|
|||||
Wilney
Street Burford
CHAPTER
V
OLD
CASTLES
Castles
have played a prominent part
in the making of England.
Many towns owe
their
existence to the protecting
guard of an old fortress.
They grew up beneath
its
sheltering
walls like children holding
the gown of their good
mother, though the
castle
often proved but a harsh and
cruel stepmother, and exacted heavy
tribute in
return
for partial security from
pillage and rapine. Thus
Newcastle-upon-Tyne
arose
about the early fortress
erected in 1080 by Robert Curthose to
guard the
passage
of the river at the Pons
Aelii. The poor little
Saxon village of
Monkchester
was
then its neighbour. But
the castle occupying a fine
strategic position soon
attracted
townsfolk, who built their
houses 'neath its shadow.
The town of
Richmond
owes its existence to the
lordly castle which Alain
Rufus, a cousin of
the
Duke
of Brittany, erected on land
granted to him by the
Conqueror. An old
rhyme
tells
how he
Came
out of Brittany
With
his wife Tiffany,
And
his maid Manfras,
And
his dog Hardigras.
He
built his walls of stone. We
must not imagine, however,
that an early Norman
castle
was always a vast keep of stone.
That came later. The
Normans called their
earliest
strongholds mottes,
which consisted of a mound with
stockades and a deep
ditch
and a bailey-court also defended by a ditch and
stockades. Instead of the
great
stone
keep of later days,
"foursquare to every wind
that blew," there was a
wooden
tower
for the shelter of the
garrison. You can see in the
Bayeux tapestry the
followers
of William the Conqueror in
the act of erecting some
such tower of
defence.
Such structures were
somewhat easily erected, and did
not require a long
period
for their construction.
Hence they were very
useful for the holding of
a
conquered
country. Sometimes advantage was taken of
the works that the
Romans
had
left. The Normans made
use of the old stone walls
built by the earliest
conquerors
of Britain. Thus we find at Pevensey a
Norman fortress born within
the
ancient
fortress reared by the
Romans to protect that
portion of the southern
coast
from
the attacks of the northern pirates.
Porchester Keep rose in the time of
the first
Henry
at the north-west angle of
the Roman fort. William I
erected his castle at
Colchester
on the site of the Roman
castrum.
The old Roman wall of
London was
used
by the Conqueror for the
eastern defence of his Tower
that he erected to
keep
in
awe the citizens of the
metropolis, and at Lincoln and Colchester
the works of
the
first conquerors of Britain
were eagerly utilized by
him.
One
of the most important Roman
castles in the country is
Burgh Castle, in North
Suffolk,
with its grand and noble
walls. The late Mr. G.E.
Fox thus described
the
ruins:--
"According
to the plan on the Ordnance
Survey map, the walls
enclose
a
quadrangular area roughly 640
feet long by 413 wide, the
walls being
9
feet thick with a foundation
12 feet in width. The angles of
the
station
are rounded. The eastern
wall is strengthened by four
solid
bastions,
one standing against each of the
rounded angles, the
other
two
intermediate, and the north and
south sides have one each,
neither
of
them being in the centre of
the side, but rather
west of it. The
quaggy
ground between the camp and
the stream would be an
excellent
defence
against sudden attack."
Burgh
Castle
Burgh
Castle, according to the late
Canon Raven, was the
Roman station
Gariannonum
of
the Notitia
Imperii. Its
walls are built of
flint-rubble concrete, and
there
are lacing courses of tiles.
There is no wall on the
west, and Canon Raven
used
to contend that one existed
there but has been
destroyed. But this
conjecture
seems
improbable. That side was
probably defended by the sea,
which has
considerably
receded. Two gates remain,
the principal one being the
east gate,
commanded
by towers a hundred feet
high; while the north is a
postern-gate about
five
feet wide. The Romans
have not left many
traces behind them. Some
coins
have
been found, including a
silver one of Gratian and
some of Constantine.
Here
St.
Furseus, an Irish missionary, is said to
have settled with a colony
of monks,
having
been favourably received by Sigebert,
the ruler of the East
Angles, in 633
A.D.
Burgh Castle is one of the finest
specimens of a Roman fort
which our earliest
conquerors
have left us, and ranks
with Reculver, Richborough, and
Pevensey,
those
strong fortresses which were
erected nearly two thousand
years ago to guard
the
coasts against foreign
foes.
