|
|||||
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
LESSON
#18
PHASE
4: COORDINATION
This
evolutionary phase is characterized by the
use of formal system for
achieving greater coordination,
and by top
executives taking responsibility for the
initiation and administration of new
systems. For e.g.
decentralized
units are merged into
product-group-formal planning procedures
are established and
intensely
reviewed. Other features of
this phase are:
· Numerous
staff managers are hired at
headquarters (HQ) to initiate company
wide programs of
control and
review for line
managers.
· Capital
expenditure related decisions are
carefully made.
· Each
product group is treated as an investment
centre where return on investment
(ROI) is an
important
criterion for funds
allocation.
· Stock
options and profit-sharing schemes
used to encourage identity
with the firm as a
whole.
HO-subsidiary
dynamics (HQ- branch relationship) come
to play as a factor in
organization
growth or
performance
4. Red
Tape Crisis
Lack of
confidence and trust between line
and staff, and between HQ
and field; systems, program
and
procedures
go beyond their utility, and
become end in itself. Line
managers resent heavy
directions by
staffs,
which are unaware of local
conditions. Staffs on the other hand
complain about
uncooperative
and
uninformed line managers.
Therefore procedure takes precedence
over problem solving,
and
innovation
is dampened
Lawrence
& Lorsch highlighted this in
their study as the problem of
differentiation and integration.
As
organizations
become large, vertical and
horizontal differentiation becomes
pronounced. The problem
at
this
stage is higher the differentiation,
higher will be the need for
integration.
PHASE
5: COLLABORATION
To overcome crisis of
red-tape crisis strong inter-personal
collaboration is suggested in this
phase.
Now the
question is; what is the
difference between Phase 4 of
Coordination and Phase 5 of
collaboration?
The difference is that
Coordination phase was
managed more through formal
system and
institutional
procedures while Phase 5
(collaboration emphasises greater
spontaneity in managerial
actions
through teams and the skilful
confrontation of interpersonal
differences.
Social
control and self discipline
take over from control.
This transition is very
difficult for those
who
create and
believe on the formal methods of
report and answers. The
phase evolution builds
more
flexible and
behavioural approach to management. Here
are some of its
features:
· The
focus is on problem-solving quickly
through team-thinking and
team-actions
· Teams
are combined across-functions
· HQ-staff
experts are reduced in numbers-combined in
cross-functional teams to consult
(not to
direct)
field units
· Formal
systems and procedures are
simplified to focus on tasks
· Conference of
key managers are held on
major organizational
issues
· Reliance
on educational and training
programs for conflict-resolution and
better team work
· Real-time
information system are
integrated into daily
decision-making
· Rewards
are geared more towards team performance
than individual achievement
· Experiment
with new practices are
tolerated and encouraged
42
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
The
Crisis
What
will be the revolution in this
stage of evolution?
Many
large and mature multinational
(MNCs) are in this
phase.
Any way
whatever the answer is, the sole focus is
that each evolutionary
period culminates into a
revolutionary
period, which is short and spasmodic
and transformative for the
existing managerial
system, and
the processes are never
ending and perpetual
ones.
For
Compulsory and Further
Readings
1.
Miles
Raymond E., Organization
Development Reading
8.1
2.
_________
Developing an Organization that
contribute to long run effectiveness Ch
8
3.
Greiner,
Larry E., Evolution and
Revolution as Organizations Grow
Reading 8.2
4.
Also
published in HBR July
Aug 1972 (can be accessed
through J-Store HEC Digital
Library)
5.
Drucker,
Peter F, The Need to Prepare
for Growth, Reading
8.3
43
Table of Contents:
|
|||||