|
|||||
CHAPTER
II
THE
DISAPPEARANCE OF ENGLAND
Under
this alarming heading, "The
Disappearance of England," the
Gaulois
recently
published an article by M. Guy Dorval on
the erosion of the
English
coasts.
The writer refers to the
predictions of certain British
men of science that
England
will one day disappear altogether beneath
the waves, and imagines
that we
British
folk are seized by a popular
panic. Our neighbours are
trembling for the
fate
of
the entente
cordiale, which
would speedily vanish with
vanishing England;
but
they
have been assured by some of
their savants that the rate of
erosion is only one
kilometre
in a thousand years, and that
the danger of total extinction is
somewhat
remote.
Professor Stanislas Meunier, however,
declares that our "panic" is
based on
scientific
facts. He tells us that the
cliffs of Brighton are now
one kilometre farther
away
from the French coast
than in the days of Queen
Elizabeth, and that those of
Kent
are six kilometres farther
away than in the Roman
period. He compares
our
island
to a large piece of sugar in water,
but we may rest assured that
before we
disappear
beneath the waves the period
which must elapse would be
greater than
the
longest civilizations known in
history. So we may hope to be able to
sing "Rule
Britannia"
for many a long
year.
Coast
erosion is, however, a serious
problem, and has caused the
destruction of
many
a fair town and noble forest
that now lie beneath the
seas, and the
crumbling
cliffs
on our eastern shore threaten to
destroy many a village
church and smiling
pasture.
Fishermen tell you that
when storms rage and the
waves swell they
have
heard
the bells chiming in the
towers long covered by the
seas, and nigh the
picturesque
village of Bosham we were
told of a stretch of sea
that was called the
Park.
This as late as the days of
Henry VIII was a favourite royal
hunting forest,
wherein
stags and fawns and does
disported themselves; now
fish are the only
prey
that
can be slain therein.
The
Royal Commission on coast
erosion relieves our minds
somewhat by assuring
us
that although the sea gains
upon the land in many
places, the land gains upon
the
sea
in others, and that the loss and
gain are more or less
balanced. As a matter of
area
this is true. Most of the
land that has been
rescued from the pitiless
sea is
below
high-water mark, and is protected by
artificial banks. This work
of
reclaiming
land can, of course, only be
accomplished in sheltered places,
for
example,
in the great flat bordering
the Wash, which flat is
formed by the deposit
of
the rivers of the Fenland,
and the seaward face of this
region is gradually
being
pushed
forward by the careful
processes of enclosure. You can see
the various old
sea
walls which have been
constructed from Roman times
onward. Some
accretions
of
land have occurred where
the sea piles up masses of
shingle, unless
foolish
people
cart away the shingle in
such quantities that the
waves again assert
themselves.
Sometimes sand silts up as at Southport
in Lancashire, where there
is
the
second longest pier in
England, a mile in length,
from the end of which it is
said
that
on a clear day with a
powerful telescope you may
perchance see the sea, that
a
distinguished
traveller accustomed to the deserts of
Sahara once found it, and
that
the
name Southport is altogether a misnomer,
as it is in the north and there is
no
port
at all.
But
however much as an Englishman I
might rejoice that the
actual area of "our
tight
little island," which after
all is not very tight,
should not be diminishing,
it
would
be a poor consolation to me, if I
possessed land and houses on
the coast of
Norfolk
which were fast slipping
into the sea, to know
that in the Fenland
industrious
farmers were adding to their
acres. And day by day,
year by year, this
destruction
is going on, and the gradual
melting away of land. The
attack is not
always
persistent. It is intermittent. Sometimes
the progress of the sea
seems to be
stayed,
and then a violent storm
arises and falling cliffs and submerged
houses
proclaim
the sway of the relentless
waves. We find that the
greatest loss has
occurred
on the east and southern
coasts of our island. Great
damage has been
wrought
all along the Yorkshire
sea-board from Bridlington to
Kilnsea, and the
following
districts have been the
greatest sufferers: between
Cromer and
Happisburgh,
Norfolk; between Pakefield
and Southwold, Suffolk;
Hampton and
Herne
Bay, and then St.
Margaret's Bay, near Dover;
the coast of Sussex, east
of
Brighton,
and the Isle of Wight; the
region of Bournemouth and Poole;
Lyme Bay,
Dorset,
and Bridgwater Bay, Somerset.
