Change
Management MGMT625
VU
LESSON
#12
LIMITATION
OF DIALECTICS; DA AND DI
Despite
tremendous benefits, there is one such
risk organization may run
into for employing
the
above
technique or process. For
instance the process may
damage group members'
feelings,
feelings
of rejection, depression, jealousy and
anger, and might even corrode morale and
working
relationship.
Therefore the dilemma for
management is to choose among (trade-off)
quality
decision
and group harmony. In real
life such type of trade off
often exists. Hence, in overall
analysis
the dialectical design in organisation is
introduced to have better planning.
The exercise
leads
to formulation of plan (thesis) counter
plan (anti-thesis) constructed on the
same databank
will
lead to synthesis, that is the
exposing hidden assumptions
and new conceptualisation
of
planning
problem which the organisation
faces. Further there are
following objections by
way
which
the process can prove to be counter
productive:
1.
Dialectic inquiry does not
identify the moving forces and
causes behind the
dialectical
process
and its realisation in strategic
policy planning.
2.
Source of thesis (plan) and anti-thesis
(counter plan) is not
clear
3.
It is not clear what governs the
synthesis process and what
determines the interpretation of
various
assumptions and strategies. As
happens in real life
organization meetings are by
its
very
nature supposed to be dialectic. Like
wise the danger is that the process may
be
politicised.
This may lead to
manufacturing of consent or opposition
may manifest for the
sake
of mere opposition in a narrowed and
rigid perspective.
4.
It is self-purposeful, partial and
incomplete: only deals with
the decision-making process
for
strategic planning and neither
with antecedents (past
history) of planning nor
with
planning
outcome
Therefore
in order to overcome weakness of the
process we ought to know the
pre-requisites the
dialectical
process.
Conditions
for exercising
dialectics
All
theories and models have advantages and disadvantages
and the applicability of theory is
permitted
under certain conditions.
Therefore certain conditions
ought to exist before going
for
such
kind of activity, and these
are:
1.
Management is unaware of assumptions or in
doubt or in disagreement) to
choose
appropriate
assumption and plan.
2.
Multiple and alternative interpretations
on the same data bank
3.
In case of uncertainty (constantly
changing world) management
tend to rely on
synthesised
set of assumptions or on synthesised
view of reality
4.
The cost of developing plan,
counter-plan or management's involvement in
the
development
of synthesised world view is
less than the cost of advisors'
(error in
assumption)
Overview
of application of dialectics
Primarily
this can be utilised as a
decision making and environmental
assessment technique
for
31
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
generating
alternative and scenarios. For e.g. A
decision maker who is provided
with conflicting
policy
recommendations may be involved in a
dialectical process.
It
is used for the production of
systematic knowledge for
organization, and as such can have
utility
for
the following business and corporate
functionalities:
·
Inquiry
systemdialectical conflict lead
dialectical inquiry
·
Business
gaming and simulation
·
Dialect
Problem-solving technology
(DPST)
·
Nominal
Group Training
·
Delphi
Method & control groups
·
Quality
circle
·
Cross-cultural
training
32