|
|||||
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
Lesson
29
"THE
EUROPEAN UNION"
Note:
the text of this handout is
excerpted from the publication in
brochure form titled: Europe in
12
lessons"
by Pascal Fontaine, published by the European
Commission, Directorate-General for Press
and
Communication
Publication, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium in
October 2003.
Students
are advised to visit the EU
website at europa.eu.int/comm./publications to
obtain further relevant
information
on the EU provided in this publication as
well as in a whole series of
similar publication.
In
2005, as a result of negative
votes by citizens of major European
countries against a draft
constitution for
the
EU, new debates and
speculations have begun on the
need to conduct comprehensive reforms
and to
bring
the EU system closer to public
opinion at the grass-roots level. To keep
themselves well-informed on
this
on-going debate, students
are advised to observe
programmes on the BBC World
Service TV and
analysis
printed from time to time in leading
newspapers and journals.
The
merit of this particular text in this
handout is that it provides students
with information which is
rarely
reported
in the daily news media and
helps them appreciate the actual,
practical work done at the
grass-roots
level
by the EU.
What
does the Union
do?
The
people who drafted the Treaty of
Rome set the following task
for the European Economic Community:
`by
establishing a common market and
progressively approximating the economic
policies of member states, to promote
throughout
the
Community a harmonious development of
economic activities, a continuous and
balanced expansion, an increase in
stability,
an
accelerated raising of the
standard of living and closer
relations between the States
belonging to it.'
These
goals have been largely
achieved, thanks to the free movement of
goods, people, services and
capital
and
to the EU's policy of ensuring
fair competition between
businesses and protecting
consumer interests.
The
single market was completed
in 1993 and the euro came
into circulation in
2002.
But,
to enable all sectors of the
economy and all regions of
Europe to benefit from these
achievements, they
had
to be backed up by `structural' policies
financed and pursued with commitment
and determination by the
EU
itself.
Europe's
political leaders realised
early in that European solidarity
would mean taking action to
strengthen
`economic
and social cohesion' in
other words, to narrow the gap
between richer and poorer
regions. In
practice,
this meant introducing regional and
social policies, and these
policies have become more
important
with
each successive enlargement of the
EU.
Regional
action
The
EU's regional policy consists
essentially of making payments from the
EU budget to disadvantaged
regions
and sections of the population.
The total amount allocated in
2000-2006 is 213 billion.
The
payments
are used to boost development in backward
regions, to convert old industrial
zones, to help young
people
and the long-term un-employed find
work, to modernise farming
and to help less-favoured
rural areas.
The
money is paid through specific funds
the European Regional Development
Fund (ERDF), the
European
Social Fund (ESF), the Financial
Instrument for Fisheries Guidance
(FIFG) and the European
Agricultural
Guidance and Guarantee Fund
(EAGGF, also commonly known by
its French acronym
FEOGA).
These
payments top up or stimulate investment
by the private sector and by
national and regional
governments.
To target the payments where they
will have the greatest effect, the EU
has set itself three
priority
objectives:
86
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
Objective
1 is to help develop regions where the
wealth produced divided by the number
of
inhabitants
technically known as `gross
domestic product (GDP) per
capita' is less than 75%
of
the
EU average. This aid, amounting to
135 billion, is two-thirds of
all the money allocated
to
regional
policy in 2000-2006. It does to
benefit about 50 regions,
representing 22% of the EU's
population.
It is used to get the economy
moving in these regions by
creating the infrastructure they
lack,
providing better training for
local people and stimulating investment in local
business.
Objective
2 is to help the regions in difficulty.
They may be areas where the
economy is being
restructured,
declining rural areas, fishing
communities in crisis or urban areas
with serious
problems.
Objective
3 is to combat unemployment by modernising training
systems and helping to
create jobs.
Specific
programmes aimed at these
objectives include Interreg,
which
promotes co-operation
across
borders and between regions,
and Urban
which supports the sustainable
development of
cities
and urban areas in
crisis.
In
addition to these `structural' funds
there is a `Cohesion Fund'.
This is used to finance
transport
infrastructure
and environmental projects in EU
countries whose per capita
GDP is less than 90% of the EU
average.
