|
|||||
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
LESSON
# 20
CLASSIFICATION
OF ORGANIZATIONAL SPECIES
Another
major issue is the classification of
organizational specie. Like
biology it emphasizes
population
within a species as unit of analysis.
But then the problem is what
characterizes an
organizational
form (Specie)? Hannan and Freeman
state, "An organization form is a
blue print for
organizational
action, for transforming
inputs into out puts."
The blue print can
usually be inferred
by
examining any of the
following:
·
Formal
structure of the organization in the narrow
sense, that is through
written rules of
operations
·
Pattern of
activity within the organization-
what actually gets done by
whom.
·
Normative
order- the ways of organizing that
are defined as right and
proper by both
members
and relevant sectors of the
environment
Ulrich
defines form as a "legally
defined entity" with a
population of firms consisting of
similar
competencies,
structures and strategies.
Similarly organization form
can be determined according
to
other
criteria, for e.g. technology,
industry grouping and
product.
2.
Extent of Environmental
Selection
The
population ecology model
stress that the environment determines
the distribution and form of
organization
through selection. Here environment in a
biological sense is not a
objective
phenomenon.
Biologists refer to a very
interesting phenomenon of environmental
niche. The
environmental
niche in an environment perceived by ANT
is clearly different from
that perceived
by
an ELEPHANT; minor changes in an
environment may spell the
demise of population of
ANTS
but
be unnoticed by an ELEPHANT. In the same
way the environmental niches
inhabited by
SMALL
and LARGE organizations are
subjectively different. Therefore
different species
(organization)
perceive and experience the environment
differently. Another thing to be
take note
of
is that environments are
multidimensional and complex, not
similar for all type of
organization.
Hence
environment is different for
different type of organizations,
while the ecological approach
suggests
that one focus one common fate
with respect to environmental
variation.
Now
the question is what is the effect of
changes in environment on the mortality
of population.
Individual
organization mortality may be there
out of an accident, incompetence, or rational
choice.
So
distinction should be there when owners
arbitrarily decide to close down the
business for
personal
or for economic reasons. Similarly owners
also set the tone for
level of growth and
profitability.
Another scholar talked of vital
rates of founding and mortality (entries
and exit), and
process
of founding and mortality of
organization. So the thrust of
organization ecology should
be
the
investigation of the leading question,
how social environment
shapes the following dimensions
of
organization:
·
Rates
of creation and death of org.
forms,
·
Rates
of org. founding and mortality,
and
·
Rates
of change in organization forms.
What
is more important to discuss and for
further research is the relationship
between adaptation
and
selection, and determinant of vital
rates.
Relationship
between Adaptation and
Selection
One
such empirical study conducted by
Carroll found the role of strategy in a
way that the timing
of
executive
succession was found to be and
important factor in organization
survival. Similarly in
biological
sense, adaptability is an individual
behavioral phenomenon. Penning stressed
the role of
adaptation
and according to him, "Organization
will maneuver themselves in their
environment, so
46
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
as
to acquire optimum external control and
will shift their disposition
whenever environmental
conditions
dictate." To him entrepreneur is a
"volitional individual" who
enters an environment and
make
strategic choices that ensure the
best transactions with the
environment.
Determinants
of Vital Rates
Vital
rates means death rates and
founding rates of an organization.
This leads not only to the
study
of
large organizations but also
of entrepreneurship and small businesses.
Here we are concerned
with
the following possible determinants of organizational
death and inception:
·
Role
of competition
·
Institutional
constraints
·
Role
of government ( for example
subsidy, tax exemption given
by US government to
Chrysler
automobiles thrice in its
history)
·
Type
of product or industry becoming
obsolete
What
causes death of an organization?
Immediate factor could be
attributed to the consistent
sales
decline
or poor financial performance as the most
obvious indicator? However
going in depth may
reveal
these indicators as symptoms
not problems. For instance
what about the organizations
those
are
socially embedded and inter-linked
with each other through
alliances and network. In Japan
Keiretsu
or Chaebol in Korea or big
family based conglomerates in countries
like Pakistan where
social
identities and ties are more important
than technically or transaction driven
relationship.
Therefore
when social ties (death of a network)
cease to be effective hastens the death
of an
organization.
Similarly if central or lynch
pin organization may
forcibly closed, reorganized or
dissolved,
the constituent organization will have to
face a drift. Finally the
big issue in ecology
school
is the issue of diversified organization
(un-related diversification) or huge
conglomerates
who
dominate the international business;
are they equally affected by
environment or laws of
natural
selection.
47
Table of Contents:
|
|||||