|
|||||
Conflict
Management HRM624
VU
Lesson
35
LAW AND
ETHICS OF MEDIATION I
Quotation
In
civilized life, law floats in a sea of
ethics.
Earl
Warren
Why
is mediation Regulated?
The
regulation of mediation can be best understood as a
series of efforts designed to
protect and preserve
the
essence of the process, to ensure
its effectiveness, and to
ensure that, as it is used, other
legal rights and
obligations
are not damaged. The
more radical wing of the ADR
movement argues that the presence of
the
invisible
veil keeps us from truly
realizing the promise of mediation.
· To
preserve the essence of mediation
· To
ensure the effectiveness of
mediation
· To
protect other legal
rights
Mediation
is a legal event. Mediation technique is
influenced by psychological considerations
and sometimes
resembles
psychotherapy. But situation is slowly
changing as mediation becomes
more widespread and
institutionalized.
Preserving
the Essence of
Mediation
It is
easy to determine whether there is a
third-party intermediary involved in a
dispute resolution
process,
although
whether a given intermediary is correct to refer to
his or her services as mediation is
sometimes
controversial.
The second element of the
essence of mediation, the need for
self determination, has
been
the
topic of far more controversy
among both mediation scholars
and policy makers. Mediation
is a diverse
process.
It can be almost unrecognizable to a
colleague, so it can be
abused.
Characteristics
of mediation:
Following
are the characteristics of
mediation.
1. A
third-party mediator must be
involved
2.
Mediation is characterized by disputants'
self-determination
3.
Intermediary involved
4.
Little regulation exists to control
mediator "truth is advertising"
5. Controversy
among both mediation scholars
and policymakers
6.
Self-determination is regarded as "the fundamental
principle of mediation"
7.
Participation of Mediator
8.
Impartiality and
neutrality
9.
Truth and advertising and
client-informed consent to the
process
10.
Client self-determination
11.
Need for informed
consent
12.
Distinguishing of mediation from
evaluative ADR
13.
Preservation of Mediation as a Non-adversarial
Process
14.
Confidentiality in mediation
Ensuring
the effectiveness of
mediation
Mediation
is also regulated to ensure
its effectiveness, however, here
also controversy and uncertainty
abound.
The most important regulatory
issue that springs from the
motivation to ensure
effectiveness
relates
to the confidentiality of mediation. It is the
consensus of most mediation scholars
and practitioners
that,
for mediation to work well, it must be
confidential.
Effectiveness
in mediation is also promoted through the
regulation of mediator credentialing,
competence,
and
conduct.
1.
Effectiveness depends upon
personal attitudes
2. Short term
goals will promote
evaluative mediation
3.
Long term goals will promote
facilitative mediation
4.
Confidentiality: most unsettled
area of mediation law
119
Conflict
Management HRM624
VU
6.
Perspectives
on effectiveness: short- vs. long-term
and broad vs. narrow
7.
Confidentiality
8.
Enforceability
of settlement
9.
Constructing
settlement agreement
10.
Good-faith
participation
11.
Ensuring competent
mediators:
Protecting
other Rights:
The
third major reason for the regulation of
mediation is to protect the rights held by the
participants in
mediation
and others affected by the
process.
1. Due
process consideration
2.
Safety issues
3.
Conflict with other
rights
1.
Due Process
Considerations:
Limitations
on coercion in mediation; informal
consent; lifting of confidentiality to
protect the rights to give
evidence
in other proceedings are
some of the considerations.
2.
Safety Issues:
Mediation
in abuse situations is concerned
with the safety
issues.
3. Conflict
with Other Rights:
Confidentiality
of mediation involving the government: effects of
laws rendering proceedings open to
the
public
Legal
Issues in Mediation
The
need to preserve essential
aspects of the mediation process, and to
preserve and promote
the
effectiveness
of mediation, has led to efforts to
regulate mediation in a number of
areas.
Confidentiality
Most
kinds of mediation are held in a confidential
setting; that is, secrets
revealed or communications
made
in mediation
can't be shared with others
or used in litigation. Confidentiality is
invoked because it is
believed
that disputants won't feel as
free to communicate openly
with one another if they believe
that what
they
say or reveal might be used
against them. Moreover the
quality of mediation as a cooperative
process
could be
compromised if disputants believed that
communications in mediation would be the
subject of
discovery
or trial tactics later on.
Additionally, confidentiality is needed
to preserve the neutrality of the
mediator:
disputants participating in mediation
need to be reassured that the mediator
will not testify
against
them
later. Early in the mediation movement,
there were two principal
sources of confidentiality in
mediation:
law providing for the inadmissibility of
compromise negotiations and specific
contracts
specifying
that mediation be confidential.
Waiver
of Confidentiality
Statutes
and court rules, as
interpreted by decisional law,
provide for waiver of confidentiality in
particular
circumstances.
1.
Consent of the participants
2.
Mediator malpractice or malfeasance
claim or defense
3.
Protection of mediation process
4.
Matter to be resolved was
not confidential to begin
with
5. Evidence of a
crime or child
abuse/neglect
6. To
uphold the administration of justice
(more critical need to provide
justice in another case)
7.
Confidentiality in conflict with another
explicit law
Summary
Mediation
can be practiced in a given frame of
law. The rules to govern mediation
are derived from
ethics
which
prevail in the pertinent society.
Mediation should be practiced with the
provisions of law to promote
the
essence of mediation, effectiveness of mediation, to
protect legal rights, and to
promote justice in
society
at large.
120
Table of Contents:
|
|||||