|
|||||
If
you want to wear light
spats, stop and think whether
your heavy ankles will
not
look
more trim in boots with
light, glove-fitting tops and black
vamps.
We
have seen women with
such slender ankles and
shapely insteps, that
white
slippers or
low shoes might be worn
with black or coloured
stockings. But it is
playing
safe to have your stockings
match your slippers or
shoes.
Buckles
and bows on slippers and
pumps can destroy the
line of a shoe and hence a
foot,
or continue and accentuate line. There
are fashions in buckles and
bows, but
unless
you bend the fashion until
it allows nature's work to
appear at its best, it
will
destroy
artistic intention.
Some
people buy footwear as they
buy fruit; they like
what they see, so they get
it!
You
know so many women, young
and old, who do this, that
our advice is, try
to
recall
those who do not. Yes, now
you see what we aim
at; the women you
have in
mind
always continue the line of
their gowns with their
feet. You can see with
your
mind's
eye how the slender
black satin slippers, one of
which always
protrudes
from
the black evening gown,
carry to its eloquent finish
the line from her
head
through
torso, hip to knee, and knee
down through instep to
toe,--a line so
frequently
obstructed by senseless trimmings,
lineless hats, and footwear
wrong in
colour
and line.
If
your gown is white and your
object to create line, can
you see how you
defeat
your
purpose by wearing anything but
white slippers or
shoes?
At
a recent dinner one of the
young women who had
sufficient good taste to
wear
an
exquisite gown of silk and
silver gauze, showing a pale
magenta ground with
silver
roses, continued the colour
scheme of her designer with
silver slippers,
tapering
as Cinderella's, but spoiled
the picture she might
have made by breaking
her
line and enlarging her
ankles and instep with magenta
stockings. This could
have
been avoided by the use of
silver stockings or magenta slippers
with magenta
stockings.
When
brocades, in several colours,
are chosen for slippers,
keep in mind that
the
ground
of the silk must absolutely
match your costume. It is
not enough that in
the
figure
of brocade is the colour of
the dress. Because so
distorting to line,
figured
silks
and coloured brocades for
footwear are seldom a wise
choice.
To
those who cannot own a match
in slippers for each gown,
we would suggest that
the
number of colours used in
gowns be but few, getting
the desired variety
by
varying
shades of a colour, and then
using slippers a trifle
higher in shade than
the
general
colour selected.
CHAPTER
VIII
JEWELRY
AS DECORATION
HE
use of
jewelry as colour and line
has really nothing to do
with its intrinsic
worth.
Just as when furnishing a house, one
selects pictures for certain
rooms with
regard
to their decorative quality
alone, their colour with
relation to the
colour
scheme
of the room (The Art of
Interior Decoration), so jewels
should be
selected
either to complete costumes, or to give
the keynote upon which
a
costume
is built. A woman whose
artist-dressmaker turns out
for her a
marvellous
green gown, would far better
carry out the colour
scheme
with
some semi-precious stones
than insist upon wearing
her priceless rubies.
On
the other hand, granted one
owns rubies and they are
becoming, then plan a
gown
entirely with reference to
them, noting not merely
the shade of their
colour,
but
the character of their setting,
should it be distinctive.
One
of the most picturesque
public events in Vienna each
year, is a bazaar held
for
the
benefit of a charity under
court patronage. To draw the
crowds and induce
them
to
give up their money, it has
always been the custom to
advertise widely that
the
ladies
of the Austro-Hungarian court
would conduct the sale of
articles at the
various
booths and that the said
noble ladies would wear
their family jewels.
Also,
that
there be no danger of confusing the
various celebrities, the
names of those
selling
at each booth would be
posted in plain lettering
over it. Programmes
are
sold,
which also inform patrons as to
the name and station of each
lovely vendor of
flowers
and sweets. It is an extraordinary occasion, and
well worth witnessing
once.
The jewels worn are as
amazing and fascinating as is Hungarian
music. There
is
a barbaric sumptuousness about them, an
elemental quality conveyed by
the
Oriental
combining of stones, which to
the western European and
American, seem
incongruous.