All
along the coast from
Yarmouth to Eastbourne, with a
few exceptional parts, we
find
that the sea is gaining on
the land by leaps and
bounds. It is a coast that is
most
favourably
constructed for coast
erosion. There are no hard
or firm rocks, no
cliffs
high
enough to give rise to a respectable
landslip; the soil is
composed of loose
sand
and gravels, loams and
clays, nothing to resist the assaults of
atmospheric
action
from above or the sea below.
At Covehithe, on the Suffolk
coast, there has
been
the greatest loss of land. In 1887
sixty feet was claimed by
the sea, and in
ten
years
(1878-87) the loss was at
the rate of over eighteen
feet a year. In 1895
another
heavy loss occurred between
Southwold and Covehithe and a new
cove
formed.
Easton Bavent has entirely
disappeared, and so have the once
prosperous
villages
of Covehithe, Burgh-next-Walton, and
Newton-by-Corton, and the
same
fate
seems to be awaiting Pakefield,
Southwold, and other
coast-lying towns.
Easton
Bavent once had such a flourishing
fishery that it paid an annual
rent of
3110
herrings; and millions of herrings
must have been caught by
the fishermen of
disappeared
Dunwich, which we shall
visit presently, as they paid
annually "fish-
fare"
to the clergy of the town
15,377 herrings, besides 70,000 to
the royal treasury.
The
summer visitors to the pleasant
watering-place Felixstowe, named after
St.
Felix,
who converted the East
Anglians to Christianity and was their
first bishop,
that
being the place where the
monks of the priory of St.
Felix in Walton held
their
annual
fair, seldom reflect that
the old Saxon burgh
was carried away as long
ago
as
1100 A.D. Hence Earl
Bigot was compelled to retire
inland and erect his
famous
castle
at Walton. But the sea
respected not the proud
walls of the baron's
stronghold;
the strong masonry that
girt the keep lies beneath
the waves; a heap of
stones,
called by the rustics Stone
Works, alone marks the site
of this once
powerful
castle. Two centuries later the baron's
marsh was destroyed by the
sea,
and
eighty acres of land was
lost, much to the regret of
the monks, who were
thus
deprived
of the rent and tithe
corn.
The
old chroniclers record many
dread visitations of the
relentless foe. Thus
in
1237
we read: "The sea burst with
high tides and tempests of winds,
marsh
countries
near the sea were flooded,
herds and flocks perished, and no
small
number
of men were lost and
drowned. The sea rose
continually for two days
and
one
night." Again in 1251: "On
Christmas night there was a
great thunder and
lightning
in Suffolk; the sea caused
heavy floods." In much later
times Defoe
records:
"Aldeburgh has two streets,
each near a mile long, but
its breadth, which
was
more considerable formerly, is not
proportionable, and the sea
has of late years
swallowed
up one whole street." It has
still standing close to the shore
its quaint
picturesque
town hall, erected in the
fifteenth century. Southwold is
now practically
an
island, bounded on the east
by the sea, on the
south-west by the Blyth
River, on
the
north-west by Buss Creek. It is only
joined to the mainland by a
narrow neck of
shingle
that divides Buss Creek from
the sea. I think that I
should prefer to hold
property
in a more secure region. You
invest your savings in
stock, and dividends
decrease
and your capital grows
smaller, but you usually
have something left.
But
when
your land and houses
vanish entirely beneath the
waves, the chapter is
ended
and
you have no further remedy
except to sue Father
Neptune, who has rather
a
wide
beat and may be difficult to
find when he is wanted to be served
with a
summons.
But
the Suffolk coast does
not show all loss. In
the north much land
has been
gained
in the region of Beccles, which was at
one time close to the sea, and one
of
the
finest spreads of shingle in
England extends from
Aideburgh to Bawdry.
This
shingle
has silted up many a Suffolk
port, but it has proved a
very effectual
barrier
against
the inroads of the sea.
