|
|||||
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
Lesson
38
FINANCE/ACCOUNTING
ISSUES
Learning
objectives
The
main objective of this chapter to enable
to students about accounting
and finance issue relating
to
strategy
implementation.
Like
marketing and human resource
concern while implementing strategy the
other important issue
is
accounting
and finance.
Several
issue that concern with
accounting and finance to
strategy
implementation:
obtaining desired amount of
needed
capital, developing pro forma
financial
statements,
preparing financial budgets, and evaluating the
worth of a business. Some
examples of
decisions
that may require finance/accounting
policies are:
1.
To raise the amount of capital by issuing
shares or obtaining a debt
from external parties.
2.
To enhance the inventory turn
over level
3.
To make or buy fixed
assets.
4.
To extend the time of accounts
receivable.
5.
To establish a certain percentage
discount on accounts within a specified
period of time.
6.
To determine the amount of cash that
should be kept on hand
7.
To determine an appropriate dividend payout
ratio.
8.
To use LIFO, FIFO
Acquiring
Capital to Implement
Strategies
Without
sufficient amount of capital the strategy
can not be proceed. Two
basic sources of capital
for
an
organization are debt and
equity. Creditors have a debt right
and owners have an equity
right in the
business.
An appropriate mix of debt and equity in
a firm's capital structure plays an
important role for
strategy
implementation. The most important is
debt and equity analysis.
The debt
to equity ratio
(D/E)
is a financial
ratio,
which is equal to an entity's total
liabilities
divided
by shareholders'
equity.
The
two components are often
taken from the firm's balance
sheet (or
statement of financial position),
but
they might also be calculated
using their market values if
both the company's debt and
equity are
publicly
traded.
It is used to calculate a company's
"financial
leverage"
and indicates what proportion
of
equity
and debt the company is
using to finance its
assets.
D/E
= Debt (total liabilities) /
Equity
A
similar ratio is debt to total
assets (D/A)
D/A
= debt / assets = debt / (debt +
equity)
It
also include an Earnings per
Share/Earnings before Interest and Taxes
(EPS/EBIT) analysis is the
most
widely used technique for
determining whether debt, stock, or a combination of
debt and stock is
the
best alternative for raising
capital to implement strategies. This
technique involves an examination
of
the impact that debt versus
stock financing has on
earnings per share under various
assumptions as
to
EBIT.
DEBIT
A
financial measure defined as revenues
less cost of goods sold
and selling, general, and
administrative
expenses.
In other words, operating and no
operating profit
before
the deduction of interest
and
income
taxes.
Earning
Per share
A
company's profit
divided
by its number of outstanding
shares.
If a company earning Rs. 2
million in
one
year had Rs. 2 million
shares of stock
outstanding,
its EPS would be Rs. 1
per share. In
calculating
EPS,
the company often uses a weighted
average
of
shares outstanding over the reporting
term. The
one-year
(historical) EPS growth rate is
calculated as the percentage change in
earnings per share.
The
prospective
EPS growth rate is
calculated as the percentage change in
this year's earnings and
the
consensus
forecast earnings for next
year.
Theoretically,
an enterprise should have enough debt in
its capital structure to boost
its return on
investment
by applying debt to products and
projects earning more than
the cost of the debt. In low
135
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
earning
periods, too much debt in the
capital structure of an organization can
endanger stockholders'
return
and jeopardize company survival.
Fixed debt obligations generally
must be met, regardless
of
circumstances.
This does not mean
that stock issuances are
always better than debt for
raising capital.
Some
special concerns with stock
issuances are dilution of ownership,
effect on stock price, and
the
need
to share future earnings
with all new
shareholders.
EPS/EBIT
analysis is a valuable tool
for making capital financing
decisions needed to implement
strategies,
but several considerations should be
made whenever using this
technique. First, profit
levels
may
be higher for stock or debt alternatives
when EPS levels are lower.
For example, looking only
at
the
earnings after taxes (EAT)
values in Table 8-3, the common
stock option is the best
alternative,
regardless
of economic conditions. If the Brown
Company's mission includes strict
profit
maximization,
as opposed to the maximization of stockholders' wealth
or some other criterion,
then
stock
rather than debt is the best choice of
financing.
Another
consideration when using EPS/EBIT
analysis is flexibility. As an
organization's capital
structure
changes, so does its
flexibility for considering
future capital needs. Using
all debt or all
stock
to
raise capital in the present
may impose fixed obligations, restrictive
covenants, or other
constraints
that
could severely reduce a firm's ability to
raise additional capital in the
future.
Pro
Forma Financial
Statements
Pro
forma (projected) financial
statement analysis is a
central strategy-implementation technique
because it
allows
an organization to examine the expected
results of various actions
and approaches.