In
early days, ere Norman and
Saxon became a united
people, the castle was
the
sign
of the supremacy of the
conquerors and the subjugation of
the English. It kept
watch
and ward over tumultuous
townsfolk and prevented any
acts of rebellion and
hostility
to their new masters. Thus
London's Tower arose to keep
the turbulent
citizens
in awe as well as to protect
them from foreign foes.
Thus at Norwich the
castle
dominated the town, and
required for its erection
the destruction of over
a
hundred
houses. At Lincoln the Conqueror
destroyed 166 houses in order
to
construct
a strong motte
at
the south-west corner of the
old castrum
in
order to
overawe
the city. Sometimes castles
were erected to protect the
land from foreign
foes.
The fort at Colchester was
intended to resist the Danes if
ever their threatened
invasion
came, and Norwich Castle was
erected quite as much to
drive back the
Scandinavian
hosts as to keep in order the
citizens. Newcastle and Carlisle
were of
strategic
importance for driving back
the Scots, and Lancaster Keep,
traditionally
said
to have been reared by Roger
de Poitou, but probably of
later date, bore the
brunt
of many a marauding invasion. To
check the incursions of the
Welsh, who
made
frequent and powerful
irruptions into Herefordshire,
many castles were
erected
in Shropshire and Herefordshire,
forming a chain of fortresses which
are
more
numerous than in any other
part of England. They are of
every shape and size,
from
stately piles like Wigmore
and Goodrich, to the smallest
fortified farm, like
Urishay
Castle, a house half mansion, half
fortress. Even the church
towers of
Herefordshire,
with their walls seven or
eight feet thick, such as
that at Ewias
Harold,
look as if they were
designed as strongholds in case of need.
On the
western
and northern borders of England we find
the largest number of
fortresses,
erected
to restrain and keep back troublesome
neighbours.
The
story of the English castles
abounds in interest and romance. Most of
them are
ruins
now, but fancy pictures
them in the days of their
splendour, the abodes
of
chivalry
and knightly deeds, of "fair
ladies and brave men," and each one
can tell
its
story of siege and
battle-cries, of strenuous attack
and gallant defence, of
prominent
parts played in the drama of English
history. To some of these we
shall
presently
refer, but it would need a
very large volume to record
the whole story of
our
English fortresses.
We
have said that the
earliest Norman castle was a motte fortified
by a stockade, an
earthwork
protected with timber
palings. That is the latest
theory amongst
antiquaries,
but there are not a
few who maintain that
the Normans, who
proved
themselves
such admirable builders of
the stoutest of stone churches,
would not
long
content themselves with such
poor fortresses. There were stone
castles before
the
Normans, besides the old
Roman walls at Pevensey,
Colchester, London, and
Lincoln.
And there came from
Normandy a monk named Gundulf in 1070
who was
a
mighty builder. He was consecrated
Bishop of Rochester and began to
build his
cathedral
with wondrous architectural
skill. He is credited with
devising a new style
of
military architecture, and found
much favour with the
Conqueror, who at the
time
especially needed strong
walls to guard himself and
his hungry followers.
He
was
ordered by the King to build
the first beginnings of the
Tower of London. He
probably
designed the keep at
Colchester and the castle of
his cathedral town,
and
set
the fashion of building
these great ramparts of stone which
were so serviceable
in
the subjugation and overawing of
the English. The fashion
grew, much to the
displeasure
of the conquered, who deemed
them "homes of wrong and
badges of
bondage,"
hateful places filled with
devils and evil men who
robbed and spoiled
them.
And when they were ordered
to set to work on castle-building
their impotent
wrath
knew no bounds. It is difficult to
ascertain how many were
constructed
during
the Conqueror's reign.
Domesday tells of forty-nine.
Another authority, Mr.
Pearson,
mentions ninety-nine, and Mrs.
Armitage after a careful
examination of
documents
contends for eighty-six. But
there may have been
many others. In
Stephen's
reign castles spread like an
evil sore over the
land. His traitorous
subjects
broke
their allegiance to their
king and preyed upon the
country. The Anglo-Saxon
Chronicle
records
that "every rich man
built his castles and defended
them against
him,
and they filled the land
full of castles. They greatly oppressed
the wretched
people
by making them work at these
castles, and when the castles
were finished
they
filled them with devils and
evil men. Then they
took those whom they
suspected
to have any goods, by night
and by day, seizing both men
and women,
and
they put them in prison
for their gold and silver,
and tortured them with
pains
unspeakable,
for never were any
martyrs tormented as these
were. They hung
some
up
by their feet and smoked them
with foul smoke; some by
their thumbs or by
the
head,
and they hung burning things
on their feet. They put a
knotted string about
their
heads, and twisted it till it
went into the brain.