Norden's map of the coast
made in 16012
shows
this
wonderful
mass of shingle, which has
greatly increased since Norden's
day. It has
been
growing in a southerly direction,
until the Aide River had
until recently an
estuary
ten miles in length. But in
1907 the sea asserted
itself, and "burst
through
the
stony barrier, making a
passage for the exit of
the river one mile further
north,
and
leaving a vast stretch of
shingle and two deserted
river-channels as a protection
to
the Marshes of Hollesley
from further inroads of the
sea."3
Formerly
the River
Alde
flowed direct to the sea
just south of the town of
Aldeburgh. Perhaps
some
day
it may be able to again force a passage
near its ancient course or by
Havergate
Island.
This alteration in the course of
rivers is very remarkable, and
may be
observed
at Christ Church,
Hants.
It
is pathetic to think of the
historic churches, beautiful
villages, and smiling
pastures
that have been swept
away by the relentless sea.
There are no less
than
twelve
towns and villages in Yorkshire
that have been thus
buried, and five in
Suffolk.
Ravensburgh, in the former
county, was once a flourishing seaport.
Here
landed
Henry IV in 1399, and Edward IV in
1471. It returned two members
to
Parliament.
An old picture of the place
shows the church, a large
cross, and houses;
but
it has vanished with the
neighbouring villages of Redmare,
Tharlethorp,
Frismarch,
and Potterfleet, and "left not a
wrack behind." Leland
mentions it in
1538,
after which time its place
in history and on the map knows it no
more. The
ancient
church of Kilnsea lost half
its fabric in 1826, and the
rest followed in 1831.
Alborough
Church and the Castle of Grimston
have entirely vanished.
Mapleton
Church
was formerly two miles from
the sea; it is now on a
cliff with the sea at
its
feet,
awaiting the final attack of
the all-devouring enemy.
Nearly a century ago
Owthorne
Church and churchyard were
overwhelmed, and the shore was
strewn
with
ruins and shattered coffins. On the
Tyneside the destruction has
been
remarkable
and rapid. In the district of
Saltworks there was a house built
standing
on
the cliff, but it was never
finished, and fell a prey to
the waves. At Percy
Square
an
inn and two cottages
have been destroyed. The
edge of the cliff in 1827
was
eighty
feet seaward, and the banks of Percy
Square receded a hundred and
eighty
feet
between the years 1827 and
1892. Altogether four acres
have disappeared. An
old
Roman building, locally
known as "Gingling Geordie's Hole," and
large masses
of
the Castle Cliff fell into
the sea in the 'eighties.
The remains of the
once
flourishing
town of Seaton, on the Durham coast,
can be discovered amid the
sands
at
low tide. The modern
village has sunk inland, and
cannot now boast of
an
ancient
chapel dedicated to St.
Thomas of Canterbury, which
has been devoured by
the
waves.
Skegness,
on the Lincolnshire coast, was a large
and important town; it boasted of
a
castle
with strong fortifications and a
church with a lofty spire;
it now lies deep
beneath
the devouring sea, which no
guarding walls could
conquer. Far out at
sea,
beneath
the waves, lies old
Cromer Church, and when
storms rage its bells
are said
to
chime. The churchyard
wherein was written the
pathetic ballad "The Garden
of
Sleep"
is gradually disappearing, and "the graves of
the fair women that
sleep by
the
cliffs by the sea" have
been outraged, and their
bodies scattered and
devoured
by
the pitiless waves.
One
of the greatest prizes of
the sea is the ancient
city of Dunwich, which
dates
back
to the Roman era. The
Domesday Survey shows that
it was then a
considerable
town having 236 burgesses. It was
girt with strong walls; it
possessed
an
episcopal palace, the seat of
the East Anglian bishopric;
it had (so Stow
asserts)
fifty-two
churches, a monastery, brazen
gates, a town hall,
hospitals, and the
dignity
of possessing a mint. Stow
tells of its departed
glories, its royal
and
episcopal
palaces, the sumptuous
mansion of the mayor, its
numerous churches and
its
windmills, its harbour
crowded with shipping, which
sent forth forty vessels
for
the
king's service in the
thirteenth century. Though
Dunwich was an important
place,
Stow's description of it is rather
exaggerated. It could never have had
more
than
ten churches and monasteries. Its
"brazen gates" are mythical,
though it had its
Lepers'
Gate, South Gate, and others. It was once
a thriving city of
wealthy
merchants
and industrious fishermen. King
John granted to it a charter. It
suffered
from
the attacks of armed men as well as
from the ravages of the
sea. Earl Bigot
and
the revolting barons besieged it in
the reign of Edward I. Its
decay was gradual.
