/96-21_files/96-2100001im.jpg" width="695"
height="1066" useMap="#Map">
Sport
Psychology(psy407)
VU
Lesson
21
COPING
STRATEGIES IN SPORT
Coping
has been defined by Lazarus
and Folkman (1984) as
"constantly changing cognitive
and behavioral
efforts
to manage specific external and/or
internal demands that are
appraised as taking or exceeding
the
resources
of the person".
Coping
involves a personal response on the
part of the athlete to address the
stress response. The
athlete
feels
anxious in a competitive situation and
tries to use personal coping
resources to reduce anxiety. The
use
of
various relaxations or arousal
management procedures to reduce anxiety
is commonly referred to as
stress
management. When an athlete
uses a stress management
technique or any other
cognitive or
behavioral
intervention, this is a form of
coping.
In
this lecture we will focus
our discussion on:
·
A
conceptual framework for coping
strategies and styles
·
Measurement
of coping skills.
·
The
dynamic nature of coping
skill
·
Factors
that enhance the generalizability of
coping
·
Coping
strategies used by elite
athletes.
Conceptual
Framework for Coping Strategies and
Styles
Coping
strategies are of two types:
problem-focused and emotion-focused. Problem focused
coping
strategies
center on alleviating the environmental
stimulus that is causing the
stress response. For
example,
in
cricket, if a right handed
batsman is very anxious when
batting against a left-arm
bowler, an appropriate
problem-focused
coping strategy might be to get
more experience against a
left-arm bowler during
practice.
Other
common names for problem
focused coping includes the terms
"task-focused coping"
and
sometimes
"action focused
coping."
Emotion
focused coping strategies seek to
regulate emotions in order to reduce or
manage cognitive
distress.
In the same cricket example, the batsman
would focus his coping on
controlling his emotions
through
anxiety reduction techniques. Instead of attacking the
source of the problem, through
problem-
focused
coping, the athlete seeks to reduce or
eliminate the symptoms associated with
stress.
Several
authors have proposed a third coping
strategy and called it "avoidance
coping". Anshel and
others
however,
have pointed out that rather
than being a coping strategy, avoidance
coping is really a coping style.
Two
different coping styles are
identified: approach coping and
avoidance coping.
Some
athletes prefer an approach style of
coping in which their coping preference
is to address the stressful
situation
directly. Conversely, some
athletes prefer an avoidance style of
coping, in which their preferred
coping
style is to solve the problem by
avoiding the problem. Avoidance coping is
also referred to as
repression,
disengagement, or rejection.
Based
upon these four different
coping strategies include:
1.
Approach/problem-focused coping
2.
Approach/emotion-focused coping
3.
Avoidance/problem-focused coping
4.
Avoidance/emotion-focused coping
Athletes
cope with stress by either
approaching or avoiding the situation.
Within this framework, they will
either
adopt an active problem-solving
strategy or an emotion-focused
strategy.
©
Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
69
/96-21_files/96-2100002im.jpg" width="695"
height="1066" useMap="#Map">
Sport
Psychology(psy407)
VU
Measurement
of Coping Skill
Several
different pencil-and-paper inventories have
been developed to measure coping
resources. Among
them
are:
-
Ways
of Coping Checklist (WOCC) by Crocker,
Folkman & Lazarus
(1992)
-
COPE
and MCOPE instruments by
Craver, Scheier and
Weintraub(1989)
-
Coping
inventory for stressful
situations (CISS) by Endler &
Parker
-
The
Coping Style in Sport Survey
(CSSS) by Anshel et al.
(1990)
The
Coping Style in Sport Survey
(CSSS) was developed to reflect the coping
styles and strategies.
The
CSSS
is composed of 134 items
associated with seven common
sports-related stressors. The
athletes' task is
to
indicate how she would
usually respond relative to the following
acute stressors:
1.
After
making a physical or mental
error
2.
After
being criticized by the coach
3.
After
observing my opponent cheat
4.
