|
|||||
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
LESSON
# 13
THEORIES
OF CHANGE IN ORGANISATIONS
4.
Evolutionary Theory of
Change
First
thing we know is that it is
also the concept of evolution
which is also equated with
change.
Darwin, the
famous biological scientist is known as
the leading protagonist of this
theory. The term
organic
evolution means how a living
organism grows and shrinks over time. We
are also familiar
with
the debate
between mechanistic versus organic
organization. Therefore the question
is; are organization
like
living organism follow principles of
natural evolution? The metaphor is
borrowed from
biology,
and as in
biological evolution change
proceeds through a continuous
cycle of variation, selection and
retention.
In context of organization these
terms have the following
meanings:
Variation
refers to the creations of novel forms of organisations
are often viewed to emerge
by blind or
random
chance. Variation may be strategic or
structural or operational in nature for
e.g. Innovation in
organisational
functional areas. Implied
here is the relationship of organization
and its environment
changes
over a period of time.
Changes in strategy and structural
activities characterise this
relationship
or in other
words, organizations continue to define
and redefine its
relationship with
environment.
Therefore
external change leads to
change in strategy which eventually
culminates in change of
structure.
For example, growth
(opportunity) in industry (part of
environment) will result in the
growth
objective
(increase in sales) of organization,
will lead to in manpower (HR) and
hence will lead to
change in
management form/practices. Imperative
might be the transformation of autocratic
style to
participative
style of decision making. In
other words a single organization cannot
grow indefinitely and
still
maintain its original form.
Variation is bound to be there and this
variation depends on
adaptive
capacity
varies (of technology, capital,
trained personnel, etc)
Selection of
organisation occurs principally
through the competition of scarce
resources and the
environment
selects entities that best
fit the resource base of an
environmental niche. Some
organisms
or variants
perform better as changes occur in
environment while other die
or become extinct.
Retention
involves forces (including
inertia and persistence) that perpetuate
and maintain certain
organisational
forms. Retention serves to counteract the
self-reinforcing loop between selection
and
variation.
The
same concept is known as
evolutionary thinking. Now
change managers, CEOs and
consultants
want to make
organization as an evolutionary
organization. The evolutionary
thinking is described to
entail the
following features:
1.
All events
are time bound
2.
No such
thing/phenomenon is absolute
3.
Focus on
historical particular for
explaining causation
4.
Study of
context is important
5.
The
theory also accounts for
diversity of the organic
world.
6.
Account
for variations in organizational strategy
and its structure
Therefore
evolution explains change as a recurrent,
cumulative, and probabilistic progression
of
variation,
selection and retention of organisation
entities (forms and practices).
Organization mutates;
mutation in
biological terms means
change in genetic character
which means transformation in
genetic
codification.
Change in genetic character is a matter
of random variation (chance). In context
of
organizational
innovation in different functional
areas of organization (managers in
various
departments) in a random
manner discover efficient and
effective ways of management. The
discovery
of such
changes could relate to two
broader categories; systemic change and
operational change.
Systemic
change addresses the issue of
effectiveness while operational level
change is concerned
with
efficiency
improvement. Typically organizations have
growth as strategic objectives; and
the
relationship
between control and growth is more
pronounced according to most of the
management
33
Change
Management MGMT625
VU
consultants.
This is considered to be inversely
related with each other.
For higher level
growth
organization
control has to be relaxed
and decentralized. Another way to
look at an evolving
organization
is to study entrepreneurship especially
how do smaller organizations transform
themselves
into a
large organization? Organizations cannot
grow with single or constant
management style or
organization
structure and hence variation in
organization and organization structure is
bound to occur.
The
same thinking is related
with what is known as concurrent
engineering. By going for
management
audit
one tends to evaluate forms
and practices which are
needed and those which are
considered
redundant
and futile, in production or
manufacturing process.
There
are two theoretical
approaches further within the
evolutionary school which differ in
terms of
how
traits are inherited, the rate of
change and unit of analysis. One is
Darwinian approach which
believes
that organization traits are
inherited through inter-generational
processes. Darwinian theorists
believe in
continuous and gradual
process of evolution. While there
are scholars who
follow
Lamarckian
line, and argue that traits
are acquired within a generation
through learning and
imitation.
Most
analysts believe that
Lamarckian view is more applicable and
appropriate than strict
Darwinism in
context of
organisation and management, especially
on the acquisition of traits. This is
more in line with
learning
capability of an organization.
Unit of
Change
Evolution
theories operate on multiple entities,
that is on intra-organisational,
organisational,
population,
communities as against OLC and
teleological theories which operate
within single entity.
Evolutionary
forces are defined in terms
of the impact they have on populations
and have no meaning at
the level of
the individual entity.
Mode of
Change
Evolutionary
theories incorporate a prescribed mode of
change, which is of continuously
evolving
character.
Evolutionary theories rely on the
statistical accumulation of small
individual events to
gradually
change the nature of the larger
population.
34
Table of Contents:
|
|||||