The countries concerned
until now have been
Greece, Ireland, Portugal and
Spain.
Thanks
to structural schemes such as these,
financed by the European Union, EU countries
have been better
able
to bring their economies
into line with one
another. This economic `convergence' is
also the result of
action
by EU governments to meet the
requirements for economic
and monetary union.
Extending
structural policy to embrace
the new member
states
Enlarging
the Union to take in 10 new
member states will pose a
major challenge for economic
and social
cohesion,
because development in some regions of
these countries lags well
behind the rest of the
EU.
Enlargement
will, in fact, make the
Union more diverse and
require further efforts at sectoral
and regional
adjustment.
A
number of `instruments' are already being
used to help the candidate
countries. First there is the Phare
programme,
which channels aid to the
candidate countries in central
and eastern Europe. Over the
period
2000
to 2006 they will receive a
total of 10.9 billion in
`pre-accession' aid.
Then
there is ISPA
(Instrument
for Structural Policies or
Pre-Accession), which finances
environmental and
transport
projects and has a budget of
7.2 billion.
Thirdly,
Sapard
(an
instrument for financing agriculture) has
a budget of 3.6 billion. After
accession (i.e.
after
the new member states join),
the Structural Fund programmes
and Cohesion Fund projects
will take
over
from pre-accession
aid.
The
social dimension
The
aim of the EU's social
policy is to correct the most glaring
inequalities in European society.
The
European
Social Fund (ESF) was
set up in 1961 to promote
job creation and help
workers move from one
type
of work and one geographical
area to another. For 2003,
the ESF was allocated 4.8
billion from the
EU
budget.
Financial
aid is not the only way in
which the EU seeks to improve
social conditions in Europe.
Aid alone
could
never solve all the problems
caused by economic recession or by
regional under-development. Social
progress
springs, first and foremost,
from economic growth and is
nurtured by both national
and EU
policies.
Social
progress is also supported by legislation
that guarantees all EU
citizens a solid set of basic rights.
Some
of
these rights are enshrined in the
Treaties for example, the
right of men and women to
equal pay for
equal
work. Others are set out in
directives about the protection of
workers (health and safety at
work) and
essential
safety standards.
87
Globalization
of Media MCM404
VU
In
December 1991, the Maastricht European
Council adopted the Community Charter of
basic social rights,
setting
out the rights all workers in the EU
should enjoy: free movement; fair
pay; improved working
conditions;
social protection; the right to
form associations and to
undertake collective bargaining; the
right
to
vocational training; equal treatment of
women and men; worker
information, consultation and
participation;
health protection and safety at the
work-place; protection for children, the elderly
and the
disabled.
At Amsterdam in June 1997, this
Charter became an integral part of the
Treaty and is applicable
in
all
the member states.
Employment
Policy
During
the final decade of the 20th century, EU citizens were
increasingly calling on their governments
to take
more
vigorous action to create jobs. How could
Europeans believe in the benefits of European
integration
and
have confidence in its future
while more than 10% of the
EU's workforce (until 1997)
were unemployed?
So
a new chapter on employment was
inserted into the Treaty of
Amsterdam, making job creation a
priority
for
the EU's economic
policy.
At
the European Council in Luxembourg on 20
and 21 November 1997, the
leaders of the 15 member
states
agreed
a coordinated strategy for making their
individual national policies
more effective. It was a strategy
for
better
vocational training, for helping
start up new businesses and
for improving `social dialogue'
i.e.
relations
between employers and
employees. It laid down
guidelines for boosting employment.
Progress on
implementing
these guidelines is regularly reviewed by
the member states and the EU
institutions, using a
jointly
agreed assessment
procedure.
The
`Luxembourg strategy' was beefed up
and given a broader scope by the European
Council in Lisbon in
March
2000. It became the `Lisbon strategy',
and it was directed towards
a new and very ambitious goal:
to
make
the EU, within a decade,
`the
most competitive and dynamic
knowledge-based economy in the world,
capable of
sustainable
growth with more and better
jobs and greater social
cohesion'.
88
Table of Contents:
|
|||||