They put them into
dungeons
wherein
were adders and snakes and toads, and
thus wore them out.
Some they put
into
a crucet-house, that is,
into a chest that was short and
narrow and not deep,
and
they
put sharp stones in it, and
crushed the man therein so
that they broke all
his
limbs.
There were hateful and grim
things called Sachenteges in
many of the
castles,
and which two or three men
had enough to do to carry. The
Sachentege was
made
thus: it was fastened to a beam, having a
sharp iron to go round a man's
throat
and
neck, so that he might
noways sit, nor lie,
nor sleep, but that he must
bear all
the
iron. Many thousands they
exhausted with hunger. I
cannot, and I may not,
tell
of
all the wounds and all
the tortures that they
inflicted upon the wretched
men of
this
land; and this state of
things lasted the nineteen years
that Stephen was king,
and
ever grew worse and worse.
They were continually
levying an exaction
from
the
towns, which they called
Tenserie,18
and
when the miserable
inhabitants had no
more
to give, then plundered they
and burnt all the towns, so
that well mightest
thou
walk a whole day's journey
nor ever shouldest thou
find a man seated in
a
town
or its lands tilled."
More
than a thousand of these
abodes of infamy are said to
have been built.
Possibly
many of them were timber
structures only. Countless
small towns and
villages
boast of once possessing a fortress.
The name Castle Street remains,
though
the actual site of the
stronghold has long
vanished. Sometimes we find a
mound
which seems to proclaim its
position, but memory is
silent, and the
people
of
England, if the story of the
chronicler be true, have to be
grateful to Henry II,
who
set himself to work to root
up and destroy very many of
these adulterine
castles
which were the abodes of
tyranny and oppression. However,
for the
protection
of his kingdom, he raised
other strongholds, in the
south the grand
fortress
of Dover, which still guards
the straits; in the west,
Berkeley Castle, for
his
friend
Robert FitzHarding, ancestor of Lord
Berkeley, which has remained
in the
same
family until the present
day; in the north, Richmond,
Scarborough, and
Newcastle-upon-Tyne;
and in the east, Orford
Keep. The same stern
Norman keep
remains,
but you can see some
changes in the architecture.
The projection of the
buttresses
is increased, and there is some attempt
at ornamentation. Orford Castle,
which
some guide-books and
directories will insist on confusing
with Oxford
Castle
and stating that it was built by
Robert D'Oiley in 1072, was
erected by
Henry
II to defend the country against
the incursions of the
Flemings and to
safeguard
Orford Haven. Caen stone was
brought for the stone
dressings to
windows
and doors, parapets and groins, but
masses of septaria found on
the shore
and
in the neighbouring marshes
were utilized with such good
effect that the
walls
have
stood the attacks of besiegers and
weathered the storms of the
east coast for
more
than seven centuries. It was built in a
new fashion that was made in
France,
and
to which our English eyes
were unaccustomed, and is somewhat
similar in plan
to
Conisborough Castle, in the valley of
the Don. The plan is
circular with three
projecting
towers, and the keep was
protected by two circular
ditches, one fifteen
feet
and the other thirty feet
distant from its walls.
Between the two ditches
was a
circular
wall with parapet and
battlements. The interior of
the castle was divided
into
three floors; the towers,
exclusive of the turrets, had
five, two of which
were
entresols,
and were ninety-six feet
high, the central keep
being seventy feet.19
The
oven
was at the top of the keep.
The chapel is one of the
most interesting chambers,
with
its original altar still in
position, though much
damaged, and also
piscina,
aumbrey,
and ciborium. This castle
nearly vanished with other
features of
vanishing
England in the middle of the
eighteenth century, Lord
Hereford
proposing
to pull it down for the
sake of the material; but
"it being a necessary
sea-
mark,
especially for ships coming
from Holland, who by
steering so as to make the
castle
cover or hide the church
thereby avoid a dangerous sandbank called
the
Whiting,
Government interfered and prevented
the destruction of the
building."20
In
these keeps the thickness of
the walls enabled them to
contain chambers, stairs,
and
passages. At Guildford there is an
oratory with rude carvings
of sacred
subjects,
including a crucifixion. The
first and second floors were
usually vaulted,
and
the upper ones were of
timber. Fireplaces were built in
most of the rooms,
and
some
sort of domestic comfort was
not altogether forgotten. In
the earlier fortresses
the
walls of the keep enclosed an
inner court, which had rooms
built up to the great
stone
walls, the court afterwards
being vaulted and floors erected. In
order to
protect
the entrance there were
heavy doors with a portcullis, and by
degrees the
outward
defences were strengthened.