"A
financial statement showing the forecast or projected
operating results and balance
sheet, as in pro
forma
income statements, balance
sheets, and statements of
cash flows."
USES
OF PRO FORMA
STATEMENTS
BUSINESS
PLANNING A
company uses pro forma
statements in the process of business
planning
and
control. Because pro forma
statements are presented in a
standardized, columnar format,
management
employs them to compare and
contrast alternative business plans. By
arranging the data
for
the operating and financial statements
side-by-side, management analyzes the
projected results of
competing
plans in order to decide
which best serves the
interests of the business.
In
constructing pro forma statements, a
company recognizes the uniqueness
and distinct financial
characteristics
of each proposed plan or project. Pro
forma statements allow
management to:
·
Identify
the assumptions about the financial and operating
characteristics that generate
the
scenarios.
·
Develop
the various sales and budget
(revenue and expense)
projections.
·
Assemble
the results in profit and
loss projections.
·
Translate
this data into cash-flow
projections.
·
Compare
the resulting balance sheets.
·
Perform
ratio analysis to compare projections
against each other and
against those of similar
companies.
·
Review
proposed decisions in marketing,
production, research and development,
etc., and assess
their
impact on profitability and
liquidity.
Simulating
competing plans can be quite
useful in evaluating the financial effects of the
different
alternatives
under consideration. Based on different
sets of assumptions, these
plans propose various
scenarios
of sales, production costs,
profitability, and viability. Pro
forma statements for each
plan
provide
important information about
future expectations, including
sales and earnings
forecasts, cash
flows,
balance sheets, proposed capitalization,
and income
statements.
Management
also uses this procedure in
choosing among budget alternatives.
Planners present
sales
revenues,
production expenses, balance
sheet and cash flow
statements for competing plans
with the
underlying
assumptions explained. Based on an
analysis of these figures,
management selects an
annual
budget.
After choosing a course of action, it is
common for management to examine
variations within
the
plan.
It
includes:
1.
Pro forma income
statement
2.
Pro forma balance sheet
etc.
136
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
Pro
forma income
statement
A
pro forma income statement
is similar to a historical income
statement, except it projects the
future
rather
than tracks the past. Pro
forma income statements are
an important tool for
planning future
business
operations. If the projections predict a downturn in
profitability, you can make
operational
changes
such as increasing prices or
decreasing costs before these projections
become reality.
Pro
forma income statements
provide an important benchmark or budget
for operating a business
throughout
the year. They can determine
whether expenses can be expected to
run higher in the first
quarter
of the year than in the second. They can
determine whether or not sales
can be expected to be
run
above average in June. The
can determine whether or not
your marketing campaigns need an
extra
boost
during the fall months. All in all, they
provide you with invaluable
information--the sort of
information
you need in order to make
the right choices for your
business.
How
do I create a pro forma
income statement?
Sit
down with an income
statement from the current year.
Consider how each item on
that statement
can
or will be changed during the coming
year. This should, ideally, be done before
year's end. You
will
need
to estimate final sales and
expenses for the current year to
prepare a pro forma income
statement
for
the coming year.
Pro
forma balance
sheet
A
pro forma balance sheet is
similar to a historical balance sheet,
but it represents a future
projection.
Pro
forma balance sheets are
used to project how the
business will be managing
its assets in the
future.
For
example, a pro forma balance
sheet can quickly show the
projected relative amount of money
tied
up
in receivables, inventory, and equipment.
It can also be used to
project the overall financial
soundness
of the company. For example, a
pro forma balance sheet
can help quickly pinpoint a
high
debt-to-equity
ratio.
This
type of analysis can be used to
forecast the impact of various
implementation decisions
(for
example,
to increase promotion expenditures by 50
percent to support a market-development
strategy,
to
increase salaries by 25 percent to
support a market-penetration strategy, to
increase research and
development
expenditures by 70 percent to support
product development, or to sell $1
million of
common
stock to raise capital for
diversification). Nearly all financial
institutions require at least
three
years
of projected financial statements whenever a
business seeks capital. A
pro forma income
statement
and balance sheet allow an
organization to compute projected financial
ratios under various
strategy-implementation
scenarios. When compared to
prior years and to industry
averages, financial
ratios
provide valuable insights
into the feasibility of various
strategy-implementation approaches.
