|
|||||
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
Lesson
39
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Learning
objectives
The
main objective of this chapter to enable
to students about research
and development issue relating
to
strategy implementation.
Going
public means selling off a
specific percentage of the business to
others in order to raise
capital;
consequently,
it shifts the owners' control of the
firm. Going public is not
recommended for
companies
that
initial costs can be too
high for the firm to
generate sufficient amount of cash
inflows to make
going
public worthwhile. The firm
must have sufficient amount of
capital to bear out
lawyer,
underwriter
and other documentation cost in
order to form the business. In
addition to initial
costs
involved
with a stock offering, there
are costs and obligations
associated with reporting
and
management
in a publicly held firm. For firms
with more than $10
million in sales, going public
can
provide
major advantages:
1.
It can allow the firm to
raise capital to develop new
products,
2.
To build plants,
3.
Expand, grow, and market
products and services more
effectively.
Before
going public, a firm must
have quality management with
a proven track record for
achieving
quality
earnings and positive cash
flow. The company also
should enjoy growing demand for
its
products.
Sales growth of about 5 or 6 percent a
year is good for a private
firm, but shareholders
expect
public
companies to grow around 10 to 15 percent
per year.
Research
and Development (R&D)
Issues
Research
and development (R&D)
management can plays part in
strategy implementation.
"New
products and improvement of existing products
that allow for effective
strategy implementation"
OR
"New
products and improvement of existing products
that allow for
effective
strategy
implementation"
These
individuals are generally
charged with developing new products
and improving old products in
a
way
that will allow effective
strategy implementation. R&D employees
and managers perform tasks
that
include
1.
Transferring complex technology,
2.
Adjusting processes to local
raw materials,
3.
Adapting processes to local
markets,
4.
Altering products to particular tastes
and specifications.
Strategies
such as product development, market
penetration, and concentric
diversification require that
new
products be successfully developed and
that old products be significantly
improved. But the level
of
management support for R&D is
often constrained by resource
availability:
Technological
improvements that
both affect consumer and
industrial products and services
shorten
product
life cycles. Companies in
virtually every industry are
relying on the development of new
products
and services to fuel
profitability and
growth.
Surveys
suggest that the most
successful organizations use an R&D
strategy that ties
external
opportunities
to internal strength and is
linked with objectives.
Well-formulated R&D policies
match
market
opportunities with internal
capabilities and provide an
initial screen to all ideas
generated. R&D
policies
can enhance strategy-implementation
efforts to:
1.
Develop robotics or manual-type
processes.
2.
Spend a high, average, or
low amount of money on R&D.
3.
Perform R&D within the firm or to
contract R&D to outside firms.
4.
Use university researchers or private
sector researchers.
5.
Emphasize product or process
improvements.
6.
Stress basic or applied
research.
7.
Be leaders or followers in
R&D.
There
must be effective interactions between R&D
departments and other
functional departments in
implementing
different types of generic
business strategies. Conflicts
between marketing,
finance/accounting,
R&D, and information systems
departments can be minimized with
clear policies
and
objectives. Table gives some
examples of R&D activities that could be required
for successful
140
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
implementation
of various strategies. Many American
utility, energy, and
automotive companies
are
employing
their research and development
departments to determine how the
firm can effectively
reduce
its greenhouse gas
emissions.
Research
and Development Involvement in Selected
Strategy-
Implementation
Situations
TYPE
OF
STRATEGY
BEING
ORGANIZATION
IMPLEMENTED
R&D
ACTIVITY
Cosmetic
Concentric
Add
face wash for the user
in
Manufacturer
diversification
addition
to other make-up
items.
Plastic
container
Market
penetration
Develop
a biodegradable
manufacturer
container.
Electronics
Market
development
Develop
a telecommunications
company
system
in a foreign country.
Pharmaceutical
Product
development
Develop
a procedure for
testing
company
the
effects of a new drug on
different
subgroups.
Many
firms wrestle with the decision to
acquire R&D expertise from external
firms or to develop R&D
expertise
internally. The following
guidelines can be used to
help make this
decision:
1.
If the rate of technical progress is
slow, the rate of market growth is
moderate, and there
are
significant
barriers to possible new
entrants, then in-house R&D is the
preferred solution. The
reason
is that R&D, if successful, will
result in a temporary product or process
monopoly that the
company
can exploit.
2.
If technology is changing rapidly and the
market is growing slowly, then a major
effort in R&D may
be
very risky, because it may lead to
development of an ultimately obsolete technology or
one for
which
there is no market.
3.
If technology is changing slowly but the
market is growing fast,
there generally is not enough
time
for
in-house development. The prescribed
approach is to obtain R&D expertise
on an exclusive or
nonexclusive
basis from an outside
firm.
4.
If both technical progress
and market growth are
fast, R&D expertise should be obtained
through
acquisition
of a well-established firm in the
industry.
There
are at least three major R&D
approaches for implementing
strategies.
1.
First firm to market new technological
products
2.
Be an innovative imitator of successful
products
3.
Low-cost producer of similar but less
expensive products
The
first strategy is to be the
first firm to market new
technological products. This is a
glamorous and
exciting
strategy but also a
dangerous one.
A
second R&D approach
is to be an innovative imitator of
successful products, thus
minimizing the
risks
and costs of start-up. This
approach entails allowing a pioneer
firm to develop the first version
of
the
new product and to
demonstrate that a market
exists. Then, laggard firms develop a
similar product.
This
strategy requires excellent R&D
personnel and an excellent marketing
department.
A
third R&D strategy is to be a low-cost
producer by mass-producing products similar to
but less
expensive
than products recently introduced.
Perhaps
the most current trend in R&D
management has been lifting
the veil of secrecy whereby
firms,
even
major competitors, are joining forces to
develop new products. Collaboration is on
the rise due to
new
competitive pressures, rising research
costs, increasing regulatory issues,
and accelerated
product
development
schedules.
141
Table of Contents:
|
|||||