There was an outer bailey or
court surrounded
by
a strong wall, with a
barbican guarding the
entrance, consisting of a strong
gate
protected
by two towers. In this lower
or outer court are the
stables, and the mound
where
the lord of the castle
dispenses justice, and where
criminals and traitors
are
executed.
Another strong gateway
flanked by towers protects the
inner bailey, on
the
edge of which stands the
keep, which frowns down upon
us as we enter. An
immense
household was supported in these castles.
Not only were there
men-at-
arms,
but also cooks, bakers, brewers,
tailors, carpenters, smiths, masons, and
all
kinds
of craftsmen; and all this
crowd of workers had to be provided
with
accommodation
by the lord of the castle.
Hence a building in the form
of a large
hall
was erected, sometimes of stone, usually of wood, in
the lower or upper
bailey,
for
these soldiers and artisans, where
they slept and had their
meals.
Amongst
other castles which arose
during this late Norman
and early English
period
of architecture we may mention
Barnard Castle, a mighty stronghold,
held
by
the royal house of Balliol,
the Prince Bishops of
Durham, the Earls of
Warwick,
the
Nevilles, and other powerful
families. Sir Walter Scott
immortalized the Castle
in
Rokeby.
Here is his description of
the fortress:--
High
crowned he sits, in dawning pale,
The
sovereign of the lovely
vale.
What
prospects from the
watch-tower high
Gleam
gradual on the warder's
eye?
Far
sweeping to the east he
sees
Down
his deep woods the course of
Tees,
And
tracks his wanderings by the
steam
Of
summer vapours from the
stream;
And
ere he pace his destined
hour
By
Brackenbury's dungeon
tower,
These
silver mists shall melt
away
And
dew the woods with
glittering spray.
Then
in broad lustre shall be
shown
That
mighty trench of living
stone.
And
each huge trunk that
from the side,
Reclines
him o'er the darksome
tide,
Where
Tees, full many a fathom
low,
Wears
with his rage no common
foe;
Nor
pebbly bank, nor sand-bed
here,
Nor
clay-mound checks his fierce
career,
Condemned
to mine a channelled
way
O'er
solid sheets of marble
grey.
This
lordly pile has seen
the Balliols fighting with
the Scots, of whom John
Balliol
became
king, the fierce contests
between the warlike prelates of
Durham and
Barnard's
lord, the triumph of the
former, who were deprived of
their conquest by
Edward
I, and then its surrender in
later times to the rebels of
Queen Elizabeth.
Another
northern border castle is Norham,
the possession of the Bishop
of Durham,
built
during this period. It was a
mighty fortress, and witnessed
the gorgeous scene
of
the arbitration between the
rival claimants to the
Scottish throne, the
arbiter
being
King Edward I of England,
who forgot not to assert
his own fancied rights
to
the
overlordship of the northern
kingdom. It was, however,
besieged by the Scots,
and
valiant deeds were wrought
before its walls by Sir
William Marmion and
Sir
Thomas
Grey, but the Scots
captured it in 1327 and again in 1513. It is
now but a
battered
ruin. Prudhoe, with its
memories of border wars, and
Castle Rising,
redolent
with the memories of the
last years of the wicked
widow of Edward II,
belong
to this age of castle-architecture, and
also the older portions of
Kenilworth.
Pontefract
Castle, the last fortress
that held out for
King Charles in the Civil
War,
and
in consequence slighted and ruined, can
tell of many dark deeds and
strange
events
in English history. The De
Lacys built it in the early
part of the
thirteenth
century.
Its area was seven acres.
The wall of the castle court
was high and flanked
by
seven towers; a deep moat was
cut on the western side,
where was the
barbican
and
drawbridge. It had terrible dungeons, one
a room twenty-five feet
square,
without
any entrance save a
trap-door in the floor of a
turret. The castle passed,
in
1310,
by marriage to Thomas Earl of
Lancaster, who took part in
the strife between
Edward
II and his nobles, was
captured, and in his own
hall condemned to
death.
The
castle is always associated with
the murder of Richard II,
but contemporary
historians,
Thomas of Walsingham and Gower
the poet, assert that he
starved
himself
to death; others contend
that his starvation was
not voluntary; while
there
are
not wanting those who say
that he escaped to Scotland,
lived there many
years,
and
died in peace in the castle of Stirling,
an honoured guest of Robert III of
Scotland,
in 1419. I have not seen
the entries, but I am told
in the accounts of
the
Chamberlain
of Scotland there are items
for the maintenance of the
King for eleven
years.
