|
|||||
Business
Ethics MGT610
VU
LESSON
36
The
main objections to the
contractual theory maintain
that the assumptions on
which the
theory is
based are unrealistic.
Manufacturers do not deal directly
with consumers. They
do
deal
indirectly with them through
advertisements, however, and promoters of
the theory argue
that
advertisements forge the
indirect contractual relationship
between seller and the
buyer.
Another
objection to the theory
points out that consumer can
freely agree to purchase a
product
without
certain qualities. Manufacturers can be
released from normal
contractual obligations
simply
by disclaiming that the
product is safe and reliable.
Disclaimers can, in effect,
nullify all
of
the seller's contractual
duties.
Finally,
critics of this theory point
out that the assumption
that buyer and seller meet on
equal
ground
is false. Buyers and sellers
are not equally skilled;
the seller is in a much
stronger
position
than the buyer. Sellers
only have to know their
own products, while buyers
need to
know
about every sellers'
products for every commodity
they purchase.
Another
objection to the theory
points out those consumers can
freely agree to purchase a
product
without certain qualities.
Manufacturers can be released from
normal contractual
obligations
simply by disclaiming that
the product is safe and
reliable. Disclaimers can,
in
effect,
nullify all of the seller's
contractual duties.
Finally,
critics of this theory point
out that the assumption
that buyer and seller meet on
equal
ground
is false. Buyers and sellers
are not equally skilled;
the seller is in a much
stronger
position
than the buyer. Sellers
only have to know their
own products, while buyers
need to
know
about every sellers'
products for every commodity
they purchase.
6.3
The Due Care
Theory
The
due care theory of the
manufacturer's duties to consumers is
based on the idea
that
consumers
and sellers do not meet as equals and the
consumer's interests are
particularly
vulnerable
to being harmed by the
manufacturer, who has a
knowledge and an expertise that
the
consumer
lacks. Because manufacturers
are in a more advantaged position,
they have a duty to
take
special care to ensure that the
products they offer do not
harm the consumers'
interests.
The
doctrine of caveat emptor is here replaced
with a weak version of the
doctrine of caveat
vendor.
Let the seller take care.
Because consumers must rely
on the expertise of
the
manufacturer,
they have a duty not
only to deliver a product
that lives up to the express
and
implied
claims they make about it.
They have a duty to exercise due
care to prevent others
from
being
injured by the product, even
if they explicitly disclaim
such responsibility.
Due
care must enter into
the product's design, choice of
materials and construction
methods,
quality
control, and warnings attached to it.
Failure to exercise due care in these
areas is a
breach
of the manufacturer's moral
duties. This theory rests on
the principle that agents
have a
moral
duty not to harm or injure
others. The principle can be defended by
the ethics of care,
of
course,
but rule utilitarianism,
Kant, and Rawls can all also be
used as a solid basis for
the
theory.
85
Business
Ethics MGT610
VU
Manufacturers'
responsibilities to exercise due care
extend to the following
three areas:
1.
Design - a product's design should
not conceal any dangers,
should incorporate
all
feasible
safety devices, and use adequate
materials. The design should
additionally be
well
tested to ensure that consumers will
use the product
properly.
2.
Production
- the
manufacturing process must be
controlled to eliminate any
defective
items, identify weaknesses,
and ensure that unsafe
economizing
measures
are not taken.
3.
Information - the firm
should fix labels, notices, and
instructions on the
product
warning
of all potential dangers
involved in using or misusing
the item.
Manufacturers
must also take into consideration
the capacities of the
persons who they
expect
will
use the product. If the
possible harmful effects of using a
product are serious or if
they
cannot
be adequately understood without
expert opinion, then sale of
the product should be
carefully
controlled.
There
are three difficulties with
the due care theory. The
basic problem with it is
that there is
no
way to determine when one
has exercised enough due care.
Every product involves
some
small
risk; if all risks were
eliminated, few if any
products would be affordable.
Secondly, the
theory
assumes that the
manufacturer can indeed discover all
the risks attendant upon
using a
product
before it is actually used and
this may not be possible.
