/92-43_files/92-4300001im.jpg" width="718"
height="1067" useMap="#Map">
Neurological
Basis of Behavior (PSY -
610)
VU
Lesson43
Higher
Order Brain
functions
Objectives:
The
students would be familiarized
with the role of higher
order brain functioning in disorders
of
speech,
motor and sensory apraxias, memory
and amnesias.
Brain
correlates
·
a)
Language
Speech Production Comprehensions,
Aphasias
·
b)
Visuospatial,
The man who mistook
his wife for a
hat?
·
c)
Apraxias.
(Neuropsychological tools)
·
d)
Brain
correlates of Learning and Memory,
Amnesia, Verbal, Non verbal
memory,
·
e)
(Neuropsychological
tools)
Aphasia
and Dyslexia:
Aphasias
and Dyslexia are related
because the spoken words are transferred to
written language.
Reading
and writing is closely tied to
listening and speaking auditory
modality). Wernicke's aphasia
is
accompanied
by dyslexia.
Interestingly,
there are more dyslexics with
Wernicke's aphasia in English and
other western language,
but
not so in Chinese where each
word is represented individually or where
the sign language (spatial
not
auditory modality) is
used.
Chinese
aphasics retain ability to
write accurately. The
Japanese language comprises of two
forms the
Kanji
and the Kana. The Kanji symbols
are the pictographs adopted from the
Chinese language. These
are
the visual representation of concepts,
thus a house would be shape
of a Pagoda. On the other hand
the
Kana symbols are acousitic or Phonetic
representations. Thus Kana (sound, auditory mode),
and
kanji
(visual mode) Sasanuma (1975)
reported that left temporal
lobe lesions affected the writing of
the
Kana
symbols but not the Kanji where
visual cortex is
involved).
The
Japanese language: 3 phonetics and 1
pictograph
Mode:
Kana
Kanji
Brain
areas
left
temporal lobe
Visual
cortex
Generally
most languages use sound
and acoustic signals and cues to
write (look at how recite
our
nursery
rhymes and how we remember the correct
spelling of words). The
question is if we are so
dependent
on the sound for language what
about the deaf? Interestingly the deaf
are not dyslexics
with
receptive
aphasia (as they read
without phonetics (Braille, the language
script of the blind is a
touch
language)
Aphasias
related to speech
A
wide range of disorders even within the
major aphasias, the characteristics
differ with areas of
damage.
We will disucss some of this
aphasia in brief.
a)
Conduction Aphasia: is produced
when damage to inferior
parietal zone disconnects the
axonal
fibres
connecting the Brocas and the Wernicke's
areas. Conduction aphasics have
meaningful,
paraphrasic
speech, somewhat fair comprehension,
but poor repetition (they
can repeat single and
meaningful
words, but not non-meaningful
words)
169
/92-43_files/92-4300002im.jpg" width="718"
height="1067" useMap="#Map">
Neurological
Basis of Behavior (PSY -
610)
VU
b)
Anomic Aphasia: This is
aphasia specific to names.
They have difficulty in finding the
right word,
so
they use circumlocution
going the round about
way
I
had a patient who had anomia after a
stroke
When
asked to identify a stapler in a picture:
What is it?
He
replied, it is used in the
office.
Yes,
but what is it?
It
is used to pin papers
together
Yes,
but what is it?
He
showed how it worked
Yes
but what is its
name
He
could not give the name even
after several attempts.
This
illustrates that he knew
what it was, what it was
used for, but could
not name it.
There
are cortical aphasias and
Trans cortical aphasia, and
sub cortical aphasias, but
we would not be
discussing
the whole classification, this
should be enough to give you
an idea.
Dyslexia:
(Reading, Writing,
Mathematics)
Reading
and writing disorders are related to the
kind of aphasia that patients have.
The patient with
Wernicke's
aphasia would have difficulty
reading and writing as they do
comprehending speech.
Broca's
aphasics have difficulty in reading
out aloud; their writing and
speech both are
agrammatical
a)
Alexia with
Agraphia:
This
is a difficulty in which the person
has difficulty in reading
and writing. This is caused
by damage
to
the left angular gyrus in the
parietal lobe (angular gyrus
is at the borderline of visual, auditory
and
somatosensory
cortices therefore it may
affect skills involving all
three modalities
b)
Pure Alexia:
This
is actually word blindness, where alexia
occurs without agraphia:
patient can write but cannot
read
what
he writes. Although they cannot
read, they can recognize the words if
they are spelled out to
them.
