/
40-23_files/40-2300001im.jpg" width="695"
height="1066" useMap="#Map">
Business
Ethics MGT610
VU
LESSON
23
OLIGOPOLISTIC
COMPETITION
Oligopolistic
Competition
Oligopolies
can set high prices through
explicit agreements to restrain
competition. The more
highly
concentrated the oligopoly,
the easier it is to collude against
the interests of
society,
economic
freedom, and justice. The
following list identifies practices
that are clearly
unethical:
1.
Price
Fixing - when
companies agree to set prices
artificially high.
2.
Manipulation
of Supply - when a
company agrees to limit
production.
3.
Exclusive
Dealing Arrangements - when a
company sells to a retailer
only on
condition
that the retailer will not
purchase products from other companies
and/or will
not
sell outside a certain
geographical area.
4.
Tying
Arrangements - when a
company sells a buyer
certain goods only on
condition
that
the buyer also purchases
other goods from the
firm.
5.
Retail
Price Maintenance Agreements - when a
company sells to a retailer
only on
condition
that they agree to charge
the same set retail
prices.
6.
Price
Discrimination - when a
company charges different prices to
different buyers for
the
same goods or services.
Several
industrial and organizational factors
lead companies to engage in these
practices:
1.
Crowded
and Mature Market - When
large numbers of new
entrants or declining
demand
create overcapacity in a market,
the resulting decline in
revenues and profits
creates
pressures on middle-level managers. They
may respond by allowing,
encouraging,
and even ordering their
sales teams to engage in
price fixing.
2.
Job-Order
Nature of Business - If orders
are priced individually so
that pricing
decisions
are made frequently and at
low levels of the
organization, collusion
among
low-level
salespeople is more
likely.
3.
Undifferentiated
Products - When
the product offered by each
company in an industry
is
so similar to those of other companies
that they must compete on
price alone by
continually
reducing prices, salespeople come to feel
that the only way to
keep prices
from
collapsing is by getting together and
fixing prices.
4.
Culture
of the Business - When an
organization's salespeople feel
that price fixing is
a
common
practice and is desired, condoned,
accepted, rationalized, and even
encouraged
by
the organization, price
fixing is more
likely.
5.
Personnel
Practices - When
managers are evaluated and
rewarded solely or
primarily
on
the basis of profits and
volume so that bonuses, commissions,
advancement, and
other
rewards are dependent on these
objectives, they will come to believe
that the
company
wants them to achieve these
objectives regardless of the
means.
6.
Pricing
Decisions - When
organizations are decentralized so
that pricing decisions
are
pushed
down into the hands of a
lower part of the
organization, price fixing is
more
likely
to happen. Price decisions should be made at
higher organizational
levels.
7.
Trade
Associations - Allowing
salespeople to meet with competitors in
trade
association
meetings will encourage them to talk
about pricing and to begin to
engage in
price-setting
arrangements with their counterparts in
competing firms.
8.
Corporate
Legal Staff - When
legal departments fail to provide
guidance to sales
staff
until
after a problem has
occurred, price-fixing problems
are more likely.
51
/
40-23_files/40-2300002im.jpg" width="695"
height="1066" useMap="#Map">
Business
Ethics MGT610
VU
It
is difficult to legislate against many
common oligopolistic price-setting
practices, however,
because
they are accomplished by
tacit agreement. Firms may,
without ever discussing
it
explicitly,
realize that competition is
not in their collective best
interests. Therefore, they
may
recognize
one firm as the "price
leader," raising their prices in
reaction when the leader
decides
to
do so. No matter how prices
are set, however, clearly
social utility declines when
prices are
artificially
raised.
Firms
also occasionally resort to bribery,
which also results in a decline in
market competition.
Bribes
serve as a barrier to others entering
the market; the briber
becomes, in effect, a
monopoly
seller. To determine whether a
payment is ethical, there
are three relevant points
to
consider:
52