Elective
Mode
In
keeping with globally preferred norms of
democracy, the forum adopting an
elective mode should
follow
the
process of formal election of its
representative office bearers,
regardless of its size.
Experience suggests
that
a one-year term is too short to allow the
representative to be productive and
have an impact. Therefore
it
is
suggested that a 2-year term
would be ideal. The office
bearers would then serve in
their respective
capacities
as president, vice president,
secretary, treasurer, etc.,
each with conventionally
defined areas of
responsibilities.
The
number of terms that each
office bearer can serve
consecutively may be limited to
two consecutive
terms.
Limiting the number of terms for
office bearers (as
recommended by Voice of the Listener &
Viewer,
UK),
has the advantage of encouraging
new leadership to emerge and
of discouraging prolonged
and
personalized
leadership. However a limit of
two consecutive terms also
brings with it the disadvantage
of
enabling
discontinuity in momentum and direction.
Even as an association retains
its long-term aims, a
change
of personality occupying a certain
position can often result in
a change of emphasis or shift
in
priorities
that is not always in the
best interest of the cause being
pursued.
Option
B:
Consensual
Nomination Mode
This
option would only apply to a
group whose size does
not exceed 8 to 10 people.
A
compact group of about 8 to 10 people
need not necessarily rotate
leadership out of the obligation
for
periodic
change for the sake of
change alone. If there is a
high level of trust and respect
for each other, a
small
group can permit and
support the same people from
amongst the group to continue with the
tasks they
are
best suited to render.
126
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
Equally,
the rotation of office within
such a small group is not
subject to the competitive, wasteful,
often
acrimonious
partisanship that marks
elections in forums where the number of
members exceeds 40 to 50
people.
To be a non-elective forum is not
necessarily to be non-accountable or non-transparent.
Given the
values
of integrity and sincerity of
purpose in a small and
dedicated group it is possible to
ensure that high
ethical
standards of conduct are
maintained.
The
remaining part of this particular text, comprising
possible aims and objectives
of new citizens'
associations
of viewers and listeners,
guidelines on how to obtain
funding, observations on
formulating
model
statutes/constitutions and a background note
are available on the website
cited earlier.
127
Table of Contents:
|
|||||