|
|||||
![]() SME
Management (MGT-601)
VU
Lesson
38
EXPORT
POTENTIAL OF SME IN
DEVELOPING
Countries.
II
Relationship
between SMEs and Export
Development
While
in certain circumstances SMEs
enjoys some advantages of
flexibility, in general they suffer
from
structural
handicaps in their operations arising
from small size, particularly
where exports are
concerned.
Even
SMEs that are highly
successful domestically, for a variety of
reasons, do not find it easy
to upgrade
production
to production for
exports.
Problems
faced
by SMEs in developing countries
typically include:
·
Scarcity of capital.
·
Limited and unequal access
to institutional credit markets.
·
Irregular access to domestic
and imported inputs coupled with higher
cost.
·
Inadequate infrastructure facilities.
·
Weak managerial and
technical skills.
A
large number of SMEs have
successfully overcome these
formidable difficulties, established a
sound base
in
the domestic market, and may
be potentially capable of breaking into
export markets. However they
may
be
hampered by a variety of
circumstances:
·
Lack of information on possible
export market.
·
Absence of guidance on export
regulations and
procedures.
·
Inability to identify sources of
assistance for product development
and product upgrading for
export.
·
Lack of information on export credit
and insurance facilities as well as
for export
requirements.
·
Lack of information on operation of
indirect marketing channels like
merchant export
houses.
·
Absence of guidance on basic
management issues relevant exporting
firms.
·
Absence of sound steps that
need to be taken to enter in
export field.
SMEs
are often uninterested and
unprepared to enter export
field owing to lack of
market information,
Lack
of incentives, Lack of credit, Lack of staff and
organization and Difficulties in
obtaining export
licenses,
export guarantees and
foreign exchange. Thus,
while in many developing
countries SMEs are
now
receiving
greater attention and aid
from both the public and the
private sector in many
developing
countries,
little attention has so far
been focused on the specific
help needed to increase exports
from
SMEs.
Developing
the export capabilities of SMEs is
difficult because of their
special problems. Yet it is
often
assumed
that the needs of SMEs are
adequately net by `traditional sources'
of assistance, which are
usually
geared
to the needs of larger firms. While
most developing countries
have well-established SME
support
programs
with agencies. Yet it can be
argued that many of the
techniques used to stimulate
and support
small
business growth in general
can be extended activity of
SMEs.
This
argument is based on the fact
that the development of export capability in
small firms is just one
more
aspect
of their business development. In the
essence, exporting means
moving to improve
basic
organizational
capabilities such as management
control, financing, costing and
pricing, design and
marketing
management.
General support structure for
SME development has to be linked
with export support. This
structure
demonstrates the linkage between the
general support infrastructure for
SMEs and the specific
export
support infrastructure and their
different goals.
The
former has as its objective the
development of capability of SMEs for survival
and growth, the
latter
the
development of specific capability for
export.
Whereas
in the context of the firm the development of
general organizational capability and
that of specific
organizational
capability for export are
obviously closely linked,
casual observation indicates that
there is
often
no close linkage between the general
support infrastructure for SMEs
and the export
support
infrastructure.
102
![]() SME
Management (MGT-601)
VU
SMEs
assistance institutions can be
considered in terms of a number of
characteristics including: Whether
they
are public, private or mixed.
Whether they are local, regional or
national. And their degree of
coverage.
Whether
they provide integrated forms of assistance,
meeting a variety of different kinds of
needs; whether
they
are general or concentrated
upon particular industry sectors or
sectors of the population; whether
they
are
strong in terms of resources and
capability; and finally whether they are
long established
traditional
sources
of small business support
with a good track
record.
Strategy
for Development of Exports from
SMEs
Today,
export promotion in general by
most of the developing countries
and particularly by SMEs is
not
easy.
This is true for a variety of
reasons. Some of which are
listed below.
First,
the products
available in most developing
countries are generally
known in international markets
and
discovery
new product capabilities is
not likely to be as regular
and frequent as before.
Second,
international marketing techniques are
well disseminated in
most
developing
countries, though they are
not equally well known in
the interior of the
Countries.
Third, as
more developing countries
penetrate in world markets,
path to other developing
countries will be
that
much harder and competition
correspondingly greater.
Finally,
international markets are
tending to become less open to
manufactured products from
developing
countries.
Common
Difficulties at Various
Levels
A
summary of some of these
problems is given below.
At
the national
level.
·
It is often observed that a well-planned
strategy to develop exports from SMEs
does not exist.
The
objectives
are frequently not well
defined and the available
policy instruments for industry
and trade are
frequently
not aimed at developing the
SME sector and its
exports.
·
Where support for SMEs is a
stated objective, there is often
inadequate follow-up in terms of
specific
measures
and mechanisms. In many
instances, the institutional infrastructure is
sub-optimal with a lack of
coordination
among trade service
institutions.
·
The environment is often not
conducive to the creation and growth of
marketing channels for
SME
exports
such as merchant export
houses, export development companies,
joint marketing arrangements,
export
consortia, etc.
At
the level of trade organization
(TPOs) and industry export
institutions
·
There is often an inadequate focus on
issues of concern and
relevance to SMEs and a lack
of appreciation
of
the special features and
difficulties of SMEs in their
export efforts.
