|
|||||
Introduction
To Public
AdministrationMGT111
VU
LESSON
41
DEVOLUTION
PLAN II
In this
lecture we will examine the
reasons
for devolution, the
Devolution
plan and its
purpose
and
the areas where devolution
has occurred.
Devolution
In
the last lecture it was mentioned
that devolution is based on the
separation of the executive
from
the
judiciary, and Article 37
(i) required government to decentralize
its operations so as to bring these
closer
to
the public. The changes included the
doing away with the existing
three levels of
de-concentrated
provincial
administration (divisions, districts and
tehsils). It meant it was
felt that there was
need to separate
the
three branches of government (i.e.
judiciary, executive and
legislature).
As
we know that the 1973 Constitutions
contains Federal and Concurrent
List which
centralizes
revenue
responsibilities by bringing the sales tax under
federal control, and the
list takes many of the
other
responsibilities
of provincial government. This centralizes the
functions and revenue generation
capacity of
provinces.
There is thus a significant mismatch
between expenditure responsibility and
revenue generation
capacity
of the lower tiers of government, and the
provinces in aggregate depend on
federal transfers for
over
78 percent of their revenues.
When they depend for
revenues from the Federal
Government they have
little
freedom to plan their own
projects.
What
Does Devolution Do To The Local
State?
Local
government as we know is the lowest level or
district government. Within districts
there are
tehsil
and in a tehsil are union
councils. As we have learnt that
Constitution although has
provision for
separation
of powers, yet it centralizes
power. Devolution Plan 2000
creates local institutions
and empowers
these
institutions to design development
schemes. This is done by creating
local governments. In
100
districts
there are now 6,458
new local governments and 4
city districts; 306 tehsil municipal
administrations
and
29 city towns; and 6,022
union administrations. Under the
Devolution Plan there are
political reforms,
financial
reforms and administrative reforms.
Political Reforms had held
elections of 126,462 new
union
councilors.
Aim
of Devolution Plan
It
would be pertinent to outline the
aim of Devolution Plan 2000.
There are three broad aims
of
Devolution
Plan. These are:
1.
To introduced new blood into
a political system considered to be the
domain of historically
entrenched
interests. It was felt that
the old and conventional
political leaders
discouraged
young
politicians to participate in election.
2.
To provide positive measures
for marginalized citizens
which include women,
workers,
peasants-to
have access to politics;
and
3.
To improve service delivery of social
services in particular. It was argued
that if local
governments,
appropriately empowered, staffed
and resourced, would deliver
better primary
health,
education and municipal services
like water and sanitation. A
second service-delivery
objective
was to improve the laws about
property, labour rights and
economic activities
were
determined
and enforced. Thus, local
governments were given responsibilities to
regulate and
administer
laws on land, labour natural
resources.
4.
The devolution also aimed to
facilitate access to justice. The
belief that performance of
local
administration,
courts and police would
improve basic human
rights.
Citizen
Participation
Since
devolution aimed at providing
and improving services at the
local level, therefore, Citizen
Community
Boards (CCBs) are set up
for alternate dispute resolution,
monitoring of court
conduct,
promoting
justice, accountability of the police and
administrative grievance redressal. The
CCB comprise
145
Introduction
To Public
AdministrationMGT111
VU
elected
people of the area, teachers, doctors,
lawyers and other
professional. The CCB
monitors various
programme
implemented at local level.
Administrative
Reforms
The
executive branch of each
district government is divided into
10-13 departments, depending
upon
the provinces that carry out
its functions. The District
Coordination Officer (DCO)
established as the
highest-ranking
civil servant in the district, heads the
District Coordination Department. The
office of DC
has
been abolished and its
powers divided among the district
and session judge, district
nazim, the District
Police
Officer (DPO) and the DCO.
An Executive District Officer (EDO)
heads each of the remaining
departments.
In tehsil the Tehsil Municipal Officer
(TMO) performs coordination function
similar to EDO.
There
are 4 tehsil, taluka
or
Town Officers (TO), reporting to the
TMO: TO (Regulation), TO
(Infrastructure),
TO (Finance) and TO Planning).
Provincial
Finance Commission (PFC)
Changes
in fiscal transfers have
been made to complement the
devolution of expenditure
responsibilities.
On the pattern of federal provincial
arrangements transfer to local government
were to
the
determine by PFC. Local governments
have been given the powers to
raise some additional
revenues
and
Provincial Finance Commissions
(PFCs) have been established
to make awards for
distribution of
resources
between the province and
local governments as well as
distribution among local
governments.
According
to the legislation establishing PFC, the
PFC is to evolve a formula for
distribution of
resources.
The legal provision of the
PFC Ordinance aim at the creation of medium-term
formula based
transfer
system. It took some time
for PFC to announce its
first award, because the
office of PFC was
not
set
up. The PFC interim award
was made in 2002. It was
intended to cover the first two
quarters of 2003.
Full
award was announced by the
end of the first quarter Financial
Year (FY) 2003 to cover the
last two
quarter
of FY 2003 and the subsequent 3
years (FY 2004-06). The
final award has not
been made and
interim
awards were extended to
cover the rest of FY
2003.
What
constitutes a divisible pool
for allocation of local share varies
somewhat across
provinces
with
the general practices that
provinces make some
exceptions from Provincial Consolidated
Fund.
The
local share of the divisible
pool is as follows:
Punjab
39.8%
to districts
Sindh
40.0%
to districts
NWFP
40.0%
to districts
Balochistan
31.0%
to districts.
Population
is the most important indicator
used in all provincial
awards.
Responsibilities
Following
are responsibilities of local
government:
1.
Elementary
and secondary
education,
2.
Primary
and secondary health,
3.
Agriculture
and intra-district
roads.
4.
Towns
and tehsils have been
assigned municipal service responsibilities-including
local
roads
and streets, water supply
systems and sewers and
sanitation.
5.
Although
union administrations have not
been assigned any major
service-delivery
responsibilities,
they are responsible for
small-scale development projects
Separation
of powers
The
office of the deputy commissioner was the
local face of the government. This office
performed
executive,
magisterial, judicial and development
function. It had all administrative
powers to implement
official
policy. The creation of the office of the
District Coordination Officer
has also entailed the
abolition
of
the office of the district magistrate
and the cadre of executive
magistrate under deputy
commissioner.
146
Introduction
To Public
AdministrationMGT111
VU
With
devolution, all judicial
powers of the executive magistracy
are now vested in the
judiciary;
each
civil judge now also
acts as a judicial magistrate,
while the District and
Session Judge exercises
the
powers
of the erstwhile district
magistrate.
The
police that functioned under the deputy
commissioner now are placed
under nazim.
Political
Reform
As
it has been mentioned that the
Devolution Plan also aimed
at political reforms. The
purpose of
political
reforms was to introduce young people in
politics. Thus a union council which
has a population of
25,000,
some 126,462 new union
councilors were elected. A
union council is composed of 21
directly
elected
members. The union nazim
becomes member of Zila council
and naib nazim member of
Tehsil
council.
The remaining 19 seats are as
follows:
12
Muslim seats (4 are reserved
for women), 6 seats for
peasants and workers (2 are
reserved for
women),
1 seat for minority
communities.
Concepts
Citizen
Community Board:
These
are bodies at district level
that oversee the work
of
government
departments.
District
Coordination Officer:
Is
an officer at district level that
has to coordinate the
functions
of department at district level.
147
Table of Contents:
|
|||||