|
|||||
Research
Methods STA630
VU
Lesson
36
NON-REACTIVE
RESEARCH
Experiments
and surveys research are
both reactive;
that is, the people being
studied are aware of
the
fact
that they are being
studied. In non-reactive
research,
those being studied are
not aware that
they
are
part of a research project.
Such a research is largely
based on positivistic principles
but is also used
by
interpretive and critical
researchers.
The
Logic of Non-Reactive Research
The
critical thing about
non-reactive or unobtrusive
measures (i.e.
the measures that are not
obtrusive or
intrusive)
is that the people being
studied are not aware of it
but leave evidence of their social
behavior
or
actions `naturally." The researcher
infers from the evidence to behavior or
attitudes without
disrupting
those being studied.
Unnoticed observation is also a
type of non-reactive measure.
For
example,
a researcher may be observing the
behavior of drivers from a
distance whether drivers
stopped
at
red sign of the traffic lights.
The observations can be made
both at the day time and at
night. It could
also
be noted whether the driver
was a male or a female; whether the
driver was also or with
passengers;
whether
other traffic was present;
and whether thee car
came to a complete stop, a slow stop, or no
stop.
Varieties
of Non-Reactive Observations
Non-reactive
measures are varied, and
researchers have been creative in
inventing indirect ways to
measures
behaviors. Because the measures have
little in common except being
non-reactive, they
are
best
learned through examples
like:
Physical
Traces:
·
Erosion:
Wear and tear suggests a
greater use. For example, a
researcher examines children's
toys
at a children's play centre
that were purchased at the same
time. Worn out toys
suggest
greater
interest of children in them.
·
Accretion:
Accumulation
of physical evidence suggests behavior. A
researcher examines the
soft
drink cans or bottles in the
garbage collection. That
might indicate the brands and
types
of
soft drinks that are
very popular.
Archives:
·
Running
Records: Regularly
produced public records may
reveal lot of information.
For
example,
a researcher may examine marriage
records for brides' and
grooms' recorded ages.
The
differences might indicate
that males marrying younger
females are greater than the
other
way
around.
·
Other
Records: Irregular
or private records can
reveal a lot. For example, a
researcher may
look
into the number of reams of paper
purchased by a college principal's
office for the last 10
years
and compare it with students'
enrollment.
Observations:
·
External
Appearance: How
people appear may indicate
social factors. For example,
a
researcher
watches students to see
whether they are more likely
to wear their college's colors
and
symbols after the college team
won or lost.
·
Count
Behaviors: Counting
how many people do something
can be informative. For
example
a
researcher may count the number of
men and women who come to a
full stop and those
who
come
to a rolling stop at a traffic
stop sign. This suggests
gender difference in driving
behavior.
·
Time
Duration: How
long people take to do
things may indicate their
intention. For example
a
researcher may measure how
long men and women
pause in front of a particular
painting.
Time
taken may indicate their
interest in the painting.
124
Research
Methods STA630
VU
Recording
and Documentation
Creating
non-reactive measures follows the
logic of quantitative measurement,
although qualitative
researchers
also use non-reactive observations. A
researcher first conceptualizes a construct, and
then
links
the construct to non-reactive empirical evidence,
which is its measure. The
operational definition
of
the variable includes how the
researcher systematically notes
and records observations.
Content
Analysis
Content
analysis is a technique for gathering and
analyzing the content of a text. The
content
refers
to
words,
meanings, pictures, symbols, ideas, themes, or
any message that can be
communicated. The text
is
anything written, visual, or spoken
that serves as a medium of
communication. Possible
artifacts for
study
could
be books, newspaper or magazine articles,
advertisements, poems, letters, laws,
constitutions,
dramas, speeches, official
documents, films or videotapes, musical
lyrics, photographs,
articles
of clothing, or works of arts. All
these works may be called as
documents. The documents
can
be:
·
Personal
letters, diary, autobiography.
·
Non-personal
interoffice memos, official
documents, proceedings of a meeting.
·
Mass
media newspapers, magazines,
fiction, films, songs,
poems, works of arts.
Content
analysis goes back nearly a century
and is used in many fields
literature, history,
journalism,
political
science, education, psychology,
sociology, and so on. It is also
called a study of
communication,
which means who says
what, to whom, why, how,
and with what
effect.
In
content analysis, the researcher uses
objective and systematic counting and
recording procedures to
produce
a quantitative description of the
symbolic content in a text. It may
also be called "textual
coding."
