|
|||||
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
Lesson
# 42
IMPLEMENTATION:
PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM MODEL
The
Punctuated Equilibrium (PE) model
presents the synthesized version of the
two approaches on
implementation
of change. This is considered to be a comprehensive
and integrated view of the
two
approaches
studied earlier that was,
incrementalism and radicalism. There
are scholars who
believe
both
approaches are complementary rather
than conflicting, and the
issue is not whether, but
when to
adopt
incrementalist or transformational approach.
These scholars are Greiner;
Miller & Freisen,
Tushman
and they do not prescribe one desirable
change type but suggest a
model entailing
lifecycle
approach
and dual feature of
stability and turbulence. Hence the
related concepts are
Organization Life
Cycle
Theory, Greiner's model and
Organization Learning.
Now
the features of two earlier
models or approaches are
as:
Features
of incremental change
Unidirectional
Continuous
Constant
learning
Relevant
at all or multiple levels of
organizations
Converging
&
Short
term based
Features
of Radical Change
Multi-directional
Discontinuous
Periodic
learning
Relevant
at upper echelon of organization
(top-level)
Frame-breaking
Long
term based
Therefore
we need to synthesis both. Hence PE
model contains features or attributes of
both types.
Earlier
we have studied Greiner's model of
metamorphosis. The model was
developed by Tushman and
Romanelli
who argued that organization
progresses through convergent periods
punctuated by re-
orientations
which demark and set bearings for the
next convergent period.
Convergent periods are
relatively
long spans of incremental
change and adaptation,
whereas reorientations are
relatively short
periods
of radical discontinuous change.
Change is theorized on five domains of
organization activity:
·
Culture
·
Strategy
·
Structure
·
Power
structure and
·
Control
system - together they all
constitute to form strategic
orientation
(Tushman
& Romanelli)
Momentum
A
relevant definition of concern is
momentum which means for
long periods of relatively stable,
slow
and
predictable organizational interspersed
with short and intense periods of massive
changes in
momentum
within the organization.
To
Miller and Freisen, long periods of the maintenance of
a given configuration, punctuated by
brief
periods
of multi faceted and concerted
transition
129
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
P-E
model suggest four types of
organizational change
1.
Fine tunings ongoing
process of finding fit or
matches between strategies, structure,
people
processes.
2.
Incremental adjustment (Quinn's
model)
3.
Modular transformation major
re-alignment of one or more departments or
divisions.
4.
Corporate transformation radical
shift in strategy and rev changes in
whole organization
The
purpose of organizational change is to
move from one state to the desired
state in different ways
incremental
and radical
Theory
of P-E model
This
model has following
attributes to explain the phenomenon of
organizational transformation:
·
It
enables predictions about
patterns of fundamental organizational
transformation
·
The
theory accounts for tension
between the forces of stability and
change
·
Organizations
establish an initial pattern of activity
based on the environmental
conditions
prevailing
and managerial decisions made
during their time of
founding.
·
As
a result of inertia and
institutionalization organizations
develop coherent systems of
shared
understandings
that support continuation of the established
patterns.
·
Therefore
according to P-E model
radical and discontinuous change is
necessary to break the
inertia
With
these attributes author of the
article came forth with the
following theorization:
Hypothesis
1:
organizational transformation will
most frequently occur in short,
discontinuous bursts
of
change involving most or all
key domains of organizational
activity
PE
theorists suggests the interdependence of
organizational sub-units; and argue that
organization must
be
constructed so as to ensure a complementary
alignment among structural variables
(buyers,
suppliers,
financial backers, pattern of
culture, norms & ideology) as against
the incremental view
who
emphasize
the relative independence of organization subunits
dealing incrementally and
disjointedly
with
one problem and one goal at a time in
short run reactionary
manner
Hypothesis
2: Small
changes in individual domains of
organizational activity will
not accumulate
incrementally
to yield a fundamental
transformation
The
question then is how to have an
organizational transformation with PE
theoretical perspective? PE
theorists
believe resistance to change or
organizational inertia can be
broken through
revolutionary
transformation
means and conditions. Hypothesis
Number 3, 4 and 5 talks about the
triggers of
organizational
change
Hypothesis
No 3: Major
declines in the short term performance or sustained
decline over several
years
will
substantially increase the
likely hood of revolutionary
transformation.
Hypothesis
4: Major
changes in environmental conditions
will significantly increase the
likelihood of
revolutionary
transformation
Hypothesis
No 5: Installation
of a new chief executive
officer will significantly
increase the likelihood
of
revolutionary transformation
Important
question for us how this
type of change manifest in the
real life? Or what are the
indicators of
transformational
change in organizational dynamics. The
fundamental organizational
transformation
130
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
occurred
whenever there were substantial changes observed in
the strategy, structure and
power
distribution
domain of organizational activity
(power distribution means
appointment, key
positions
and
placements, hiring-firing, transfers). To
what extent these variables
are valid for
change
management
in public or corporate sector
organizations in Pakistan
131
Table of Contents:
|
|||||