But popular tales die hard, and
doubtless you will hear the groans
and see the
ghost
of the wronged Richard some
moonlight night in the
ruined keep of
Pontefract.
He has many companion
ghosts--the Earl of Salisbury,
Richard Duke
of
York, Anthony Wydeville,
Earl Rivers and Grey his
brother, and Sir
Thomas
Vaughan,
whose feet trod the
way to the block, that was
worn hard by many
victims.
The dying days of the old
castle made it illustrious. It was
besieged three
times,
taken and retaken, and saw
amazing scenes of gallantry and
bravery. It held
out
until after the death of the
martyr king; it heard the
proclamation of Charles II,
but
at length was compelled to surrender,
and "the strongest inland
garrison in the
kingdom,"
as Oliver Cromwell termed
it, was slighted and made a
ruin. Its sister
fortress
Knaresborough shared its
fate. Lord Lytton, in
Eugene
Aram, wrote of
it:--
"You
will be at a loss to recognise now the
truth of old Leland's
description
of that once stout and gallant
bulwark of the north,
when
'he
numbrid 11 or 12 Toures in the
walles of the Castel, and one
very
fayre
beside in the second area.'
In that castle the four
knightly
murderers
of the haughty Becket (the
Wolsey of his age) remained
for
a
whole year, defying the
weak justice of the times.
There, too, the
unfortunate
Richard II passed some
portion of his bitter
imprisonment.
And
there, after the battle of
Marston Moor, waved the
banner of the
loyalists
against the soldiers of
Lilburn."
An
interesting story is told of
the siege. A youth, whose
father was in the
garrison,
each
night went into the
deep, dry moat, climbed up
the glacis, and put
provisions
through
a hole where his father
stood ready to receive them. He was
seen at length,
fired
on by the Parliamentary soldiers, and
sentenced to be hanged in sight of
the
besieged
as a warning to others. But a good
lady obtained his respite, and
after the
conquest
of the place was released.
The castle then, once the
residence of Piers
Gaveston,
of Henry III, and of John of
Gaunt, was dismantled and
destroyed.
During
the reign of Henry III great
progress was made in the
improvement and
development
of castle-building. The comfort and
convenience of the dwellers
in
these
fortresses were considered, and if not
very luxurious places they
were made
more
beautiful by art and more desirable as
residences. During the
reigns of the
Edwards
this progress continued, and
a new type of castle was introduced.
The
stern,
massive, and high-towering keep was
abandoned, and the
fortifications
arranged
in a concentric fashion. A fine
hall with kitchens occupied
the centre of
the
fortress; a large number of chambers
were added. The stronghold
itself
consisted
of a large square or oblong
like that at Donnington,
Berkshire, and the
approach
was carefully guarded by strong gateways,
advanced works, walled
galleries,
and barbicans. Deep moats filled with
water increased their
strength and
improved
their beauty.
We
will give some examples of
these Edwardian castles, of which
Leeds Castle,
Kent,
is a fine specimen. It stands on three
islands in a sheet of water
about fifteen
acres
in extent, these islands
being connected in former times by
double
drawbridges.
It consists of two huge piles of
buildings which with a
strong gate-
house
and barbican form four
distinct forts, capable of
separate defence should
any
one
or other fall into the hands
of an enemy. Three causeways, each
with its
drawbridge,
gate, and portcullis, lead to the
smallest island or inner
barbican, a
fortified
mill contributing to the defences. A
stone bridge connects this
island with
the
main island. There stands
the Constable's Tower, and a stone wall
surrounds the
island
and within is the modern
mansion. The Maiden's Tower
and the Water
Tower
defend the island on the
south. A two-storeyed building on
arches now
connects
the main island with
the Tower of the Gloriette,
which has a curious
old
bell
with the Virgin and Child,
St. George and the Dragon, and
the Crucifixion
depicted
on it, and an ancient clock.
The castle withstood a siege in
the time of
Edward
II because Queen Isabella was
refused admission. The King
hung the
Governor,
Thomas de Colepepper, by the
chain of the drawbridge.
Henry IV retired
here
on account of the Plague in London, and
his second wife, Joan of
Navarre, was
imprisoned
here. It was a favourite residence of
the Court in the fourteenth
and
fifteenth
centuries. Here the wife of
Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, was
tried for
witchcraft.