After
experiencing intense pain or
injury
5.
After
receiving a "bad" call by an
official
6.
After
successful performance by an
opponent
7.
After
poor environmental conditions
such as bad weather, poor
ground/court conditions or
negative
crowd reactions
The
Dynamic Nature of Coping
Styles and Strategies
Sport
psychologists have been
interested in knowing if athletes' coping
strategies are dispositional in
nature
or
if they are consistent with a
dynamic process. The dispositional
hypothesis posits that
athletes have a
certain
learned or innate way of coping with
stress-related situations. Conversely,
the dynamic hypothesis
posits
that athletes' coping responses
are dynamic and fluid,
changing from situation to situation.
Research
shows
that athletes utilize a
dynamic as opposed to dispositional
approach to coping with
stress.
Applied
research (Gould, Eklund &
Jackson, 1993; Gould, Finch
and Jackson, 1993; Park,
2000) supported
the
hypothesis that coping strategies
and styles are dynamic
and fluid.
Factors
That Enhance the Genralizability of
Coping
The
skills athletes acquire to
deal with anxiety, low
self-confidence, and other
stressful sport-related
situations
may generalize to other more
global life situations. This
means that if an athlete can
learn to cope
with
failure (or success) in an athletic
situation, the coping skill may be
transferred to another sport
situation
or
even a stressful nonsport situation
such as illness, financial setback,
loss of job or loss of
friend.
In
this regards, Smith (1999) identifies
five different factors that
can facilitate the generalizability of coping
skills
to other situations. These
factors are as
follow:
1.
Recognition of stimulus
generality
Many
stressful life situations
are very similar to athletic situations.
Recognizing the similarity and
recalling
the
specific coping strategy that
was effective in the athletic situations
will facilitate transfer of coping
skill
to
another situation.
©
Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
70
/96-21_files/96-2100003im.jpg" width="695"
height="1066" useMap="#Map">
Sport
Psychology(psy407)
VU
2.
Broad application of coping
skill
Some
coping skills are very specific to a
specific athletic situation, but others
are very broad. Progressive
relaxation,
for example, is a broad coping skill
that should generalize to numerous sport
and nonsport
situations.
3.
Personal significance of coping
application
A
coping skill that was effective in
reducing stress related to an
issue of great personal
significance will be
remembered.
Coping skills that have
proven to be personally important
will generalize to other
situations.
4.
Internal locus of control of
coping skill
When
an athlete claims "ownership" of a coping
skill it is more easily
transferred to other
situations.
5.
Learned resourcefulness
Learning
a specific coping skill to address a
specific life stress is effective,
The resourceful individual
looks
for
broader application of all coping skills
and learning experiences.
Coping
Strategies Used By Elite
Athletes
Gould
and colleagues (Gould,
Eklund & Jackson, 1993;
Gould, Finch & Jackson,
1993) studied coping
strategies
reported by Olympic wrestlers and
National Champion figure skaters.
Thirty-nine different
themes
were found and then
were reduced down to four
broad dimensions:
a.
Thought
control strategies example, self-talk,
positive thinking, thought
control
b.
Attentional
focus strategies example concentration
control, tunnel
vision
c.
Emotional
control strategies example,
arousal control, relaxation,
visualization
d.
Behavioral
strategies. Example, set routine
rest, control of the
environment.
All
athletes use all four coping
strategies. Female sportspersons
utilize social support as a strategy
more
often
than males. Elite athletes
tend to use an approach style of coping,
with the majority of the
strategies
being
problem or action focused. All
these strategies may be
categorized under the heading of
psychological
training,
physical training and
strategizing, and somatic
relaxation.
References
Cox,
H. Richard. (2002). Sport Psychology:
Concepts and Applications.
(Fifth Edition). New York:
McGraw-
Hill
Companies
Lavallec.
D., Kremer, J., Moran,
A., & Williams. M. (2004)
Sports Psychology: Contemporary Themes.
New
York:
Palgrave Macmillan
Publishers
©
Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
71