/96-13_files/96-1300001im.jpg" width="718"
height="1022" useMap="#Map">
VU
Sport
Psychology (PSY407)
LESSON
13
ATTENTION
AND CONCENTRATION IN SPORT
This
lecture is a continuation of lecture
twelve, the remaining five concepts of
attention and
concentration
which will be discussed in this
lecture are:
·
Attentional
narrowing
·
Being
in the zone
·
Measuring
attentional focus
·
Attention
control training
·
Associative
versus dissociative attentional
styles.
Attention
Narrowing
An
athlete's ability to attend to appropriate
stimuli during competition
has been termed
attentional
focus.
The concept of attentional
focus includes the ability of an
athlete to both narrow and
broaden
her
attention when necessary. For
example, in cricket, a fielder attempting
to run out a batsman must
be
able
to broaden his attentional focus in
order to see other teammate
who will be collecting his
throw
and
hitting the stumps. The same
player must be able to narrow
his attentional focus while
batting in
order
to block out distractions
from the crowd.
The
notation of attentional narrowing is
best understood in terms of cue
utilization. Environmental
cues
provide the athlete with
needed information for a skilled
performance. In any sport task,
many
cues
are available to the athlete.
Some are relevant and
necessary for quality
performance; others
are
irrelevant
and can damage performance.
Under conditions of low
arousal, the athlete picks up
both
relevant
and irrelevant cues. The
presence of irrelevant cues should
result in a decrement in
performance.
As arousal increases, the athlete's
attention begins to narrow. At
some optimal point,
attentional
narrowing gates out all of
the irrelevant cues and allows the
relevant cues to remain. At this
point
performance should be at its best. If
arousal increases still
further, attention continues to
narrow
and
relevant cues are gated out,
causing deterioration in
performance.
High
levels of arousal may also
lead to the phenomenon of distractibility. In
addition to gating out
potentially
relevant cues, high arousal
may also decrease an
athlete's ability to selectively attend
to one
stimulus
at a time. Distractibility has the effect of
decreasing the athlete's ability to
discriminate relevant
and
irrelevant cues, and to
focus upon relevant cues.
The athlete who is suffering
from distractibility
tends
to experience sudden and significant
decrements in performance. Performing in
an athletic event
requires
an athlete to narrowly focus
upon the task at hand in order to
realize success. Too
much
arousal
undermines the athlete's ability to
narrowly focus attention in a
quality manner, while too
little
arousal
may introduce unwanted competition
between irrelevant and relevant
cues.
Most
recently, Janelle, Singer, and
Williams (1999) reported the results of
an experiment in which
increased
arousal decreased performance on
both a central car driving
task and a peripheral reaction
time
task. Similarly, research conducted by
Williams and Elliot (1999)
showed that under conditions
of
increased
and decreased attentional narrowing,
athletes alter the way in
which they scan peripheral
information.
Under conditions of low
arousal, athletes used peripheral
vision (broad focus).
Under
conditions
of high arousal they use peripheral
scanning (narrow focus).
Attentional
flexibility refers
to the ability of athletes to quickly
and effectively shift their
attention from
one
location to another. Another
characteristic of attentional flexibility
is the ability of individuals to
shift
from a very narrow attentional
focus to a very broad focus.
42
/96-13_files/96-1300002im.jpg" width="718"
height="1022" useMap="#Map">
VU
Sport
Psychology (PSY407)
Cognitive
interference is
defined as "thoughts of escape"
and "task-irrelevant thoughts".
Any random thought or
event
that would tend to break an
athlete's concentration could be considered
cognitive interference.
When
Athletes Are In the
Zone
When
the body is brought to peak
condition and the mind is completely
focused, even unaware of what
it's
doing,
an individual can achieve the
extraordinary (Tolson, 2000). The
concept of a zone of optimal
functioning
was
first introduced by Russian
psychologist Yuri Hanin
(1980) when he presented his
theory of optimal
functioning
relative to state anxiety. Another
individual who is often mentioned in
discussion of the "zone" is
Mihaly
Csikszentmihalyi, (1975) who
generated the concept of FLOW.
Being a "physical genius" is not
just
being
in the "zone", it is perfecting your game
mentally and physically, so that you
are in the "zone" when
you
need
to be.
In
learning a new sport skill, an athlete
must focus upon controlled
processing of
information. This means
that
the athlete must attend to the details of
executing the skill to be learned.
For example, a beginning
basketball
player's attention is focused on learning
how to dribble a basketball, to the
exclusion of other
important
cues. Controlled processing is relatively
slow and effortless,
consuming most of the
available
information
processing capacity of the
individual.
Once
a sport skill is mastered, it comes under
automatic
processing. The
execution of the skill is still
being
monitored
by the brain, but because it is well
learned it requires little
conscious attention. Now, the
basketball
player
will be focusing most of the
available information processing
space on other basketball
related cues.