Dutch prisoners were
confined here in 1666 and contrived to
set fire to
some
of the buildings. It is the
home of the Wykeham Martin
family, and is one of
the
most picturesque castles in
the country.
In
the same neighbourhood is
Allington Castle, an ivy-mantled ruin,
another
example
of vanished glory, only two
tenements occupying the
princely residence of
the
Wyatts, famous in the
history of State and
Letters. Sir Henry, the
father of the
poet,
felt the power of the
Hunchback Richard, and was racked and
imprisoned in
Scotland,
and would have died in the
Tower of London but for a
cat. He rose to
great
honour under Henry VII, and here
entertained the King in great
style. At
Allington
the poet Sir Thomas Wyatt
was born, and spent his days in
writing prose
and
verse, hunting and hawking, and
occasionally dallying after
Mistress Anne
Boleyn
at the neighbouring castle of Hever. He
died here in 1542, and his
son Sir
Thomas
led the insurrection against
Queen Mary and sealed the
fate of himself and
his
race.
Hever
Castle, to which allusion has
been made, is an example of
the transition
between
the old fortress and
the more comfortable mansion
of a country squire or
magnate.
Times were less dangerous,
the country more peaceful
when Sir Geoffrey
Boleyn
transformed and rebuilt the castle
built in the reign of Edward
III by
William
de Hever, but the strong
entrance-gate flanked by towers,
embattled and
machicolated,
and defended by stout doors and three
portcullises and the
surrounding
moat, shows that the
need of defence had not quite
passed away. The
gates
lead into a courtyard around
which the hall, chapel, and
domestic chambers
are
grouped. The long gallery
Anne Boleyn so often
traversed with impatience
still
seems
to re-echo her steps, and
her bedchamber, which used
to contain some of
the
original
furniture, has always a
pathetic interest. The story
of the courtship of
Henry
VIII with "the brown girl
with a perthroat and an
extra finger," as
Margaret
More
described her, is well
known. Her old home,
which was much in decay,
has
passed
into the possession of a
wealthy American gentleman, and
has been recently
greatly
restored and transformed.
Sussex
can boast of many a lordly castle, and in
its day Bodiam must
have been
very
magnificent. Even in its decay
and ruin it is one of the
most beautiful in
England.
It combined the palace of
the feudal lord and
the fortress of a knight.
The
founder,
Sir John Dalyngrudge, was a
gallant soldier in the wars
of Edward III, and
spent
most of his best years in France,
where he had doubtless learned
the art of
making
his house comfortable as well as secure.
He acquired licence to fortify
his
castle
in 1385 "for resistance against our
enemies." There was need of strong
walls,
as
the French often at that
period ravaged the coast of Sussex,
burning towns and
manor-houses.
Clark, the great authority on castles,
says that "Bodiam is
a
complete
and typical castle of the end of the
fourteenth century, laid out
entirely on
a
new site, and constructed after one
design and at one period. It but
seldom
happens
that a great fortress is wholly
original, of one, and that a
known, date, and
so
completely free from
alterations or additions." It is nearly
square, with circular
tower
sixty-five feet high at the
four corners, connected by embattled
curtain-walls,
in
the centre of each of which
square towers rise to an equal
height with the
circular.
The gateway is a large
structure composed of two
flanking towers
defended
by numerous oiletts for
arrows, embattled parapets,
and deep
machicolations.
Over the gateway are
three shields bearing the
arms of Bodiam,
Dalyngrudge,
and Wardieu. A huge portcullis
still frowns down upon
us, and two
others
opposed the way, while above
are openings in the vault
through which
melted
lead, heated sand, pitch, and
other disagreeable things
could be poured on
the
heads of the foe. In the
courtyard on the south
stands the great hall with
its
oriel,
buttery, and kitchen, and amidst
the ruins you can
discern the chapel,
sacristy,
ladies'
bower, presence chamber. The
castle stayed not long in the
family of the
builder,
his son John probably
perishing in the wars, and
passed to Sir Thomas
Lewknor,
who opposed Richard III, and was
therefore attainted of high treason
and
his
castle besieged and taken. It was restored to
him again by Henry VII, but
the
Lewknors
never resided there again.
Waller destroyed it after
the capture of
Arundel,
and since that time it has
been left a prey to the
rains and frosts and
storms,
but manages to preserve much of
its beauty, and to tell
how noble knights
lived
in the days of chivalry.