Enormous pearls, regular and
irregular, are set together
in company
with
huge sapphires, emeralds, rubies and
diamonds, cut in the antique
way.
Looking
about, one feels in an Arabian
Nights' dream. On the
particular occasion to
which
we refer, the most beautiful
woman present was the Princess
Metternich, and
in
her jewels decorative as any
woman ever seen.
The
women of the Austrian court,
especially the Hungarian
women, are notably
beautiful
and fascinating as well. It is the
Magyar élan, that abandon
which prompts
a
woman to toss her jewelled
bangle to a Gypsy leader of the
orchestra, when his
violin
moans and flashes out a czardas.
But
the rule remains the
same whether your jewels
are inherited and rich
in
souvenirs
of European courts, or the
last work of Cartier. They
must be a
harmonious
part of a carefully designed
costume, or used with
discretion against a
background
of costumes planned with reference to
making them count as the
sole
decoration.
We
recall a Spanish beauty, representative
of several noble strains,
who was an
artist
in the combining of her gems
as to their class and colour.
Hers was that rare
gift,--infallible
good taste, which led her to
contribute an individual quality to
her
temporary
possessions. She counted in
Madrid, not only as a
beautiful and brilliant
woman,
but as a decorative contribution to
any room she entered. It was
not
uncommon
to meet her at dinner, wearing
some very chic blue
gown, often of
velvet,
the sole decoration of which
would be her sapphires, stones rare
in
themselves,
famous for their colour,
their matching, the manner
in which they were
cut,
and their setting,--the
unique hand-work of some
goldsmith of genius. It is
impossible
to forget her distinguished
appearance as she entered the
room in a
princess
gown, made to show the
outline of her faultless
figure, and cut very
low.
Against
the background of her white
neck and the simple lines of
her blue gown,
the
sapphires became decoration
with artistic restraint,
though they gleamed from
a
coronet
in her soft, black hair,
encircled her neck many
times and fell below
her
waist
line, clasped her arms and
were suspended from her
ears in long,
graceful
pendants.
They adorned her fingers and
they composed a girdle of
indescribable
beauty.
PLATE
XI
MARIE ANTOINETTE IN A PORTRAIT BY
MADAME VIGÉE LE BRUN,
one of the
greatest
portrait painters of the
eighteenth
century.
Here we see the lovely queen
of
Louis
XVI in the type of costume
she made
her
own which is still referred
to as the Marie
Antoinette
style.
This
portrait is in the Musée
National,
Versailles.
Courtesy
of Braun & Co., New York,
London
&
Paris
Bourbon
France Marie Antoinette
Portrait by
Madame
Vigée Le Brun
Later,
the same night, one would
meet this woman at a ball, and
discover that she
had
made a complete change of costume
and was as elegant as before,
but now all
in
red, a gown of deep red
velvet or some wonderful
soft satin, unadorned save
by
her
rubies, as numerous and as unique as
her sapphires had
been.
There
were other women in Madrid
wearing wonderful jewels, one of
them when
going
to court functions always
had a carriage follow hers, in which
were
detectives.
How strange this seems to
Americans! But this
particular woman in no
way
illustrated the point we
would make, for she had lost
control of her own
lines,
had
no knowledge of line and colour in
costume, and when wearing
her jewels,
looked
very much like the
show case of a jeweller's
shop.
Jewelry
must be worn to make lines,
continue or terminate lines, accentuate a
good
physical
point, or hide a bad one.
Remember that a jewel like
any other object
d'art,
is
an ornament, and unless it is ornamental,
and an added attraction to the
wearer, it
is
valueless in a decorative way.
For this reason it is well
to discover, by
experimenting,
what jewelry is your affair,
what kind of rings for
example, are best
suited
to your kind of hands. It
may be that small rings of
delicate workmanship,
set
with colourless gems, will
suit your hands; while
your friend will look better
in
the
larger, heavier sort, set
with stones of deeper
tones.
