|
|||||
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
Lecture
30
TEAM
DECISION MAKING
Discussion on
decision making process was
started in previous lecture/chapter. We
tried to understand
various
aspects of decision making
including the process of decision
making, types of decision
making
etc.
In this lecture we will try
to apply that process of
decision making and also to understand
the team
decision
making.
Apply
decision making steps to the
following situation.
"You
want to buy a
car"
To
make a better decision
following step will be taken
and few question might need
to be answered.
o
What
is your situation?
o
SITUATION:
You
want or need a car.
o
CHOICES:
What
are your choices?
o
CHOICES:
Buy
the car. Don't buy
the car
o
CONSEQUENCES
- YES You must
spend your money for -
Car Cost
On
Insurance, on General Maintenance
and
Gas/Petrol Charges
o
CONSEQUENCES
-
if
YES
How
will you pay for the
car? -
You
may have to work to pay for
the car.
You
may think about buying
through Leasing etc.
o
CONSEQUENCES
- if YES
How
will your Study be
affected?
You
will have less time to
study
o
CONSEQUENCES
if YES
How
will your leisure and social
time be affected?
You
will have less leisure and
social time.
o
CONSEQUENCES
- NO
a.
You will be able to save more
money to buy a better
car.
b.
You will have more money to spend on
clothes, buy computer,
motor-bike
and fun.
c.
You will have more leisure
time.
o
DECISION
a.
YES or
b.
No
o
DECISION
Which
decision would you
make?
It
depends on situation and
priority of each individual.
The consequence of each
decision could be
different.
Remember, some decisions will be good and
some decisions will be bad. But
you will learn
something
from every decision you
make!!!
Team
Decision Making:
Use
Individual Decision Making
When:
o
You
have the information to make a good
decision
o
The
situation is urgent
o
Subordinates
are already committed or
their commitment doesn't
matter
Use
Team/Group For Decision
Making When:
o
No one
knows the answer or the expertise is in the
group
o
You
want to increase the commitment of
subordinates
o
The
situation is not
urgent
in the sense that it requires an
immediate response
o
You,
as manager/leader, can live with
choice
126
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
Group/Team
Decision Making
Advantages
Disadvantages
The
process takes longer, so it is
more
More
information & knowledge
are
o
o
costly
Available
Compromise
decisions due to
More
alternatives are likely to
be
o
o
indecisiveness
may emerge
generated.
One
person may dominate the
group
More
acceptance of the final decision is
o
o
Groupthink
may occur
likely
Enhanced
communication of the decision
o
may
result better decisions
Methods
of Group/Team Decision Making
(Johnson & Johnson,
1991)
o
Decision
by authority without
discussion
o
Expert
member
o
Average
of member's opinions
o
Decision
by authority after
discussion
o
Majority
control
o
Minority
control
o
Consensus
Decisions
made in groups can be made
by one of four main
methods.
o
Unilaterally
by an individual
o
By
simple majority vote
o
By
consensus everyone agreeing to
support the conclusion
o
Subgroup
of team
Which
one is the best? There is no "best".
Different types fit best for
different situations.
Unilateral
approach has one person
make the decision for
the whole group.
Pros
Cons
Some
people might not
understand
Enables
you to move fast.
o
o
rationale
for decision
Takes
care of the small
stuff.
o
Decision
maker may make
decision
Works
well in emergencies
o
o
with
inadequate info
Works
well when one person has
all
o
Generates
less support for the
decision
relevant
information and is trusted
o
127
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
Simple
majority voting works when
you don't have time
for consensus
building.
Pros
Cons
Breeds
winners v. losers
climate
Easy
to use
o
o
Lessens
creativity and flexibility
since
Works
when everyone has the
same
o
o
difficult
to consider many
options.
information
and already understands
others
Sometimes
it artificially limits
choices.
Implementation
can be handled by
majority
o
Helps
in managing large groups
o
Consensus
means everyone supports
a decision.
It does not mean unanimity or
that everyone
gets
what
they want.
Pros
Cons
o
Good
for very important
decisions
o
Takes
the longest
o
Builds
strongest buy-in
o
Requires
highest level of
communication
o
Make
for quickest
implementation
skills
o
Develops
a group's problem solving
skills
Subgroup
of a team is appropriate under the
following circumstances.
Pros
Cons
Appropriate
when subgroup is only
entity
o
When
"pros" do not apply, this
can result
o
affected
in
conflict and dissent regarding
decision
Decision
can be implemented
w/o
o
made
by group
involvement
of majority
Whole
group is comfortable
with
o
delegating
authority
Relationship
between type of decision and
quality.