Finally, the theory is to
some,
paternalistic,
assuming that the
manufacturer alone should make
the important decisions
about
the
level of risk the consumer
should bear. Perhaps such
decisions should be left up to
consumers,
who can decide for
themselves whether or not
they want to pay for
additional safety
measures.
Key
Terms
brand
loyalty
The
result of effective advertising campaigns
on
consumers,
which gives large
corporations control
over
a major portion of the
market.
caveat
emptor
"let
the buyer beware."
caveat
vendor
"let
the seller beware."
commercial
advertising
Communication
between a seller and
potential
buyers
that is publicly addressed to a
mass
audience
and is intended to induce
several
members
of this audience to buy the
seller's
products.
contractual
theory (of a The view
that the relationship
between a business
seller's
duties)
and
its customers is a contractual
one; the moral
duties
to the customer are those
created by this
contract.
disclaimer
A
statement made by a
seller explicitly
disclaiming
that the product
is reliable,
serviceable,
or safe.
86
Business
Ethics MGT610
VU
due
care theory (of a the
theory that, since consumers
must depend on
seller's
duties)
the
greater expertise of the manufacturer,
the
manufacturer
not only has a duty to
deliver a
product
that lives up to the express
and implied
claims
about it, but also has a
duty to exercise due
care
to prevent others from being
injured by the
product--even
if the manufacturer
explicitly
disclaims
such responsibility.
duty
not to coerce
The
duty of a seller not to take advantage
of
gullibility,
immaturity, ignorance, or any
other
factor
that might reduce the
buyer's ability to make
a
rational choice.
duty
not to misrepresent
The
duty of a seller not to
deliberately deceive the
buyer
into thinking something
about a product that
the
seller knows is
false.
duty
of disclosure
The
duty of a seller to inform
the buyer of any
facts
about the product that
would affect the
decision
to purchase it.
duty
to comply
According
to the contractual theory,
the seller has
a
duty to carry through on any
implied claims he
knowingly
makes about the
product.
free
riders
Individuals
who acquire a benefit paid
for by
others
who desire the same
benefit.
implied
claim
A
claim about the quality or
character of a product
that
is knowingly, though not
explicitly, made by a
seller.
implied
warranty
The
indirect contractual
relationship made
between
a company and its customers by
its
advertisements.
maintainability
The
ease with which a product
can be repaired and
kept
in operating condition.
market
approach
to
Consumer safety is seen as a good
that is most
consumer
protection
efficiently
provided through the
mechanism of the
free
market whereby sellers must
respond to
consumer
demands.
physical
privacy
Privacy
with respect to a person's
physical
activities.
production
costs / selling With
reference to advertising, production
costs are
costs
the
costs of the resources
consumed in producing a
product;
selling costs are the
additional costs of
resources
that do not go into changing
the product
but
rather are invested in
persuading people to buy
it.
product
safety
Implied
and express claims that
refer to the degree
of
risk associated with using a
product.
psychological
privacy
Privacy
with respect to a person's
inner life.
87
Business
Ethics MGT610
VU
rational
utility maximizer A person who
has a well-defined and
consistent
set
of preferences, and who is certain
how
personal
choices will affect those preferences.
reasonable
risk
A
risk that is known and
judged to be acceptable
by
the buyer.
reliability
The
probability that a product will
function as the
consumer
is led to expect.
right
to privacy
The
right of persons to determine
what, to whom,
and
how much information about
themselves will
be
disclosed to other parties.
selling
costs
The
additional costs of resources
that do not go
into
changing the product, but
are invested instead
in
persuading people to buy the
product.
service
life
The
period of time during which
a product will
function
as effectively as the consumer is
led to
expect
it to function.
social
costs theory (of a The
theory that the duties of
the manufacturer
seller's
duties)
extend
far beyond those imposed by
contractual
and
due care duties; manufacturers
should pay the
cost
of any injuries sustained through
any defects
in
their products, even when
they exercise due
care
and have taken all
reasonable precautions.
(Related
to the legal doctrine of
strict liability.)
strict
liability
A
legal doctrine that holds
that manufacturers
must
bear the "external" costs of
injuries resulting
from
unavoidable defects in the design of
an
artifact
constitute part of the costs
society must
pay
for producing and using an
artifact.
88
Table of Contents:
|
|||||