The
perfect execution of a sport skill is best
thought of as an elegant interaction
between mind and
body.
Measuring
Attentional Focus
Landers
(1988) identified three primary
ways in which attention may
be measured by sport psychologists.
In
method
one a behavioral assessment of attention
is made using the reaction time probe
technique. In this
procedure,
attention demands of a primary are
estimated based on a subject's
performance on a secondary
reaction
time task. The second method
used by sport psychologists for
assessing attention is the use
of
psychological
indicators. Psychological arousal
and attentional focus are
closely related. As the level of
arousal
increases,
an individual's attentional focus
tends narrows. The third
method is through the use of the
self-report.
The
self report method is more of an
indicator of attentional focus as a
personality trait or disposition
Attention
Control Training
Sport
psychologists have written
extensively about attention
control training (Nideffer,
1992; Nideffer &
Sagal,
1998;
Schmid & Peper, 1998; Zinsser,
Bunker, & Williams, 2001).
The primary component of attention
control
training
(ACT)
is the process of narrowing or widening
attention through arousal
management strategies.
Focusing
Attention
As
an athlete prepares for
competition, she will focus
her attention internally, as
she considers thoughts
and
feelings
associated with analyzing
and rehearsing; and externally, as
she assesses the situation, teammates,
and
opponents.
Attention control required for
actual competition is generally
externally focused and ranges
from
narrow
to broad, depending on the situation.
Thought
Stopping and
Centering
In
addition to arousal management,
attention training must
teach the athlete how to eliminate
negative
thoughts.
Self-talk is an attentional strategy
designed to focus an athlete on
positive thoughts and
43
/96-13_files/96-1300003im.jpg" width="718"
height="1022" useMap="#Map">
VU
Sport
Psychology (PSY407)
behaviors.
It is critically important that the
athlete learns to use
attention to stop negative thoughts
and
to
focus on positive thoughts. Attention
control is a technique designed to keep
the athlete from
slipping
into
a cycle of anxiety and self-doubt.
It
is important for an athlete to
approach every sport situation with a
positive attitude and belief
that she
can
win. When negative thoughts
come into consciousness, they
must be removed or replaced
by
positive
thoughts. The process of stopping a
negative thought and
replacing it with a positive
one is
referred
to as thought
stopping (Zinsser
et al, 2001). It is a basic
principle of psychology that an
athlete
cannot
give quality attention to
more than one attention-demanding
task at a time. Once the
negative
thought
has been displaced, the
athlete centers her attention
internally. The process of
centering
involves
directing thoughts internally. Many
athletes accomplish this by taking a
deep breath and exhaling
slowly.
The
following basic steps are
used in the thought-stopping and
creating procedure:
Displace
any negative thought that
comes into your mind
with a positive
thought.
Center
your attention internally
while making minor adjustments in
arousal.
Narrowly
focus your attention externally on a
task-relevant cue associated
with proper form.
1.
Execute
the sport skill as soon as you
have achieved a feeling of attentional
control.
Learning
the thought-stopping and centering
procedure takes practice.
The critical point to understand
is
that
negative thoughts can be displaced,
and that though the process
of centering, the thoughts that
capture
attention can be controlled.
The conscious process of
thought stopping and centering
will divert
the
athlete's attention from threatening
thoughts and anxiety-producing stimuli. Selective
attention will
effectively
gate out the unwanted thoughts if the
correct thoughts are pertinent
and meaningful to the
athlete.
Associative
Versus Dissociative Attentional
Style
Morgan
(1978) hypothesized that marathon
runners adopt one of two
attentional styles to assist them
in
training
and competition. The
associators internalize the directions dimension of
attention and focus
on
the
body's sensory feedback signals.
The dissociators externalize the
direction dimension of attention
and
gate
out or block sensory
information from the
body.
Measurement
of Attentional Style
Masters
and Ogle (1998a) noted that
researchers have utilized
six different methods of
measurements.
Methods
of measurement include:
1.
Pencil-and-paper
inventories
2.
Structured
interviews
3.
Tape
recording during running
4.
Objective
data
5.
Subjective
data
6.
Experimenter
rating
Pencil-and-paper
inventories include the Running Style Questionnaire
(RSQ; Silva & Appelbaum,
1989);
Brewer,
Van Raalte & Linder,
19996), and the Thoughts
During Running Scale (TDRS;
Goode & Roth,
1993).
44
/96-13_files/96-1300004im.jpg" width="718"
height="1022" useMap="#Map">
VU
Sport
Psychology (PSY407)
References
Cox,
H. Richard. (2002). Sport Psychology:
Concepts and Applications.
(Fifth Edition). New York:
McGraw-
Hill
Companies
Lavallec.
D., Kremer, J., Moran,
A., & Williams. M. (2004)
Sports Psychology: Contemporary Themes.
New
York:
Palgrave Macmillan
Publishers
45