This
finding out what one can and
cannot wear, from shoe
leather to a feather in
the
hat
(and the inventory includes
even width of hem on a linen
handkerchief), is by
no
means a frivolous, fruitless waste of
time; it is a wise preparedness,
which in the
end
saves time, vitality and
money. And if it does not
make one independent of
expert
advice (and why should one
expect to be that, since technique in
any art
should
improve with practice?) it
certainly prepares one to grasp and make
use of,
expert
suggestions.
We
have often been told, and by
those whose business it is to know
such things,
that
the models created by great
Paris dressmakers are not
always flashes of
genius
which
come in the night, nor
the wilful perversion of an
existing fashion, to
force
the
world of women into
discarding, and buying everything
new. It may look
suspiciously
like it when we see a mere
swing of the pendulum
carrying the straight
sheath
out to the ten-yard limit of
crinoline skirts.
As
a matter of fact, decorative
woman rules the fashions,
and if decorative
woman
makes
up her mind to retain a line
or a limit, she does it.
The open secret is
that
every
great Paris house has its
chic clientele, which in
returning from the
Riviera--
Europe's
Peacock Alley--is full of knowledge as to
how the last fashions
(line and
colour),
succeeded in scoring in the
rôle designated. Those points
found to be
desirable,
becoming, beautiful, comfortable,
appropriate, séduisant--what
you
will--are
taken as the foundation of
the next wardrobe order, and
with this inside
information
from women who know
(know
the subtle distinction
between daring
lines
and colours, which are
good
form, and those
which are not), the
men or
women
who give their lives to
creating costumes proceed to build. These
are the
fashions
for the exclusive few
this year, for the
whole world the next
year.
In
conclusion, to reduce one of the rules as
to how jewels should be worn
to its
simplest
form, never use imitation
pearl trimming if you are
wearing a necklace and
other
ornaments of real pearls.
The pearl trimming may be
very charming in
itself,
but
it lessens the distinction of
your real pearls.
In
the same way rhinestones
may be decidedly decorative,
but only a woman
with
an
artist's instinct can use
her diamonds at the same
time. It can be done, by
keeping
the rhinestones off the
bodice. An artist can conceive and
work out a
perfect
adjustment of what in the
mind and hand of the
inexperienced is not to be
attempted.
Your French dressmaker combines
real and imitation laces in
a
fascinating
manner. That same artist's
instinct could trim a gown
with emerald
pastes
and hang real gems of the
same in the ears, using
brooch and chain, but
you
would
find the green glass
garniture swept from the
proximity of the gems and
used
in
some telling manner to score
as trimming,--not
to compete as jewels. We have
seen
the skirt of French gowns of
black tulle or net, caught
up with great rhinestone
swans,
and at the same time a
diamond chain and diamond
earrings worn.
Nothing
could
have been more
chic.
We
recall another case of the
discreet combining of gems and paste. It
was at the
Spring
races, Longchamps, Paris. The
decorative woman we have
never forgotten,
had
marvellous gold-red hair,
wore a costume of golden
brown chiffon, a close
toque
(to show her hair) of
brown; long topaz drops hung
from her ears, set in
hand
-wrought
Etruscan gold, and her
shell lorgnettes hung from a
topaz chain. Now
note
that on her toque and her
girdle were buckles made of
topaz glass, obviously
not
real topaz and because made
to look like milliner's
garniture and not
jeweler's
work,
they had great style and
were as beautiful of their
kind as the real
stones.
PLATE
XII
The
portrait of an Englishwoman
painted
during
the Napoleonic
period.
She
wears the typical Empire
gown, cloak,
and
bonnet.
The
original of this portrait is
the same
referred
to elsewhere as having moistened
her
muslin
gowns to make them cling to
her, in
Grecian
folds.
Among
her admiring friends was
Lord Byron.
A
descendant who allows the
use of the
charming
portrait, explains that the
fair lady
insisted
upon being painted in her
bonnet
because
her curling locks were
short--a
result
of typhoid fever.
Table of Contents:
|
|||||