Caister
Castle
Caister
Castle is one of the four principal
castles in Norfolk. It is built of
brick, and
is
one of the earliest edifices in
England constructed of that
material after its
rediscovery
as suitable for building purposes. It
stands with its strong
defences not
far
from the sea on the
barren coast. It was built by Sir
John Fastolfe, who
fought
with
great distinction in the French
wars of Henry V and Henry
VI, and was the
hero
of the Battle of the
Herrings in 1428, when he
defeated the French
and
succeeded
in convoying a load of herrings in
triumph to the English camp
before
Orleans.
It is supposed that he was the
prototype of Shakespeare's Falstaff,
but
beyond
the resemblance in the names
there is little similarity in
the exploits of the
two
"heroes." Sir John Fastolfe,
much to the chagrin of other
friends and relatives,
made
John Paston his heir,
who became a great and prosperous man,
represented
his
county in Parliament, and
was a favourite of Edward IV.
Paston loved Caister,
his
"fair jewell"; but
misfortunes befell him. He had great
losses, and was thrice
confined
in the Fleet Prison and then
outlawed. Those were dangerous
days, and
friends
often quarrelled. Hence
during his troubles the
Duke of Norfolk and
Lord
Scales
tried to get possession of Caister, and
after his death laid siege
to it. The
Pastons
lacked not courage and determination, and
defended it for a year, but
were
then
forced to surrender. However, it was
restored to them, but again forcibly
taken
from
them. However, not by the
sword but by negotiations and
legal efforts, Sir
John
again gained his own, and an embattled
tower at the north-west
corner, one
hundred
feet high, and the north and
west walls remain to tell
the story of this
brave
old
Norfolk family, who by their
Letters
have
done so much to guide us through
the
dark
period to which they
relate.
Defaced
Arms. Taunton Castle
We
will journey to the West
Country, a region of castles. The Saxons
were obliged
to
erect their rude earthen
strongholds to keep back the
turbulent Welsh, and
these
were
succeeded by Norman keeps.
Monmouthshire is famous for
its castles. Out of
the
thousand erected in Norman
times twenty-five were built
in that county. There
is
Chepstow Castle with its
Early Norman gateway spanned
by a circular arch
flanked
by round towers. In the
inner court there are
gardens and ruins of a
grand
hall,
and in the outer the remains
of a chapel with evidences of beautifully
groined
vaulting,
and also a winding staircase leading to
the battlements. In the
dungeon of
the
old keep at the south-east
corner of the inner court
Roger de Britolio, Earl
of
Hereford,
was imprisoned for rebellion
against the Conqueror, and in later
times
Henry
Martin, the regicide,
lingered as a prisoner for
thirty years, employing
his
enforced
leisure in writing a book in
order to prove that it is
not right for a man
to
be
governed by one wife. Then
there is Glosmont Castle, the
fortified residence of
the
Earl of Lancaster; Skenfrith Castle,
White Castle, the Album
Castrum of
the
Latin
records, the Landreilo of the
Welsh, with its six
towers, portcullis and
drawbridge
flanked by massive towers, barbican, and
other outworks; and
Raglan
Castle
with its splendid gateway,
its Elizabethan banqueting-hall
ornamented with
rich
stone tracery, its bowling-green, garden
terraces, and spacious courts--an
ideal
place
for knightly tournaments.
Raglan is associated with
the gallant defence of
the
castle
by the Marquis of Worcester in
the Civil War.
Another
famous siege is connected
with the old castle of
Taunton. Taunton was a
noted
place in Saxon days, and the
castle is the earliest English
fortress by some
two
hundred years of which we have
any written historical
record.21
The
Anglo-
Saxon
chronicler states, under the
date 722 A.D.: "This year
Queen Ethelburge
overthrew
Taunton, which Ina had
before built." The buildings
tell their story. We
see
a Norman keep built to the
westward of Ina's earthwork,
probably by Henry de
Blois,
Bishop of Winchester, the
warlike brother of King Stephen.
The gatehouse
with
the curtain ending in drum
towers, of which one only
remains, was first
built
at
the close of the thirteenth
century under Edward I; but
it was restored with
Perpendicular
additions by Bishop Thomas
Langton, whose arms with the
date
1495
may be seen on the
escutcheon above the arch.
Probably Bishop Langton
also
built
the great hall; whilst
Bishop Home, who is sometimes
credited with this
work,
most
likely only repaired the
hall, but tacked on to it the
southward structure on
pilasters,
which shows his arms with
the date 1577. The hall of
the castle was for a
long
period used as Assize
Courts. The castle was purchased by the
Taunton and
Somerset
Archæological Society, and is
now most appropriately a
museum.
