|
|||||
International
Relations-PSC 201
VU
LESSON
24
DISARMAMENT
AND ARMS CONTROL (CONTINUED)
Disarmament
after WWII
The
devastation unleashed by WWII
again led to calls for
disarmament. The UN charter
laid much
emphasis
on the need for disarmament.
The UN established a Military Staff
Committee to assist the
Security
Council to regulate armaments
and explore means for
disarmament.
Disarmament
efforts by the UN
The
UN established the Atomic
Energy Commission consisting
of all five Security Council
members and
Canada.
The
Commission was meant to explore
mechanisms for peaceful
transfer of nuclear technology, to
identify
safeguards
by way of inspections for
compliant states to prevent hazards of
violation and to eventually
work
towards
elimination of nuclear
weapons.
While
both superpowers agreed to
cooperate, their divergent stances (the
US arguing that control
take
precedence
over disarmament and the
USSR arguing the reverse) on the
Commission goals led to
its
ineffectiveness.
The
General Assembly of the UN also
established a Commission on Conventional
Armaments, which also
felt
victim to Cold War
divergences, ultimately the USSR
pulled out of both
Commissions due to
China's
representation
on them.
Atoms
for Peace Plan
In
1953, President Eisenhower of the US
proposed establishment of a pool of
fissionable materials donated
by
declared nuclear states to the
Atomic Energy Commission, which could be
provided to other
countries
strictly
for peaceful
purposes.
The
Soviets opposed this plan
arguing that an agreement on
prohibiting nuclear weapons
was first necessary
prior
to disseminating nuclear
technology.
Other
Disarmament Efforts
Many
disarmament and arms control
efforts were undertaken through bilateral
means between the two
superpowers,
the biggest proliferations of armaments
in the post-WWII period (NTBT,
NPT, SALT I and
II).
The
six nation summit held in
New Dehli in 1985 is
indicative of the growing concern
amongst developing
countries
about arms race, particularly
nuclear weapons (Ironically,
India too is now a declared
nuclear
state).
CTBT
The
NTP review conference was held in
Geneva in 1995 which
recommended infinite extension of
the
NTP.
Israel, Pakistan and India
were criticized for not
acceding to the NPT nor to the
subsequent CTBT,
which
even forbids tests required
for developing nuclear
weapons.
Even
France signed the CTBT after conducting
its last nuclear test in the
South Pacific. India and
Pakistan
remain
reluctant and argue that the
advanced nuclear states can
keep their weaponry safe
and updated by
tests
stimulated in lab settings.
Relevant
Vocabulary
Compliant:
agreeing
or accepting
International
Relations-PSC 201
VU
Reliant:
reliable
Divergent:
differing
or opposing
Reluctant:
hesitant
Stimulated:
replicated
or duplicated in different
conditions
Subsequent:
thereafter
Proliferation:
spread or dissemination
Forbid:
prohibit
or does not allow
Elimination: removal or
destruction
Regulation: to
provide guidelines or
parameters
Suggested
Readings
Students
are advised to read the
following chapters to develop a better understanding
of the various
principals
highlighted in this hand-out:
Chapter
7 in `"A Study of International
Relations" by Dr. Sultan
Khan
Internet
Resources
In
addition to reading from the
textbook, please visit the
following web-pages for this
lecture, which
provide
useful and interesting
information:
CTBT
Website
www.clw.org/coalition/ctbindex.htm
Table of Contents:
|
|||||