In
1342, in the parish of St.
Nicholas, out of three
hundred houses only
eighteen
remained.
Only seven out of a hundred
houses were standing in the
parish of St.
Martin.
St. Peter's parish was
devastated and depopulated. It had a
small round
church,
like that at Cambridge,
called the Temple, once the
property of the
Knights
Templars,
richly endowed with costly
gifts. This was a place of sanctuary, as
were
the
other churches in the city.
With the destruction of the
houses came also the
decay
of the port which no ships
could enter. Its rival,
Southwold, attracted
the
vessels
of strangers. The markets and fairs
were deserted. Silence and
ruin reigned
over
the doomed town, and the
ruined church of All Saints is all
that remains of its
former
glories, save what the
storms sometimes toss along
the beach for the
study
and
edification of antiquaries.
As
we proceed down the coast we
find that the sea is
still gaining on the land.
The
old
church at Walton-on-the-Naze was swept
away, and is replaced by a new
one.
A
flourishing town existed at
Reculver, which dates back to
the Romans. It was a
prosperous
place, and had a noble church,
which in the sixteenth
century was a mile
from
the sea. Steadily have
the waves advanced, until a
century ago the church
fell
into
the sea, save two
towers which have been
preserved by means of elaborate
sea-
walls
as a landmark for
sailors.
The
fickle sea has deserted
some towns and destroyed
their prosperity; it
has
receded
all along the coast
from Folkestone to the
Sussex border, and left some
of
the
famous Cinque Ports, some of
which we shall visit again,
Lymne, Romney,
Hythe,
Richborough, Stonor, Sandwich, and
Sarre high and dry,
with little or no
access
to the sea. Winchelsea has
had a strange career. The old town
lies beneath
the
waves, but a new Winchelsea
arose, once a flourishing port,
but now deserted
and
forlorn with the sea a
mile away. Rye, too,
has been forsaken. It was once
an
island;
now the little Rother stream
conveys small vessels to the
sea, which looks
very
far away.
We
cannot follow all the
victories of the sea. We
might examine the inroads
made
by
the waves at Selsea. There
stood the first cathedral of
the district before
Chichester
was founded. The building is
now beneath the sea, and since
Saxon
times
half of the Selsea Bill has
vanished. The village of
Selsea rested securely
in
the
centre of the peninsula, but
only half a mile now
separates it from the sea.
Some
land
has been gained near this
projecting headland by an industrious
farmer. His
farm
surrounded a large cove with
a narrow mouth through which
the sea poured. If
he
could only dam up that
entrance, he thought he could
rescue the bed of the
cove
and
add to his acres. He bought
an old ship and sank it by the
entrance and
proceeded
to drain. But a tiresome
storm arose and drove
the ship right across
the
cove,
and the sea poured in again. By no
means discouraged, he dammed up
the
entrance
more effectually, got rid of
the water, increased his
farm by many acres,
and
the old ship makes an
admirable cow-shed.
Disused
Mooring-Post on bank of the
Rother, Rye
The
Isle of Wight in remote
geological periods was part of the
mainland. The Scilly
Isles
were once joined with
Cornwall, and were not
severed until the
fourteenth
century,
when by a mighty storm and
flood, 140 churches and villages
were
destroyed
and overwhelmed, and 190 square
miles of land carried away.
Much land
has
been lost in the Wirral
district of Cheshire. Great
forests have been
overwhelmed,
as the skulls and bones of
deer and horse and fresh-water
shell-fish
have
been frequently discovered at low
tide. Fifty years ago a distance of
half a
mile
separated Leasowes Castle from
the sea; now its
walls are washed by
the
waves.
The Pennystone, off the
Lancashire coast by Blackpool,
tells of a
submerged
village and manor, about
which cluster romantic
legends.
Such
is the sad record of the
sea's destruction, for which
the industrious
reclamation
of land, the compensations wrought by
the accumulation of shingle
and
sand
dunes and the silting of estuaries can
scarcely compensate us. How
does the
sea
work this? There are
certain rock-boring animals,
such as the Pholas,
which
help
to decay the rocks. Each mollusc
cuts a series of augur-holes
from two to four
inches
deep, and so assists in destroying
the bulwarks of England.