Taunton
has seen many strange
sights. The town was owned
by the Bishop of
Winchester,
and the castle had its
constable, an office held by
many great men.
When
Lord Daubeney of Barrington
Court was constable in 1497 Taunton
saw
thousands
of gaunt Cornishmen marching on to
London to protest against the
king's
subsidy,
and they aroused the
sympathy of the kind-hearted
Somerset folk, who
fed
them,
and were afterwards fined
for "aiding and comforting"
them. Again, crowds
of
Cornishmen here flocked to the standard
of Perkin Warbeck. The
gallant defence
of
Taunton by Robert Blake,
aided by the townsfolk, against
the whole force of
the
Royalists,
is a matter of history, and also the
rebellion of Monmouth, who
made
Taunton
his head-quarters. This castle,
like every other one in
England, has much
to
tell us of the chief events
in our national
annals.
In
the principality of Wales we
find many noted strong
holds--Conway, Harlech,
and
many others. Carnarvon Castle,
the repair of which is being
undertaken by Sir
John
Puleston, has no rival among
our medieval fortresses for
the grandeur and
extent
of the ruins. It was commenced
about 1283 by Edward I, but
took forty years
to
complete. In 1295 a playful North
Walian, named Madoc, who was
an
illegitimate
son of Prince David, took
the rising stronghold by
surprise upon a fair
day,
massacred the entire
garrison, and hanged the
constable from his own
half-
finished
walls. Sir John Puleston,
the present constable, though he
derives his
patronymic
from the "base, bloody,
and brutal Saxon," is really
a warmly patriotic
Welshman,
and is doing a good work in preserving
the ruins of the fortress
of
which
he is the titular
governor.
We
should like to record the
romantic stories that have
woven themselves
around
each
crumbling keep and bailey-court, to
see them in the days of
their glory when
warders
kept the gate and watching
archers guarded the wall, and the
lord and lady
and
their knights and esquires
dined in the great hall, and
knights practised feats of
arms
in the tilting-ground, and the
banner of the lord waved
over the battlements,
and
everything was ready for
war or sport, hunting or
hawking. But all the
glories
of
most of the castles of
England have vanished, and
naught is to be seen but
ruined
walls
and deserted halls. Some few
have survived and become
royal palaces or
noblemen's
mansions. Such are Windsor,
Warwick, Raby, Alnwick, and
Arundel,
but
the fate of most of them is
very similar. The old
fortress aimed at being
impregnable
in the days of bows and arrows;
but the progress of guns and
artillery
somewhat
changed the ideas with regard to
their security. In the
struggle between
Yorkists
and Lancastrians many a noble
owner lost his castle and
his head. Edward
IV
thinned down castle-ownership, and
many a fine fortress was
left to die. When
the
Spaniards threatened our shores those
who possessed castles tried
to adapt them
for
the use of artillery, and
when the Civil War
began many of them
were
strengthened
and fortified and often made
gallant defences against their
enemies,
such
as Donnington, Colchester, Scarborough,
and Pontefract. When the
Civil War
ended
the last bugle sounded the
signal for their
destruction. Orders were
issued for
their
destruction, lest they
should ever again be thorns in
the sides of the
Parliamentary
army. Sometimes they were
destroyed for revenge, or
because of
their
materials, which were sold
for the benefit of the
Government or for the
satisfaction
of private greed. Lead was torn
from the roofs of chapels
and
banqueting-halls.
The massive walls were so
strong that they resisted to
the last and
had
to be demolished with the
aid of gunpowder. They
became convenient
quarries
for
stone and furnished many a
farm, cottage and manor-house
with materials for
their
construction. Henceforth the
old castle became a ruin. In
its silent marshy
moat
reeds and rushes grow, and ivy covers
its walls, and trees have
sprung up in
the
quiet and deserted courts.
Picnic parties encamp on the green sward,
and
excursionists
amuse themselves in strolling
along the walls and
wonder why they
were
built so thick, and imagine
that the castle was always a
ruin erected for
the
amusement
of the cheap-tripper for
jest and playground. Happily
care is usually
bestowed
upon the relics that
remain, and diligent
antiquaries excavate and try
to
rear
in imagination the stately
buildings. Some have been
fortunate enough to
become
museums, and some modernized
and restored are private residences.
The
English
castle recalls some of the
most eventful scenes in
English history, and
its
bones
and skeleton should be treated with
respect and veneration as an
important
feature
of vanishing
England.
Table of Contents:
|
|||||