There
are qualitative versions of content analysis.
The emphasis here is
quantitative data
about
a text's content.
Content
Analysis is Non-Reactive: It is
non-reactive because the placing of
words, messages, or
symbols
in a text to communicate to the reader or
receiver occurs without
influence from the
researcher
who
analyzes its contents. There
is no interaction between the researcher
and the creator of the text
under
analysis.
Content
analysis lets a researcher reveal the
contents (i.e. messages, meanings,
symbols, etc.) in a
source
of communication (i.e. a book,
article, movie, etc.). It lets him/her
probe into and
discover
content
in a different way from
ordinary way of reading a
book or watching a television
program.
With
content analysis, a researcher can
compare content across many
texts and analyze it with
quantitative
techniques (table, charts). In addition,
he or she can reveal aspects
of the text's content
that
are
difficult to see. For
example, you might watch
television commercials and feel that
women are
mostly
portrayed working in the house,
cooking food, using
detergents, looking after
children. Content
analysis
can document in objective,
quantitative terms whether or
not your vague feelings
based on
unsystematic
observation are true. It
yields repeatable, precise results
about the text.
Content
analysis involves random sampling,
precise measurement, and operational
definitions for
abstract
constructs. Coding turns aspects of
content that represent variables
into numbers. After a
content
analysis researcher gathers the data, he
or she enters them into
computers and analyzes
them
with
statistics in the same way
that an experiment or survey
researcher would.
Measurement
and Coding
Careful
measurement is crucial in content analysis
because a researcher takes
different and murky
symbolic
communication and turns it into precise,
objective, quantitative data. He or
she carefully
125
Research
Methods STA630
VU
designs
and documents the procedures for
coding to make replication possible.
For example, a
researcher
wants to determine how
frequently television dramas
portray elderly characters in
terms of
negative
stereotypes. He or she develops a measure
of the construct "negatively stereotypes of
the
elderly."
The conceptualization may
result in a list of stereotypes or
negative generalizations
about
older
people (e.g., senile, forgetful,
frail, hard of hearing,
slow, ill, inactive,
conservative, etc.) that do
not
accurately reflect the elderly. Another
example could be negative
stereotypes about
women.
Constructs
in content analysis are operationalizing
with a coding
system, a set
of instructions or rules on
how
to systematically observe and record content
from text. Look at the construct of
"leadership role;"
for
measuring this construct written rules
should be provided telling
how to classify people. Same
is
about
the concept of "social class." In case
the researcher has three categories of
upper, middle, and
lower
class then the researcher
must tell what are the
characteristics that are
associated with upper
class,
middle
class, and the lower class
so that the coders could
easily classify people in the three
proposed
categories.
Observations
can be structured: Measurement in
content analysis uses structured
observation i.e.
systematic,
careful observation based on
written rules. The rules explain
how to categorize and classify
observations
in terms of:
·
Frequency:
Frequency simply means counting
whether or not something occurs and
how
often
(how many times). For
example how many elderly
people appear on a
television
program
within a given week? What
percentage of all characteristics
are they, or in what
percentage
of programs do they appear.
·
Direction:
Direction
is noting the direction of messages in
thee content along some
continuum
(e.g., positive or negative, supporting
or opposed). For example the
researcher
devises
a list of ways an elderly television
character can act. Some
are positive (e.g.,
friendly,
wise,
considerate) and some are
negative (e.g., nasty, dull,
selfish).
·
Intensity:
Intensity
is the strength or power of a message in a
direction. For example,
the
characteristic
of forgetfulness can be minor (e.g.
not remembering to take the keys
when
leaving
home, taking time to recall the
name of someone whom you
have not seen in years)
or
major
(e.g., not remembering your name,
not recognizing your
children.
·
Space:
A
researcher can record the size of the
text message or the amount of space or
volume
allocated
to it. Space in written text
is measured by counting words, sentences,
paragraphs, or
space
on a page (e.g. square inches) for
video or audio text, space
can be measured by the
amount
of time allocated. For
example, a TV character may be
present for a few seconds
or
continuously
in every seen of a two hour
program.
The
unit analysis can vary a great
deal in content analysis. It can be a
word, a phrase, a theme, a
plot,, a
news
paper article, a character, and so
forth.
Coding
The
process of identifying and
classifying each item and
giving labels to each category.
Later on each
category
may be assigned a numerical
value for its entry
into the computer. In content analysis one
can
look
at the manifest coding and latent
coding.
