/90-40_files/90-4000001im.jpg" width="692" height="804"
useMap="#Map">
History
and Systems of Psychology
PSY502
VU
Lesson
40
ANTI-PSYCHIATRY
MOVEMENT
Anti-psychiatry
refers to approaches which fundamentally
challenge the theory or practice of
mainstream
psychiatry
in general and biological
psychiatry in particular. Anti-psychiatric
criticisms of mainstream
psychiatry
include that it uses medical
concepts and tools
inappropriately, that it treats
patients against
their
will
or inappropriately dominates other
approaches to mental health, that
its medical and ethical
integrity are
compromised
by its financial and
professional links with
pharmaceutical companies, and
that it uses a
system
of categorical diagnosis that is
stigmatizing and is perceived by
too many of its patients
as
demeaning
and controlling.
A
significant minority of mental health
professionals and acsademics
profess anti-psychiatry views, and
even
some
psychiatrists hold such
views in regard to mainstream
(biological) psychiatry. Psychiatrists
generally
view
anti-psychiatry as a fringe movement with
little or no scientific validity,
although it is difficult to
quantify
the proportion of the general public or
professionals involved, or the range of
views held.
D.L.
Rosenhan
Anti-psychiatry
movement can be understood by looking at an experiment
undertaken by an American
psychologist
D.L. Rosenhan. The experiment
was that, three women and
five men who were
perfectly
normal
and most of them were well
educated, entered in 12 mental
institutions of different places in
U.S.A.
They
posed as mental patients
saying that they hear
voices, but apart from this,
offered completely correct
information
about themselves. These
"patients" remained in hospitals
for 19 days on the average.
Based
upon
the experiences of these posing
patients, Rosenhan concluded
that:
·
It
is impossible to distinguish between normal people
and patients according to the
rules and
procedures
of mental hospitals.
·
Mental
hospitals leave extremely
negative effects on
inmates.
·
Mental
hospitals treat patients without
pity and with
cruelty.
·
That
the overall environment of mental
hospitals needs great
improvement.
Further,
research showed in this context
that up to 80% patients released
from mental hospitals went
back
and
are re-admitted.
So
a realization arose among psychologists
that the methods of treatment being used
by psychiatrists were
inadequate
and inappropriate for the treatment of
mental disorders. Some
psychologists and
psychiatrists
rejected
these methods, and that is
why their approach is called
Anti-Psychiatry.
R.D.
Laing
R.D.
Laing was a British
psychiatrist, who was born
in 1927 and died in 1989.
Laing wrote extensively
on
mental
illness and particularly the experience
of psychosis. He is being noted for
his views, influenced by
existential
philosophy, on the causes and treatment
of mental illness, which went
against the psychiatric
orthodoxy
of the time by taking the expressions or
communications of the individual patient
or client as
representing
valid descriptions of live
experience or reality rather than
focusing on symptoms of
some
separate
or underlying disorder. He is often
associated with the anti-psychiatry
movement, although
like
many
of his contemporaries also
critics of psychiatry, he himself
rejected this label. He made a
significant
contribution
to the ethics of psychology.
His
book "The Divided Self"
appeared in 1959 and is
considered to represent the basic
view of anti-
psychiatry
movement. Laing used the existential
philosophy to understand and explain the
concept of
89
/90-40_files/90-4000002im.jpg" width="692" height="237"
useMap="#Map">
History
and Systems of Psychology
PSY502
VU
mental
illness, thereby trying to look at
schizophrenia from the patient's point of
view. He was against
labeling
mental diseases, because he
thought that from the patient's
view, he is not suffering from a
disease.
In
his opinion labeling was
used to control people. In other
words, in his own view no
patient was sick.
All
that
he was suffering from was
labeled on him by the people who
are treating him. Therefore,
Laing
suggested
that the patient's point of view should
be kept in mind while treating
mental diseases.
In
his view the cause of mental
disease was division in the
self and the therapy suggested by
Laing is known
as
"Metanoia."
Metanoia means a change in the
mind. This could be achieved in various
ways such as arts,
discussions,
seminars, etc. He established a
place called Kingsley Hall
where activities such as
seminars,
discussions,
dance, yoga, painting, stitching
were carried out to create
and achieve metanoia.
Aaron
Esterson
Another
prominent psychologist in anti-psychiatry movement
was Aaron Esterson who
was born in 1923
and
died in 1982.
Esterson
focused on family therapy and
showed that the family picks
up a person and then labels
that
person
"mad." This is called
scapegoating. In
his book he relates the case
of a young girl who was
thought
by
her parents to be mentally sick
but in reality she was healthy.
Therefore Esterson showed
that madness
or
schizophrenia is an expression of
scapegoating of the family. His method of
treatment was to expose the
mechanisms
of scapegoating to the patient and
make the patient realize
that he or she was not
sick but was
just
being called sick. In that
way the patient would be
able to deal with any
future labeling upon
him.
90