A
Pro Forma Income Statement
and Balance Sheet
Prior
Projected
Remarks
Year
Year
2005
2005
PRO
FORMA
INCOME
STATEMENT
Sales
1000
1500
50%
increase
Cost
of Goods Sold
700
1050
70%
of sales
Gross
Margin
300
450
Selling
Expense
100
150
10%
of sales
Administrative
Expense
100
150
10%
of sales
Earnings
Before Interest and
Taxes
100
150
137
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
Interest
50
50
Earnings
Before Taxes
50
100
Taxes
25
50
50%
rate
Net
Income
25
50
Dividends
10
20
Retained
Earnings
15
30
PRO
FORMA
BALANCE
SHEET
Assets
Cash
5
7.75
Plug
figure
Accounts
Receivable
2
4.00
Incr.
100%
Inventory
20
45.00
Total
Current Assets
27
56.75
Land
15
15.00
Plant
and Equipment
50
80.00
Add
3 new plants at
$10
million each
Less
Depreciation
10
20.00
Net
Plant and Equipment
40
60.00
Total
Fixed Assets
55
75.00
Total
Assets
82
131.75
Liabilities
Accounts
Payable
10
10.00
Notes
Payable
10
10.00
Total
Current Liabilities
20
20.00
Long-Term
Debt
40
70.00
Borrowed
$30 million
Additional
Paid-in-Capital
20
35.00
Issued
100,000 shares
at
$150 each
Retained
Earnings
2
6.75
2
+ 4.75
Total
Liabilities and Net
Worth
82
131.75
There
are six steps in performing
pro forma financial
analysis:
1.
Prepare income statement before
balance sheet (forecast
sales)
2.
Use percentage-of-sales method to project
CGS and expenses
3.
Calculate projected net income
4.
Subtract dividends to be paid from Net
Income and add remaining to
Retained Earnings
5.
Project balance sheet times
beginning with retained
earnings
6.
List comments (remarks) on projected
statements
138
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
Financial
Budgets
"Document
that details how funds will
be obtained and spent for a
specified period of
time."
Types
of Budgets
Cash
budgets
Operating
budgets
Sales
budgets
Profit
budgets
Factory
budgets
Capital
budgets
Expense
budgets
Divisional
budgets
Variable
budgets
Flexible
budgets
Fixed
budgets
Annual
budgets are most common,
although the period of time for a budget
can range from one
day to
more
than ten years. Fundamentally, financial budgeting is
a method for specifying what must be
done
to
complete strategy implementation
successfully. Financial budgeting should not be
thought of as a
tool
for limiting expenditures
but rather as a method for
obtaining the most productive
and profitable
use
of an organization's resources. Financial
budgets can be viewed as the planned allocation of a
firm's
resources
based on forecasts of the
future.
Financial
budgets have some
limitations. First, budgetary programs
can become so detailed that
they are
cumbersome
and overly expensive. Over
budgeting or under budgeting can cause
problems. Second,
financial
budgets can become a
substitute for objectives. A budget is a
tool and not an end in
itself.
Third,
budgets can hide inefficiencies if based
solely on precedent rather than periodic
evaluation of
circumstances
and standards. Finally,
budgets are sometimes used
as instruments of tyranny that
result
in
frustration, resentment, absenteeism,
and high turnover. To minimize the effect
of this last concern,
managers
should increase the participation of
subordinates in preparing budgets.
Evaluating
the Worth of a
Business
Evaluating
the worth of a business is central to
strategy implementation because
integrative, intensive,
and
diversification strategies are
often implemented by acquiring other firms.
Other strategies, such
as
retrenchment
and divestiture, may result in the
sale of a division of an organization or of the
firm itself.
All
the various methods for determining a
business's worth can be grouped
into three main
approaches
1.
What a firm owns
2.
What a firm earns
3.
What a firm will bring in
the market.
The
first
approach in evaluating the
worth of a business is determining its
net worth or stockholders'
equity.
Net worth represents the sum
of common stock, additional paid-in
capital, and retained
earnings.
The
second
approach to
measuring the value of a firm
grows out of the belief that
the worth of any
business
should be based largely on the future
benefits its owners may derive
through net profits.
The
third
approach,
letting the market determine a
business's worth, involves
three methods.
1.
First,
base the firm's
worth on the selling price of a
similar company. A potential
problem,
however,
is that sometimes comparable
figures are not easy to
locate, even though
substantial
information
on firms that buy or sell to
other firms is available in major
libraries.
2.
The
second approach is
called the price-earnings
ratio method. To use
this method, divide the market
price
of the firm's common stock by the annual
earnings per share and
multiply this number by the
firm's
average net income for the
past five years.
3.
The
third approach can be
called the outstanding
shares method. To use
this method, simply multiply
the
number of shares outstanding by the market
price per share and
add a premium. The premium
is
simply a per share dollar
amount that a person or firm is
willing to pay to control
(acquire) the
other
company.
139
Table of Contents:
|
|||||