Manifest
Coding: Coding
the visible, surface content in a
text is called manifest
coding. For example,
a
researcher counts the number of times a
phrase or word (e.g. red)
appears in the written text,
or
whether
a specific action (e.g. shaking
hands) appears in a photograph or
video scene. The
coding
system
lists terms or actions or characters
that are then located in
text. A researcher can use a
computer
program
to search for words or phrases in the
text and have a computer do the counting
work.
Manifest
coding is highly reliable
because the phrase or the word
either is or is not present.
However,
manifest
coding does not take the
connotation of word into account.
The same word can
take on
126
Research
Methods STA630
VU
different
meanings depending on the context.
The possibility that there
are multiple meanings of a
word
limits
the measurement validity of manifest
coding.
Latent
Coding: A
researcher using latent
coding (also
called semantic
analysis)
looks for the
underlying
meaning in the content of a text. For
example, the researcher reads the
entire paragraph and
decides
whether it contains vulgar themes or a
romantic mood. His or her
coding system has
general
rules
to guide his or her interpretation of the
text and for determining
whether particular themes or
mood
are
present.
Latent
coding tends to be less
reliable than the manifest
coding. It depends on a coder's
knowledge of
language
and its social meaning. Training,
practice, and written rules improve
reliability, but still it
is
difficult
to consistently identify themes,
moods, and the like.
Keeping
in view the amount of work,
often a number of coders are
hired. The researcher trains
the
coders
in coding system. Coders
should understand the variables, follow
the coding system, and
ask
about
ambiguities. A researcher who
uses several coders must
always check for consistency
across
coders.
He or she does this by
asking coders to code the
same text independently and
then checking for
consistency
across coders. The
researcher measures inter-coder
reliability, a type of
equivalence
reliability,
with a statistical coefficient
that tells the degree of
consistency across among coders.
The
coefficient
is always reported with the
results of content analysis
research.
How
to Conduct Content Analysis
Research
Question
Formulation: As in
most research, content analysis
researchers begin with a
research
question.
When the question involves
variables that are messages
or symbols, content analysis may be
appropriate.
For example, how women
are portrayed in advertisements?
The construct here is
the
portrayal
of women which may be
measured by looking at the activities
they are shown to be doing,
the
occupations
in which they are employed,
the way decision making is
taking place, etc.
Unit
of Analysis: A
researcher decides on the unit of
analysis (i.e. the amount of text that is
assigned a
code).
In the previous example each
advertisement may be a unit of
analysis.
Sampling:
Researchers
often use random sampling in content
analysis. First, they define
the
population
and the sampling element. For example,
the population might be all
words, all sentences,
all
paragraphs,
or all articles in certain type of
documents over a period of
specified period. Likewise,
it
could
include each conversation,
situation, scene, or episode of a certain
type of television program
over
a
specified time period. Let
us consider that we want to know
how women are portrayed in
weekly
news
magazines. The unit of analysis is the
article. The population
includes all articles published
in
weekly
news magazines during 2001
to 2007. Make a list of
English magazines that were
published
during
the said period. Define what
is a news magazine? Define
what is an article? Decide on
the
number
of magazines. Decide on the sample
size. Make a sampling frame.
Here the sampling frame
shall
be all the articles published in the
selected magazines during
2001 to 2007. Finally draw
the
random
sample using table of random
numbers.
Variables
and Constructing Coding Categories: Say
a researcher is interested in women's
portrayal
in
significant leadership roles. Define
"significant leadership role" in
operational terms and put it
as
written
rules for classifying people
named in the articles. Say the researcher
is further interested in
positive
leadership roles, so the measure will
indicate whether the role
was positive or
negative.
Researcher
has to make a list of adjectives
and phrases reflective of the leadership
role being positive
or
negative.
If someone in the article is referred to
with one of the adjective, then the
direction is decided.
For
example, the terms brilliant
and
top
performer are
positive, whereas drug
kingpin and
uninspired
are
negative. Researcher should
give written rules to classify
role of women as portrayed in the
articles.
127
Research
Methods STA630
VU
In
addition to written rules for
coding decisions, a content analysis researcher
creates a recording
sheet
(also
called a coding
form or
tally
sheet) on
which to record the information. Each
unit should have a
separate
recording sheet.
Inferences:
The
inference a researcher can or cannot
make on the basis of results is
critical in content
analysis.
Content analysis describes what is in the
text. It cannot reveal the intentions of
those who
created
the text or the effects that messages in
the text have on those who
receive them.
128
Table of Contents:
|
|||||