Pure
Alexia is a perceptual disorder, similar
to pure word deafness only it is
visual not auditory.
c)
Agnosias are
disorders related to sensory modalities
either auditory or
visual
Disorders
of auditory perception
Agnosias:
An
auditory agnosia is the impaired
capacity to recognize auditory stimuli,
perhaps due to a disturbance
of
perceptual processes more than
sensations. There appears no
problem with the input of
information
but
of giving it meaning and of recognizing
it.
We
will discuss only two of
these here
a)
Amusia
b)
Agnosia
for Sounds
1.
Amusia: subdivisions
of this disorder are tone
deafness: inability to discriminate
various tones of
musical
scales, and Music deafness:
impaired recall or recognition of a
melody, tune) as well as
rhythm,
measure,
or tempo (beat), and Receptive amusia;
difficulty in discriminating basic
notes of music or
series
of notes of pitch, rhythm
etc
2.
Agnosia for sounds: inability
to identify what the different
nonverbal sounds mean
(classification
difficulty?
For example if there are
different kinds of bells
ringing --church, school, telephone,
the
170
/92-43_files/92-4300003im.jpg" width="718"
height="1067" useMap="#Map">
Neurological
Basis of Behavior (PSY -
610)
VU
patient
cannot tell the difference. These
sounds may sound all
alike, or may be confused for
each other.
So
basically it's discrimination and
categorization deficit.
For
these disorders it appears that the
bilateral temporal regions are
involved
Visual
deficits: These
are deficits related to
integration or processing of visual
information. Agnosia is
a
failure of recognition, not due to
sensory (the input is all
right) or intellectual problems (the
patient
does
not have any intellectual
impairment).
Visual
Agnosia: is Agnosia
for visual stimulus. It is
not a seeing deficit, as the
patient can see
but
cannot
put the pieces of visual
input together in a coherent
form.
Very
interesting deficit: Prosopagnosia
Prosopagnosia
is
Visual Agnosia: Faces is the
first key you have to other
people- friend or foe?
There
is
a dictionary of features of faces where
every face is immediately
matched. Prosopagnosics have
difficulty
recognizing a face know it is a
face but who?
The
patients report seeing parts
such as nose, eyes, lips
but cannot put it together. In
order to recognize a
face
you have to match and put
together the entire feature in a coherent
face. In extreme form of
this
deficit
patients cannot even recognize themselves in the
mirror. This is due to damage to
the
Inferotemporal
region. There are some patients
who have difficulty recognizing
only the familiar
faces,
while
others have difficulty in recognizing
unfamiliar faces. They can
sometimes use a cue such as
a
mole
or a scar to recognize a face. It is a
visual-limbic disconnection (especially
for familiar faces)
of
the
Right hemisphere
region
Apraxia
is
movement or motor difficulties when
required to perform at a verbal command.
Though
these
tasks can be performed spontaneously
(can be copied) without problems.
Apraxias are bilateral
but
usually
produced by the left hemisphere lesion.
This deficit was first
described by Hughlings-Jackson
Apraxia:
Greek word praxis: no action. The
missing or inappropriate action is not
due to paralysis or
difficulties
of motor movement, or of understanding of
instructions, or motivation, but
difficulty in
carrying
out the action
required.
Construction
Apraxia: is tested by
asking the patient to copy or
draw or build blocks in a
given design.
There
is both left hemisphere and
right hemisphere damage. LH is
oversimplification, very little
details,
whereas
RH damage leads to loss of
overall gestalt
We
have seen some of the deficits
which are caused by damage
to the cortical areas. This
requires
complex
neuropsychological examination and
rehabilitation strategies can be
developed keeping
each
patients
individual deficits in
mind
References:
1.
Carlson N.R. (2005) Foundations of
Physiological Psychology Allyn and Bacon,
Boston
2.
Pinel, John P.J. (2003)
Biopsychology (5th edition) Allyn and Bacon
Singapore
3.
Bloom F, Nelson and Lazerson (2001),
Behavioral Neuroscience: Brain, Mind
and Behaviors (3rd
edition)
Worth Publishers New
York
4.
Bridgeman, B (1988) The
Biology of Behaviour and Mind. John
Wiley and Sons New
York
5.
Brown,T.S. and Wallace.(1980) P.M
Physiological Psychology. Academic
Press New York.
6.
Bradshaw J.L. and Mattingley, J.B.
(1995) Clinical Neuropsychology:
Behavioral and Brain
Sciences.
ACADEMIC PRESS
171