|
|||||
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
Lesson
18
UNDERSTANDING
POWER
We
started discussing concept of
power and try to differentiate
power, influence and
authority.
Power
-
the ability to influence another
person
Influence
-
the process of affecting the
thoughts, behavior, & feelings of
another person
Authority
-
the right to influence another person.
Legitimate power is known as
authority.
Sources
of Power:
Organizations
are composed of people who
come together to achieve their common
goals. When
resources
are scarce, people and groups have to
compete for them, and some achieve
their goals while
others
do not. In an organization, leaders have
the primary responsibility to ensure
that competition for
resources
is free and fair and that
people who obtain power
over resources do so because
they possess
skills
and abilities that will, in the
long run, benefit all
members of the organization. Similarly
leaders
also
use different sources of
power to influence followers and get
things from them.
Sources
of Power
1.
Reward
power
Other
Sources of Power
-
giving something of
value.
2.
Coercive
power (Punishment)
·
Connection power
-
force against the will
(threat of firing).
·
Information power
3.
Expert
power
-
use of knowledge, competence,
expertise.
·
Group decision making
power
4.
Referent
power
·
Organization power
-
use of charisma to influence
others (inspiration)
5.
Legitimate
power
·
Coalition power
-
position power.
6.
Numbers
power
7.
Others-
legal,
public, money
1.
Reward power: When
someone has power to give
some thing of value or
withhold this. Reward
power
is the power to give pay
raises, promotions, praise, interesting
projects, and other rewards to
subordinates.
As long as subordinates value the rewards, a
manager/leader can use reward
power to
influence
and control their
behavior.
2.
Coercive power (Punishment): Coercive
power is the power to give or
withhold punishment.
Punishments
range from suspension to demotion,
termination, unpleasant job assignments,
or even the
withholding
of praise and goodwill. The
ability to reward or punish subordinates
gives supervisors great
power,
which is sometimes abused. It is
for this reason that
most organizations have clearly
defined
rules
concerning when and how
employees are to be rewarded or punished. Review
boards and
promotion
committees may be used to assist
management in this
respect.
Coercive
power and reward power are
actually counterparts of each other. If
you can remove something
of
positive value from another or
inflict something of negative value
upon him/her, you have
coercive
power
over that person. If you
can give someone something
of positive value or remove something
of
negative
value, you have reward power
over that person.
3.
Expert
power: Expert
power is "influence wielded as a
result of expertise, special skill,
or
knowledge."
Expertise has become a
powerful source of influence as the
world has become more
technological.
As jobs become more specialized, we
become increasingly dependent on experts
to
achieve
goals. Generally, people who
possess expert power are
promoted up the hierarchy of
authority
so
that their informal power
eventually becomes
formal.
4.
Referent power: Its
base is identification with a
person who has desirable
resources or personal
traits.
If I admire and identify with
you, you can exercise
power over me because I want
to please you.
58
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
Referent
power develops out of admiration of
another and a desire to be like that
person; it is a lot like
charisma.
These individuals are often
noted for their
agreeableness, extroversion, or
conscientiousness.
Fame
is one sign that a person
has acquired referent
power.
5.
Legitimate
power: In formal
groups and organizations, the most
frequent access power is
one's
structural
position. It represents the power a
person receives as a result of
his/her position in the
formal
hierarchy.
Positions of authority include coercive
and reward powers. Legitimate power,
however, is
broader
than the power to coerce and
reward. It includes acceptance of the
authority of a position by
members
of an organization. Legitimate power
confers on an individual the legitimate
authority to
control
and use organizational resources to
accomplish organizational goals. Legitimate
power is the
ultimate
source of an individual's power in an
organization.
6.
Numbers
power: The
formal and informal power
using by an individual same
time. Especially when
number
maters. More people are on
your side, you can use
this to influence.
7.
Others:
other
powers are the legal power
uses according to the law,
public power given by the
public
to
an individual as leader and money
power based on financial
resources and influences
others with the
power
of money.
Other
Sources of Power:
·
Connection
power: connection
power is the power based on
good connection inside and
out side
the
organization. And by using
this power a leader can have achieve the
organizational goals.
·
Information
power:
Information power is power stemming
from access to and control
over
information.
The more information a manager
possesses, the better able he or
she is to solve
problems
facing subordinates. Lack of information
power forces subordinates to be dependant
on
superiors
for their information needs.
Many managers are unwilling
to share information
power.
The
most effective organizations do
not do this.
