|
|||||
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
Lesson
10
TECHNOLOGICAL
FORCES
Revolutionary
technological forces:
Profound
impact on organizations
Internet
Semiconductors
XML
(extensible markup lang.)
technologies
UWB
(ultra wideband wireless)
communications
Revolutionary
technological changes and discoveries
such as superconductivity, computer
engineering,
thinking
computers, robotics, unemployed factories,
miracle drugs, space
communications, space
manufacturing,
lasers, cloning, satellite networks,
fiber optics, biometrics,
and electronic funds transfer
are
having
a dramatic impact on organizations.
Superconductivity advancements alone,
which increase the
power
of electrical products by lowering
resistance to current, are
revolutionizing business
operations,
especially
in the transportation, utility, health
care, electrical, and computer
industries.
The
Internet is acting as a national
and even global economic
engine that is spurring productivity, a
critical
factor
in a country's ability to improve
living standards. The
Internet is saving companies
billions of dollars
in
distribution and transaction
costs from direct sales to
self-service systems. For
example, the familiar
Hypertext
Markup Language (HTML) is being
replaced by Extensible Markup Language
(XML). XML is a
programming
language based on "tags" whereby a number
represents a price, an invoice, a date, a
zip code,
or
whatever. XML is forcing companies to
make a major strategic decision in
terms of whether to open
their
information to the world in the form of
catalogs, inventories, prices and
specifications, or attempt to
hold
their data closely to
preserve some perceived
advantage. XML is reshaping industries,
reducing prices,
accelerating
global trade, and
revolutionizing all commerce.
Microsoft has reoriented most of
its software
development
around XML, replacing
HTML.
Ultra-wideband
(UWB) wireless communications
that sends information on
tiny wave pulses may
soon
replace
continuous radio waves, allowing
ever-smaller devices to do vastly
more powerful
wireless
communications.
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) is slow to approve
UWB in fear of its
disrupting
existing wireless communication, but UWB
technology pioneered by Time Domain
of
Huntsville,
Alabama, has the potential to permanently
change the way all
individuals and
businesses
communicate
worldwide.
Internet
changes the nature of
opportunities and threats
Alters
life cycle of products
Increases
speed of distribution
Creates
new products and
services
Eases
limitations of geographic
markets
Alters
economies of scale
Changes
entry barriers
The
Internet is changing the very nature of
opportunities and threats by altering the
life cycles of
products,
increasing
the speed of distribution, creating
new products and services,
erasing limitations of
traditional
geographic
markets, and changing the historical
trade-off between production
standardization and
flexibility.
The Internet is altering economies of
scale, changing entry
barriers, and redefining
the
relationship
between industries and
various suppliers, creditors,
customers, and competitors.
Capitalizing
on Information Technology
(IT)
Chief
Information Officer
(CIO)
Chief
Technology Officer
(CTO)
To
effectively capitalize on information
technology, a number of organizations are
establishing two new
positions
in their firms: chief
information officer (CIO)
and
chief
technology officer (CTO).
This
trend reflects the
growing
importance of information
technology in
strategic management. A CIO
and CTO work together
to
ensure
that information needed to formulate,
implement, and evaluate strategies is
available where and
when
it is needed. These persons
are responsible for developing,
maintaining, and updating a
company's
information
database. The CIO is more a
manager, managing the overall
external-audit process; the CTO is
more
a technician, focusing on technical
issues such as data acquisition,
data processing, decision
support
systems,
and software and hardware
acquisition.
38
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
Technology-based
issues:
Underlie
nearly every strategic
decision
Technological
forces represent major opportunities
and threats that must be
considered in formulating
strategies.
Technological advancements dramatically
can affect organizations' products,
services, markets,
suppliers,
distributors, competitors, customers, manufacturing
processes, marketing practices,
and
competitive
position. Technological advancements
can create new markets,
result in a proliferation of
new
and
improved products, change the relative
competitive cost positions in an
industry, and render
existing
products
and services obsolete.
Technological changes can
reduce or eliminate cost barriers
between
businesses,
create shorter production runs,
create shortages in technical
skills, and result in
changing values
and
expectations of employees, managers,
and customers. Technological
advancements can create
new
competitive
advantages that
are more powerful than
existing advantages. No company or industry today
is
insulated
against emerging technological
developments. In high-tech industries
identification and evaluation
of
key technological opportunities and
threats can be the most
important part of the external
strategic-
management
audit.