·
Many service institutions do
not have well-defined
programs with clear
objectives for assisting
SMEs in
export
development.
·
The channels of communication between
service institutions and
SMEs are frequently
inadequate.
At
the level of
Enterprise
·
In many situations, special
difficulties are encountered,
leading to inadequate and
more costly access to
factor
markets.
·
Individual SMEs are often
not in a position to identify
sources of assistance for
product development and
product
upgrading for export.
·
SMEs generally have
difficulty in obtaining information
and guidance on export
markets and are unable
to
undertake
direct export marketing.
103
![]() SME
Management (MGT-601)
VU
·
Absence of indirect export marketing
channels like merchant
export houses, export
development
companies,
etc. in many situations
inhibit export market access
for SMEs.
·
Training facilities in export management
are often not readily
available.
Involving
SME Development
agencies
The
trade organizations and
export service agencies in
many developing countries interface
only with
exporting
SMEs, though the majority of the
SMEs are usually linked
with national level with
SME
development
agencies and institution.
Many governments have
established a network of SME
institutions
which
are in close touch with
SMEs.
There
is a need to deliver an export
orientation programme to a new
target audience, that is,
established
SMEs
in the region who are currently not
participating in exports.
It
is important to create awareness in
SME development institutions and
through them among the
enterprises
themselves of export potential
for export. To achieve this,
it will be necessary to
strengthen
SME
development institutions capacities to
provide export development
services.
GENERAL
AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN SERVICES
(GATS)
Pakistan
has participated in GATS negotiations,
but did not undertake
extensive commitments.
Pakistan
signed
the second protocol to the GATS
that pertains to financial
services, which apply to
insurance,
banking
and other financial services.
Pakistan also provided offers in the
negotiations on Basic
Telecommunication
which were completed on
February 15, 1997.
Pakistan's
schedule of specific commitments
consists of both;
·
Sector-specific
commitments
·
Horizontal
commitments.
Sector-
Specific Commitments
The
Sector- Specific Commitments
cover 47 activities within the
business, communications,
construction/engineering,
health, financial and tourism/travel
services.
The
GATS agreement recognizes 12
main sectors for the purpose
of classification of services are
as
follows.
1.
Communication.
2.
Financial.
3.
Construction/Engineering.
4.
Health.
5.
Tourism/travel.
6.
Distribution.
7.
Education.
8.
Environment.
9.
Recreation/culture.
10.
Sporting.
11.
Transport.
12.
Others.
Pakistan
has so far made commitments
in only first six of above
mentioned twelve sectors which
are
business
services, financial services,
communication services, health and
related services, construction
and
related
engineering services and tourism
and travel related
services.
104
![]() SME
Management (MGT-601)
VU
Pakistan
also submitted two lists of MFN
Exemptions, One relating to telecommunications on
April 11,
1997
and the Second relating to banking
and other financial services on
February 26 1998.Under Article II
of
GATS, Pakistan maintains MFN
exemptions for four financial
services/activities with a view
to
presenting
reciprocal requirements, for
four financial services/activities with a
view to presenting
reciprocal
requirements.
Islamic financing transactions and
join ventures among ECO
countries.
Pakistan
also maintains exemptions in
two identical communication services in favours
of
countries/operators
signatories of bilateral agreements on
rtes with the PTCL. It may
be mentioned that the
maintenance
of Article II exemption is not
unusual: 79 member countries
have maintained 390 MFN
exemptions.
However, such exemptions should
not exceed a period of ten
years (beginning from1995). In
any
event, they shall be subject to
negotiation in subsequent trade
liberalization.
The
activity or Industry-Specific
Commitments have
been made under;
·
Article
XVI (Market Access).
·
Article
XVII (National Treatment).
Of
the GATS, MFN exemptions on the other
hand originate from Article II of the
GATS.
Horizontal
Commitments of Pakistan
The
Horizontal Commitments of Pakistan,
that is, commitments that
apply to all sectors, relate
to
"commercial
presence" or "presence of natural person".
Pakistan's commitments regarding
"commercial
presence"
are subject to incorporation in
Pakistan with maximum
foreign equity of 51% unless
different
percentage
is inscribed against a particular sector
or sub-sector. All expenses of
representative offices have
to
meet by foreign remittances. A
Foreign undertaking is allowed to hire up to 50% of
its total executive
and
specialist from
abroad.
Acquisition
of real estate by non-Pakistani entities
and/or persons is subject to
authorization on a case by
case
basis taking into consideration the
purposes and location of the
undertaking.
A
study on Trade in Services
commissioned by Ministry of Commerce,
Government of Pakistan
(March
2003)
brought forth following
important points;
Pakistan
like a large majority of
countries was rather cautious in
its approach to GATS
commitments.
This was only natural. But
what was unique to Pakistan was
that while it had
paid
a great deal of attention to
inward flow of foreign investment
and technology it did
not
view the GATS as a mean of expanding
export of its services. The
central lesson of
this
Study is that Pakistan should
increase the range of its
objectives from
inward
investment
and importation of foreign technology to
the expansion of its exports.
In
future
its objective should be attraction of
foreign investment, increase in
importation of
modern
technology, and promotion of exports of
services.
105
Table of Contents:
|
|||||