·
Group
decision making power: is
a power in which leaders
make decision in the group
and
influence
the group members.
·
Organization
power: Leaders in
particular functions or divisions
can take advantage of
other
sources
of power to enhance their
individual power. A division or
function becomes powerful
when
the
tasks that it performs give it the
ability to control the behavior of
other divisions or functions,
to
make
them depend on it, and thereby
increase its share of
organizational resources. The
power of a
function
or division also stems from
its importance, or centrality, to the
organization. (a. How
central
it is to the organization's operations and the
degree to which it lies at the
center of
information
flows. (b. These functions
or divisions have access to a lot of
information, which
gives
them
power.
·
Coalition
power: Those
"out of power" and seeking to be "in"
will first try to increase
their power
individually.
If ineffective, the alternative is to
form a coalition--an informal
group bound together
by
the active pursuit of a single
issue. Predictions about
Coalition Formation. First,
coalitions in
organizations
often seek to maximize their
size. Another prediction
relates to the degree of
interdependence
within the organization. Finally,
coalition formation will be
influenced by the
actual
tasks that workers
do.
Responses
to the Use of Power
Responses
of the use of power can be
divided into three different
behaviors. If positional power is
used
appropriately
the response of followers will be
compliance. While excessive
power use can
create
resistance
behavior. In case some one is
using personal power the response is
always commitment of
followers.
Same can be understood from the
following figure.
The
more you will move toward
excessive or coercive power the more
you can experience
resistance.
59
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
Using
Power:
Knowing
the persons who matter in your
sphere of influence
Knowing
who holds power
Using
power appropriately to build
consensus
Using
Power Appropriately
Avoidance
of power plays
Using
Power Ethically: There
are some questions that a leader
should be asking to
him
Does
the behavior produce a good outcome for
people both inside and
outside the organization?
Does
the behavior respect the rights of
all parties?
Does
the behavior treat all parties equitably
and fairly?
Three
ethical decision criteria
are utilitarianism, rights, and
justice. The first question
you need to
answer
addresses self-interest versus
organizational goals. Ethical actions are
consistent with the
organization's
goals.
The
second question concerns the
rights of other parties. The
final question that needs to
be addressed
relates
to whether or not the political
activity conforms to standards of equity
and justice.
Unfortunately,
the answers to these questions are
often argued in ways to make unethical
practices
seem
ethical. Powerful people can
become very good at
explaining self-serving behaviors.
They can
persuasively
argue that unfair actions are
really fair and just.
Negative
Consequences and Power
Abraham
Lincoln once said: "Nearly
everyone can stand
adversity, but if you want
to test a person's
true
character, give him power".
Historian Lord Acton once
said, "Power corrupts, and absolute
power
corrupts
absolutely."
How
do you get power?
Key
words:- Management,
People, Motivation, Organization, Team,
Culture, Influence, Politics
etc.
Influencing:
The
process of affecting other's
attitudes and behavior to achieve an
objective. Leadership
focuses
on the downward influence on
their followers. Power does
not minimize the importance
of
lateral
and upward influence patterns.
Types
of Influence Tactics:
·
Rational
persuasion
·
Consultation
·
Personal
appeals
·
Coalition
tactics
·
Legitimizing
tactics
·
Pressure
tactics
·
Inspirational
appeals
Outcomes
of Influence
Same
way as in case of power, the more
you will move toward
excessive or coercive influencing
tactics
or
use of power the more you
can experience resistance.
Politics:
Activities
to acquire, develop, and use
power and other resources to
obtain desired future
outcomes
when there is uncertainty or disagreement
about choices. Or
"Those
activities that are
not
required
as part of one's formal role
in the organization, but that
influence, or attempt to influence,
the
distribution
of advantages and disadvantages within
the organization." This
definition encompasses
key
elements.
60
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
Political
behavior is outside one's specified
job requirements.
It
encompasses efforts to influence the
goals, criteria, or processes used
for decision making.
It
includes such varied
political behaviors as withholding
key information from
decision makers,
whistle
blowing, spreading rumors, leaking
confidential information,
etc.
We
can also say that
Politics is the art of Influencing the
Allocation of Scarce Resources.
Politics;
Is
an interpersonal endeavor
Is
a collective activity
Requires
analysis and planning
Involves
image
The
Reality of Politics: Politics is
a fact of life in organizations.
Organizations are made up
of
individuals
and groups with different values, goals, and
interests. This sets up the potential
for conflict
over
resources. Resources in organizations
are also limited, which
often turns potential conflict
into real
conflict.