Organizations
that traditionally have
limited technology expenditures to what they
can fund after
meeting
marketing
and financial requirements urgently need
a reversal in thinking. The
pace of technological change
is
increasing and literally
wiping out businesses every
day. An emerging consensus holds
that technology
management
is one of the key responsibilities of
strategists. Firms should pursue
strategies that take
advantage
of technological opportunities to achieve
sustainable, competitive advantages in
the marketplace.
Technology-based
issues will underlie nearly
every important decision
that strategists make.
Crucial to those
decisions
will be the ability to approach
technology planning analytically and
strategically. . . . Technology
can
be planned and managed using
formal techniques similar to
those used in business and
capital
investment
planning. An effective technology strategy is
built on a penetrating analysis of
technology
opportunities
and threats, and an
assessment of the relative importance of these
factors to overall corporate
strategy.
In
practice, critical decisions about technology
too often are delegated to
lower organizational levels or
are
made
without an understanding of their
strategic implications. Many strategists
spend countless hours
determining
market share, positioning products in
terms of features and price,
forecasting sales and
market
size,
and monitoring distributors; yet
too often technology does
not receive the same
respect:
The
impact of this oversight is devastating.
Firms not managing technology to
ensure their futures
may
eventually
find their futures managed by technology.
Technology's impact reaches far beyond
the "high-
tech"
companies. Although some
industries may appear to be relatively
technology-insensitive in terms of
products
and market requirements, they
are not immune from the
impact of technology; companies in
smokestack
as well as service industries
must carefully monitor emerging
technological opportunities and
threats.
Not
all sectors of the economy
are affected equally by technological
developments. The
communications,
electronics,
aeronautics, and pharmaceutical
industries are much more
volatile than the textile,
forestry, and
metals
industries. For strategists in
industries affected by rapid
technological change, identifying
and
evaluating
technological opportunities and threats
can represent the most
important part of an external
audit.
Some
technological advancements expected soon
in the computer and medical Industry
are computers that
recognize
handwriting; voice-controlled computers;
gesture-controlled computers; picture phones;
and
defeat
of heart disease, AIDS, rheumatoid
arthritis, multiple sclerosis, leukemia,
and lung cancer.
New
technological
advancements in the computer industry alone
are revolutionizing the way
businesses operate
today.
Cell phone and wireless
Internet access are becoming
common, with Finland leading
all countries in
this
new technology.
Competitive
Forces
"Collection
and evaluation of information on competitors is
essential for successful
strategy formulation"
Competition
in virtually all industries
can be described as
intense.
Identifying
rival firms:
Strengths
Weaknesses
Capabilities
Opportunities
39
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
Threats
Objectives
Strategies
Key
Questions about Competitors:
Their
strengths
Their
weaknesses
Their
objectives and
strategies
Their
responses to all external variables
(e.g. social, political,
demographic, etc.)
Their
vulnerability to our alternative
strategies
Our
vulnerability to successful strategic
counterattack Our product
and service
positioning
relative
to competitors
Entry
and exit of firms in the industry
Key
factors for our current
position in industry
Sales
and profit rankings of competitors
over time
Nature
of supplier and distributor
relationships
The
threat of substitute products or
services
The
top five U.S. competitors in
four different industries
are identified in Table. An
important part of an
external
audit is identifying rival firms
and determining their strengths,
weaknesses, capabilities,
opportunities,
threats, objectives, and
strategies.
The
Top Five U.S. Competitors in
Four Different Industries in
1999
1999
SALES
PERCENTAGE
1999
PERCENTAGE
IN
$
CHANGE
FROM PROFITS IN CHANGE
FROM
MILLIONS
1998
$
MILLIONS
1998
AEROSPACE
Boeing
57,993
+3
2,309
+106
Lockheed
25,530
-3
737
-26
Martin
United
24,127
+6
841
-27
Technologies
Northrop
8,995
+1
483
+149
Grumman
General
8,959
+21
880
+49
Dynamics
FOREST
PRODUCTS
International
24,600
+3
199
-19
Paper
Georgia-
17,790
+35
716
+545
Pacific
Kimberly-
13,006
+6
1,668
+50
Clark
Boise
6,952
+13
200
NM
Cascade
Fort
James
6,827
+0
350
-29
40
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
IBM
87,548
+7
7,712
+22
Hewlett-
43,808
+10
3,016
+8
Packard
Compaq
38,525
+24
569
NM
Computer
Dell
25,265
+38
1,666
+14
Computer
Xerox
19,228
-1
1,424
+143
PUBLISHING
Time
Warner 27,333
+87
1,960
+1067
CBS
7,373
+8
157
NM
Gannett
5,260
+8
919
-5
McGraw-Hill
3,992
+7
426
+25
Knight-
3,228
+4
40
+11
Source:
Adapted
from Corporate Scoreboard, Business
Week (March
27, 2000): 167-192.