Atmospheric
action,
the disintegration of soft
rocks by frost and by the
attack of the sea
below,
all
tend in the same direction.
But the foolish action of
man in removing
shingle,
the
natural protection of our
coasts, is also very mischievous.
There is an instance
of
this in the Hall Sands and
Bee Sands, Devon. A company
a few years ago
obtained
authority to dredge both
from the foreshore and
sea-bed. The
Commissioners
of Woods and Forests and the
Board of Trade granted
this
permission,
the latter receiving a
royalty of £50 and the former
£150. This occurred
in
1896. Soon afterwards a heavy gale
arose and caused an immense
amount of
damage,
the result entirely of this
dredging. The company had to
pay heavily, and
the
royalties were returned to
them. This is only one
instance out of many
which
might
be quoted. We are an illogical
nation, and our regulations and
authorities are
weirdly
confused. It appears that
the foreshore is under the
control of the Board
of
Trade,
and then a narrow strip of
land is ruled over by the
Commissioners of
Woods
and Forests. Of course these bodies do
not agree; different
policies are
pursued
by each, and the coast
suffers. Large sums are sometimes spent
in coast-
defence
works. At Spurn no less than
£37,433 has been spent out
of Parliamentary
grants,
besides £14,227 out of the
Mercantile Marine Fund.
Corporations or county
authorities,
finding their coasts being
worn away, resolve to
protect it. They
obtain
a
grant in aid from Parliament,
spend vast sums, and often
find their work
entirely
thrown
away, or proving itself most
disastrous to their neighbours. If you
protect
one
part of the coast you
destroy another. Such is the
rule of the sea. If you
try to
beat
it back at one point it will revenge
itself on another. If only
you can cause
shingle
to accumulate before your threatened
town or homestead, you know
you
can
make the place safe and
secure from the waves.
But if you stop this flow
of
shingle
you may protect your
own homes, but you deprive
your neighbours of
this
safeguard
against the ravages of the
sea. It was so at Deal. The
good folks of Deal
placed
groynes in order to stop the
flow of shingle and protect
the town. They
did
their
duty well; they stopped
the shingle and made a good
bulwark against the
sea.
With
what result? In a few years'
time they caused the
destruction of Sandown,
which
had been deprived of its
natural protection. Mr. W. Whitaker,
F.R.S., who
has
walked along the whole
coast from Norfolk to
Cornwall, besides visiting
other
parts
of our English shore, and
whose contributions to the
Report of the Royal
Commission
on Coast Erosion are so
valuable, remembers when a boy
the Castle of
Sandown,
which dated from the
time of Henry VIII. It was then in a
sound
condition
and was inhabited. Now it is
destroyed, and the batteries farther
north
have
gone too. The same thing is
going on at Dover. The
Admiralty Pier causes
the
accumulation
of shingle on its west side,
and prevents it from following
its natural
course
in a north-easterly direction. Hence
the base of the cliffs on
the other side of
the
pier and harbour is left
bare and unprotected; this
aids erosion, and not
unfrequently
do we hear of the fall of the
chalk cliffs.
Isolated
schemes for the prevention
of coast erosion are of
little avail. They can
do
no
good, and only increase the
waste and destruction of land in
neighbouring
shores.
Stringent laws should be
passed to prevent the taking
away of shingle from
protecting
beaches, and to prohibit the
ploughing of land near the
edge of cliffs,
which
greatly assists atmospheric
destructive action from
above. The State
has
recently
threatened the abandonment of
the coastguard service. This
would be a
disastrous
policy. Though the primary
object of coastguards, the prevention
of
smuggling,
has almost passed away,
the old sailors who
act as guardians of
our
coast-line
render valuable services to the
country. They are most
useful in looking
after
the foreshore. They save
many lives from wrecked
vessels, and keep watch
and
ward to guard our shores,
and give timely notice of
the advance of a hostile
fleet,
or of that ever-present foe
which, though it affords
some protection for
our
island
home from armed invasion,
does not fail to exact a
heavy tithe from the
land
it
guards, and has destroyed so many once
flourishing towns and villages by
its
ceaseless
attack.
Table of Contents:
|
|||||