Because resources are
limited, not everyone's
interests can be provided
for causing the
conflict.
Gains
by one individual or group are
often perceived as being at the
expense of others.
These
forces create a
competition.
The
most important factor
leading to politics within
organizations is the realization that
most of the
"facts"
that are used to allocate
the limited resources are open to
interpretation.
What
is good performance?
What's
an adequate improvement?
Most
managerial decisions take place in the
large and ambiguous middle ground of
organizational
life.
Because
most decisions have to be made in a
climate of ambiguity, people
within organizations
will
use
whatever influence they can
to taint the facts to support their goals
and interests. These are
activities
we call politicking.
It
is possible for an organization to be
politics free, if all
members of that organization
hold the
same
goals and interests, however, that is not
the organization most people
work in.
Political
Tactics:
Attacking
or blaming others
Using
information as a political
tool
Creating
a favorable image (impression
management)
Developing
a base of support
Praising
others (ingratiation)
Forming
political coalitions with strong
allies
Associating
with influential
people
Creating
obligations (reciprocity)
Organizational
Factors Which Contribute to Political
Behavior
Role
ambiguity
Low
trust
Self-serving
senior managers
Democratic
decision making
Unclear
evaluation systems
High
performance pressures
Zero-sum
allocations
Scarcity
of resources
Factors
Contributing to Political
Behavior
·
Organizational
Factors
Political
activity is probably more a function of
the organization's characteristics
than of
o
individual
difference variables.
When
an organization's resources are
declining, when the existing
pattern of resources is
o
changing,
and when there is opportunity for
promotions, politics is more likely to
surface.
61
Leadership
& Team Management MGMT
623
VU
o
Cultures
characterized by low trust, role
ambiguity, unclear performance
evaluation
systems,
zero-sum reward allocation
practices, democratic decision making,
high pressures
for
performance, and self-serving senior managers
will create breeding grounds
for
politicking.
o
When
organizations downsize to improve
efficiency, people may
engage in political actions
to
safeguard what they
have.
o
Promotion
decisions have consistently been found to
be one of the most political in
organizations.
o
The
less trust there is within the
organization, the higher the level of
political behavior and
the
more likely it will be
illegitimate.
o
Role
ambiguity means that the prescribed
behaviors of the employee are
not clear.
o
There
are fewer limits to the
scope and functions of the employee's
political actions.
o
The
greater the role ambiguity, the more one
can engage in political
activity with little
chance
of it being visible.
o
Subjective
criteria in the appraisal process
o
Subjective
performance criteria create
ambiguity.
o
Single
outcome measures encourage doing
whatever is necessary to "look
good."
o
The
more time that elapses between an
action and its appraisal, the more
unlikely that the
employee
will be held accountable for
his/her political
behaviors.
o
The
zero-sum approach treats the reward
"pie" as fixed so that any
gain one person or
group
achieves has to come at the
expense of another person or group. If I
win, you must
lose!
o
This
encourages making others
look bad and increasing the visibility of
what you do.
o
Making
organizations less autocratic by
asking managers to behave more
democratically is
not
necessarily embraced by all individual
managers.
o
Sharing
their power with others
runs directly against some managers'
desires.
o
The
more pressure that employees feel to
perform well, the more likely
they are to engage
in
politicking.
o
If a
person perceives that his or her
entire career is riding on the
next "whatever," there is
motivation
to do whatever is necessary to make
sure the outcome is
favorable.
o
When
employees see top management successfully
engaging in political behavior,
a
climate
is created that supports
politicking.
Managing
Organizational Politics
Reduce
System Uncertainty
Reduce
Competition
Break
Existing Political
Fiefdoms
The
exercise of power is an essential
ingredient of organizational life, so it
is important for an
organization
to manage organizational politics and
harness it to support organizational interests.
The
management
of organizational politics falls
primarily on the CEO/leader. If the CEO/leader
is
perceived
of as being weak, other top
managers will lobby for
their own interests and
compete among
themselves
for control of resources. To
avoid power struggles, an organization
must have a strong
CEO
who can balance and
manipulate the power structure. When
there is a balance of power, the
decisions
that result from the
political process are more
likely to favor the long-term
interests of the
organization.
Managing
Political Behavior:
Maintain
open communication
Clarify
performance expectations
Use
participative management
Encourage
cooperation among work groups
Manage
scarce resources well
Provide
a supportive organizational
climate
62
Table of Contents:
|
|||||