Team
Problem Solving Techniques:
Consensus
presenting
opinions and gaining agreement to support
a decision. A proposal that
is
o
acceptable
enough that all members
are willing to support it.
How can you reach a
true consensus?
o
Identify
all options and views
o
Build
on common ideas
o
Discuss
the differences
o
Propose
alternatives or compromises to settle
differences
o
Test
consensus when you seem to
have a conclusion by "doing a check". Go
around room
and
have everyone given their
current opinion.
o
If
consensus is not reached,
repeat steps 1 5.
Brainstorming
process to generate a quantity of
ideas. In this
technique the goal is. Goal -
to
o
examine
as broad a range of options as
possible
o
Rules
- Encourage free-wheeling - No discussion - No
judgment - Write visibly all
ideas
o
Sequence
o
Review
the topic (as a
question)
o
Minute
or two of silence to think
o
Call
out and write down
ideas
Nominal
Group Technique process to generate
ideas and evaluate
solutions.
o
o
A
form of structured group decision
making that enables everyone
to participate and have
his/her
ideas heard without hostile
criticism or distortions.
o
A
structured voting procedure is used to
prioritize responses to the nominal
question.
Stepladder
Technique
o
128
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
o
A
decision making approach in which
members are added one by one to a
team.
o
Two
people starts a discussion of the
task.
o
Another
member is added and then
presents their ideas to the
group.
o
Then
another and so on until decision is
made.
Delphi
Technique process to generate ideas
from physically dispersed
experts.
o
o
Used
in situations where group members
are unable to meet face to
face.
o
The
process.
A
series of questions is distributed to a
panel.
Panel
members submit their
responses to a decision
coordinator.
The
decision coordinator summarizes
the responses, and sends the
summary along
with
a follow-up questionnaire to the
panel.
Panel
members send in their
responses.
The
process is repeated until a
consensus is reached.
Quality
circles (QC): a small
group of employees who work
voluntarily on company time,
o
typically
one hour per week, to address
work-related problems
Quality
team: a team
that is part of an organization's
structure & is empowered to act on
o
its
decisions regarding product & quality
service
Concept
of QC
The
philosophy behind the concept of QC is
that responsibility of generating
quality is
vested
in the minds of all job related
people instead of a few supervisor or
inspectors. They
o
Identify
problems
o
Collect
and analyze data
o
Make
cause-effect relationships,
o
Generate
best solutions
o
Computer-Aided
Decision Making
o
Expert
Systems: a programmed
decision tool set up using
decision rules
o
Decision
Support Systems: computer and
communication systems that
process in coming
data
and synthesize pertinent information
for managers to use
o
Group
Decision Support Systems:
systems
that use computer software
and
communication
facilities to support group
decision-making processes in either
face-to-face
meetings
or dispersed meetings
Computer-mediated
decision making. It is done through the
electronic brainstorming through the
use of
special
software and personal computers. The
nominal group and Delphi
techniques lend themselves to
computer
mediation
Potential
Advantages of Group/Team Decision
Making:
o
More
knowledge and expertise is applied to
solve the problem.
o
A
greater number of alternatives are
examined.
o
The
final decision is better understood
and accepted by all
group/team members.
o
More
commitment among all group/team
members to make the final
decision work.
Potential
Disadvantages of Group/ Teams
Decision Making:
o
Individuals
may feel compelled to
conform to the apparent wishes of the
group/team.
o
The
group's/team's decision may be
dominated by one individual or a small
coalition.
o
Group/team
decisions usually take longer to
make.
Improving
Team Decision
Making
o
Assign
the devil's advocate role
o
Be
open to dissenting points of
view
o
Seek
outside opinions
o
Break
up into smaller groups
o
Rethink
issues before making final
decision
o
Use
brainstorming
129
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
Managing
Group and Team
Decision-Making Processes
Have
each group member
individually
Be
aware of the pros and cons
of
o
o
and
critically evaluate all
alternatives.
having
a group or team make a
As
a manager, do not make your
decision.
o
position
known too early.
Set
deadlines for when decisions
must
o
Appoint
a group member to be a
be
made.
o
"devil's
advocate."
Avoid
problems with dominance by
o
managing
group membership.
Hold
a follow-up meeting to
recheck
o
the
decision.
130
Table of Contents:
|
|||||