NM:
Not Measurable
Collecting
and evaluating information on competitors is
essential for successful
strategy formulation.
Identifying
major competitors is not always easy
because many firms have divisions
that compete in
different
industries. Most multidivisional firms
generally do not provide
sales and profit information
on a
divisional
basis for competitive
reasons. Also, privately held firms do
not publish any financial or
marketing
information.
Despite
the problems mentioned above, information
on leading competitors in particular industries
can be
found
in publications such as Moody's
Manuals, Standard Corporation
Descriptions, Value Line
Investment Surveys,
Ward's
Business Directory, Dun's
Business Rankings, Standard &
Poor's Industry Surveys,
Industry Week,
Forbes,
Fortune,
Business Week, and
Inc.
However,
many businesses use the
Internet to obtain most of
their information on competitors.
The
Internet
is fast, thorough, accurate,
and increasingly indispensable in this
regard. Questions
about
competitors
such as those presented in
Table are important to
address in performing an external
audit.
Key
Questions About Competitors
1.
What
are the major competitors'
strengths?
2.
What
are the major competitors'
weaknesses?
3.
What
are the major competitors' objectives and
strategies?
4.
How
will the major competitors most likely
respond to current economic,
social,
cultural,
demographic, environmental, political, governmental,
legal, technological,
and
competitive trends affecting our
industry?
5.
How
vulnerable are the major competitors to our
alternative company strategies?
6.
How
vulnerable are our alternative strategies
to successful counterattack by
our
major
competitors?
7.
How
are our products or services
positioned relative to major
competitors?
8.
To
what extent are new firms entering and
old firms leaving this industry?
9.
What
key factors have resulted in
our present competitive
position in this Industry?
10.
How
have the sales and profit
rankings of major competitors in the industry
changed
41
Strategic
Management MGT603
VU
over
recent years? Why have these
rankings changed that
way?
11.
What is the nature of supplier and
distributor relationships in this
industry?
12.
To what extent could substitute products or services
be a threat to competitors in
this
industry?
Competition
in virtually all industries
can be described as intense
and sometimes cutthroat. For
example,
when
United Parcel Service (UPS)
employees were on strike in 1997,
competitors such as Federal
Express,
Greyhound,
Roadway, and United Airlines
lowered prices, doubled advertising
efforts, and locked
new
customers
into annual contracts in
efforts to leave UPS
customer-less when the strike ended. If a
firm
detects
weakness in a competitor, no mercy at all
is shown in capitalizing on its
problems.
Seven
characteristics describe the
most competitive companies in
America:
1)
Market share matters; the
90th share point isn't as
important as the 91st, and
nothing is more
dangerous
than
falling to 89;
2)
Understand and remember precisely what
business you are
in;
3)
Whether it's broke or not,
fix it--make it better; not
just products, but the whole
company if necessary;
4)
Innovate or evaporate; particularly in
technology-driven businesses, nothing
quite recedes like
success;
5)
Acquisition is essential to growth; the
most successful purchases
are in niches that add a
technology or
a
related market;
6)
People make a difference; tired of
hearing it? Too
bad;
7)
There is no substitute for quality
and no greater threat than failing to be
cost-competitive on a global
basis;
these are complementary
concepts, not mutually
exclusive ones.
8)
Competitive
Intelligence Programs
Systematic
and ethical process for
gathering and analyzing
information about the competition's
activities and general
business
trends
to further a business' own
goals.
Every
organization must have an intelligence
programmed. It should be ethical and
systematic for gathering
and
analyzing the information about
competitor activities and activities
involve in general
business.
42
Table of Contents:
|
|||||