|
|||||
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
LESSON
# 28
·
SYMBOLIC
PROCESSES
Change
processes are not always of
an overt, formal phenomenon and may
also be symbolic in
nature.
Symbolic acts and artefacts of an
organization and managers help
preserve the paradigm, and
there
exist a relation ship between
organization culture and its
strategy. Symbols are objects,
events,
acts
or people which express more
than their intrinsic content.
They may be everyday things
which
are
nevertheless meaningful in the context of
a particular situation. It is argued that
the creation or
manipulation
of symbol has impact, to the
extent that changing symbols
can reshape beliefs
and
expectation
because meaning becomes apparent in
day to day experience in the
organization.
Many
of rituals of the organizations are
implicitly concerned with
effecting or consolidating
change.
They
are capable of being managed
proactively: new rituals can
be introduced or old rituals
done
away
with. Symbolic significance is
also embedded in the systems and
processes of the organization.
Reward
system, information and control
system, and the very organizational
structures that
represent
reporting
relationships and often
status are also symbolic in
nature. For example take the
case of
selection
interview for organization. A
highly formal interview procedure
may signal a mechanistic,
hierarchical
organization, whereas a more informal
dialogue is likely to signal an
environment and
expectation
of challenge and questioning. If selection
processes are changed,
different types of
managers
are appointed, and visible
encouragement to challenge and
questioning is given, this
can
signal
within the organization a commitment to
strategic change. In this sense selection
processes are
symbolic
in nature.
Similarly
changes in physical aspects of the
work environment are
powerful symbols of change.
Typical
here is the location and change of
location for head office,
relocation of personnel, changes
in
dress or uniform, and
alteration to office space or
office space
The
most powerful symbol of all
is the behaviour of change agent
themselves, particularly strategic
leaders.
Their behaviour, language and the stories
associated with them signal
very powerfully the
need
for change and appropriate
behaviour relating to the management of
change.
Beside
stories, rumours on grapevine the use of
language used by change agent also
effects change
process.
Either consciously or unconsciously
change agents may employ
language and metaphor to
galvanise
change. In this context language is
also powerful not only
for the communication of
facts
and
information but because of
its symbolic significance
and is able to carry several
meanings at
once.
·
Political
Processes
One
can not escape politics
where there is human concern. The reconfiguration of
power structure in
the
organization is needed which
depends on the nature of change. Radical
or transformational the
type
of change more radical will be the
reconfiguration of power structure. The
momentum for
change
will need powerful advocacy
within the organization, typically
from the chief
executive,
members
of board, union and other
influential outsiders. Change occurs in
organization combining
the
interest and power of individual and groups,
thereby making the understanding of
political
context
in and around organization quite
essential for achieving
change successfully.
Like
else where in organization too there is a
ruling party (unsaid) and
opposition party whether it
is
a
public or private sector
organization. Members of organization
perceive to be on either side, and
the
nature
of nature of opposition varies from the
type of industry, sector and
size of organization.
Similar
concept is of organization elite,
trustworthy and loyal people
are appointed on key or
prime
position
for the use of authority and
control of resources. Thus change
may either means a threat
for
existing
elites or perpetuation of their
rule. Therefore people, rules
and resources are
manipulated to
69
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
achieve
change related objectives.
The successful change
management means involvement in
the
political
activities like building the
power or political base,
overcoming resistance and
achieving
compliance
for change related policies
and objective. Categorically stating the
political activities
may
include
the followings:
i)
to
build the political support or power
base
ii)
to
encourage support or overcome
resistance
iii)
to
achieve commitment to a strategy or course of
action
COMMUNICATING
CHANGE
Of
all, communication is perhaps the
most complex human and organizational
phenomenon. So
communication
change, what it is intended to achieve or
what is involved in the
communication
process
and the way to communicate is in
fact a very complex one. The
effective communication of
vision,
mission and strategic intent down to
lower tiers of or all across
organization is not a
simple
and
easier task. It may be important to
clarify and simplify further
the priorities of the strategy.
One
approach
is to emphasise a limited number of key
components or aspects of strategy rather
than to
communicate
the strategy with overall complexity and
ramification. The choices of media
also vary
from
employing techniques such as face-to-face,
one-to-one, through routine
bulletins and notice
boards
and circulars around the organization.
The involvement of members of
organization in the
strategy
development process or planning strategic
change is also, in itself is means
of
communication
and can be very effective.
Communication needs to be seen as a
two-way process.
Feedback
on communication is important,
particularly if the changes to be
introduced are difficult
to
understand
or threatening or if it is critically
important to get the changes right.
One such effective
technique
to get feed back is through focus group
employed by senior executives to see
the
implementation
and acceptance of change. Another
powerful technique is the
use of grapevine
(informal
communication) which takes the
form of gossips, rumours and
storytelling. Now senior
executive
wants to control and manage the
grapevine in the best interests of the
organization.
·
Change
Tactics
There
are also some very
specific tactics of change
which might be employed to
facilitate change
process
i)
Timings
The
importance of timing is often neglected
in thinking about strategic change.
Timing also refers
to
choosing the right time tactically to
promote change. For example
the greater the degree of
change
the more it may be useful to build on
actual or perceived crisis. If members of
the
organization
perceive a higher risk in
maintaining the status quo
than in changing it, they
are more
likely
to change. Another important
tactic for acceptance or
rejection of change is the sequence
of
events;
or how the change is introduced,
piecemeal or as a whole and which should
come first and
which
should come later.
ii)
Dismissals, Job Losses and
Delayering
Change
programmes are often
associated with job losses,
from the closure of units of the
organization,
with hundreds or thousands of job
losses, to the removal senior executives or
even
chief
executive. For example this
becomes so especially if the organization
is in its drive for
automation,
resulting in the removal of the whole
layers of management and hierarchy. It
was
during
1990s when larger MNCs were
going for mergers,
restructuring and outsourcing
that
thousands
of employees lost their jobs
out of change in strategy.
Therefore the tactical choice of
where
job losses should take place
related to the change programme
iii)
Visible Short Term
Wins
70
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
Strategy
may be conceived of as having to do
with long term direction and
major decisions.
Nonetheless
what is essential is to have the
implementation of strategy is that change
programme
should
have detailed action plans and tasks
associated with strategy.
For example a retail
chain
developing
a new store concept and
demonstrating its success in the
market may need short
term
wins
like the effective breaking
down of working of old ways
and the demonstration of better
ways;
the
speeding up of decisions by doing away
with committees and introducing
clearly defined job
responsibilities,
and so on.
iv)
Promoting
Winners & Heroes
Change
most of the time result in
creating either winners or
losers. It is not considered win-win
for
every
one. What is needed by senior leadership is to
promote winners and heroes as
symbol of high
performers
so that this may create a
culture of high performance. Success
stories are propagated
amongst
managers for their mind and
behavioural programming and repeat
success. This in
overall
is
considered important tactic in the
implementation of strategy.
References:
This
lecture is based on Chapter 11,
Managing Strategic change of Exploring
Corporate Strategy
written
by Johnson & Johnson. 10th edition.
For
change in organization culture
see further
www.soi.org
For
MOUND model see Alex
Miller's book on Strategic Management
4th edition
71
Table of Contents:
|
|||||